Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Bill Fails on Cloture Vote for Investment Tax Credit Extension

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 04:14 PM
Original message
Senate Bill Fails on Cloture Vote for Investment Tax Credit Extension
http://www.solarbuzz.com/News/NewsNAGO361.htm

The latest attempt to extend the current Investment Tax Credits failed today in the Senate. A cloture vote on the Energy Independence and Tax Relief Act of 2008 only secured a 52 for – 44 against result. A cloture motion requires the support of 60 Senators.

The bill would have provided a 8-year extensions of both the commercial and residential solar tax credits, relief from the alternative minimum tax for companies and individual filers that want to take the solar tax credit, a doubling of the residential monetary cap to $4,000 and elimination of the public utility prohibition on taking the credit directly. The bill included offsets that close an income tax loophole for hedge-fund managers and delays a favorable accounting provision for multinational corporations.

SEIA president Rhone Resch said, “I am deeply disappointed that the Senate has once again failed to reach a bipartisan consensus that would allow this important legislation to move forward. Not extending the solar tax credits is an enormous tax increase that will cost America tens of thousands of jobs. If the Senate is unable to act - and the solar tax credits are allowed to expire – it will result in the loss of billions of dollars in new investments in solar."

<not much more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hopefully a new administration and congress will be worth this obstructionism.
Proponents of nuclear look bad enough when subsidies are discussed; when the negative impact of the seesawing of the subsidies is factored in, the actual dollar discrepancy is magnified many, many times. Regulatory uncertainly is one of the most effective means of killing off a budding industry or technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC