Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Costs Surge for Building Power Plants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 05:48 PM
Original message
Costs Surge for Building Power Plants
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 05:54 PM by jpak
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/business/worldbusiness/10energy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

General Electric called in reporters yesterday for a briefing on a nuclear plant it is trying to sell in partnership with Hitachi, a plant it said can be built faster than before, operated reliably and have a vanishingly small chance of an accident.

But what will it cost? After some hemming and hawing, company executives gave figures by the standard industry metric, dollars per kilowatt of capacity, but in a huge range: $2,000 to $3,000.

“There’s massive inflation in copper and nickel and stainless steel and concrete,” said John Krenecki, president and chief executive of GE Energy. The uncertainty is not just in nuclear plants, he said; coal plant prices are now similarly unstable.

As talk of building new power plants rises sharply, so does the cost. A new fleet of coal-fired power plants and a revival of nuclear construction after three decades are both looking tougher lately.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. This isn't limited to nuclear or fossil plants either
From your link:

"Renewable energy is not immune. “Costs have increased for wind as they have for other technologies,” said Christine Real de Azua, a spokeswoman for the American Wind Energy Association. “While wind farm operations are not hit by fuel price volatility, steep increases in the cost of raw materials like copper and steel and other factors have driven up the price of wind turbines,” she said in an e-mail statement."

Short answer: ALL forms of energy are becoming more expensive, and we only have a short period of time to build up our energy infrastructure before such large undertakings become impossible due to economic decline from peak fossil fuels and global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. However, the cost of PV modules is declining and will continue to decline
Silicon is cheap and abundant, and global capacity to produce PV-grade poly-Si is growing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. With the costs of raw materials and energy increasing, I doubt that trend will continue
That is the major implication of peak fossil fuel: EVERYTHING gets more expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. $2-3/W is huge?


Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. PV prices went up because of a sudden jump in demand
can't say the same about nuclear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah, from $4.30
huge-and-a-half is the cheapest they've ever been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phildo Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. With PV, the modules are not the total cost . . .
To get the full effect, you have to add the costs of inverters (PV makes DC, the inverters create AC from the DC), add the mounting and tracking equipment and the install labor.

Real total installed and running cost generally comes out about $7 to $10 per watt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm being gentle. nt :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Really? You can't say because you are ignorant of the use of numbers.
The demand for nuclear power has been sold out now for many decades, since it is the only form of baseload power that produces on an exajoule scale.

Of course you don't know what an exajoule is or wish to deny the existence of exajoules because it is impossible to be a reflexive nuclear opponent if one understands numbers.

The solar industry proved incompetent to expand even though it does not produce one exajoule of electrcity. Indeed it has proved incompetent to expand even though it does not produce 0.1 exajoules of electricity.

I love posting this spreadsheet, because the reflexive antinuclear set is so pathetic as to continuously pretend it doesn't exist.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table27.xls

Since 1980, the demand for nuclear power has increased by 1,934 billion kilowatt-hours. The increase in demand for nuclear power in that period produces all of the non-hydro renewables on earth, which are essentially insignificant, the most insignificant being solar electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is exactly the kind of thing Al Gore was talking about
when he discussed this in Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He came to me in a dream though and said that there are great oil fields
and coal reserves under the glaciers of Greenland.

He also said I would lose weight and regrow my hair and that I should trust my horoscope next September.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC