Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Grobal Food Crisis Emerging -- here it comes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 03:46 AM
Original message
Grobal Food Crisis Emerging -- here it comes
A press release -- one month ago.

How did I miss it?

A tip of the hat to Jim Warren, who also started a thread on it.

LOWEST FOOD SUPPLIES IN 50 OR 100 YEARS:
GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS EMERGING

SASKATOON, Sask.—Today, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) released its first projections of world grain supply and demand for the coming crop year: 2007/08. USDA predicts supplies will plunge to a 53-day equivalent—their lowest level in the 47-year period for which data exists.

“The USDA projects global grain supplies will drop to their lowest levels on record. Further, it is likely that, outside of wartime, global grain supplies have not been this low in a century, perhaps longer,” said NFU Director of Research Darrin Qualman.

Most important, 2007/08 will mark the seventh year out of the past eight in which global grain production has fallen short of demand. This consistent shortfall has cut supplies in half—down from a 115-day supply in 1999/00 to the current level of 53 days. “The world is consistently failing to produce as much grain as it uses,” said Qualman. He continued: “The current low supply levels are not the result of a transient weather event or an isolated production problem: low supplies are the result of a persistent drawdown trend.”

In addition to falling grain supplies, global fisheries are faltering. Reports in respected journals Science and Nature state that 1/3 of ocean fisheries are in collapse, 2/3 will be in collapse by 2025, and our ocean fisheries may be virtually gone by 2048. “Aquatic food systems are collapsing, and terrestrial food systems are under tremendous stress,” said Qualman.

Demand for food is rising rapidly. There is a worldwide push to proliferate a North Americanstyle meat-based diet based on intensive livestock production—turning feedgrains into meat in this way means exchanging 3 to 7 kilos of grain protein for one kilo of meat protein. Population is rising—2.5 billion people will join the global population in the coming decades. “Every six years, we’re adding to the world the equivalent of a North American population. We’re trying to feed those extra people, feed a growing livestock herd, and now, feed our cars, all from a static farmland base. No one should be surprised that food production can’t keep up,” said Qualman.

Qualman said that the converging problems of natural gas and fertilizer constraints, intensifying water shortages, climate change, farmland loss and degradation, population increases, the proliferation of livestock feeding, and an increasing push to divert food supplies into biofuels means that we are in the opening phase of an intensifying food shortage.

Qualman cautioned, however, that there are no easy fixes. “If we try to do more of the same, if we try to produce, consume, and export more food while using more fertilizer, water, and chemicals, we will only intensify our problems. Instead, we need to rethink our relation to food, farmers, production, processing, and distribution. We need to create a system focused on feeding people and creating health. We need to strengthen the food production systems around the world. Diversity, resilience, and sustainability are key,” concluded Qualman.

(See the entire release for the Backgrounder. Go to http://www.nfu.ca/press_releases/press/2007/May-07/food_supply_crisis___grain_stocks_use_ratio_release_THREE.pdf)

Will somebody please dig up the corpse of Julian Simon so we can kick its ass?

--p!

ADMIN/MODS: This is a press release and is intended for full quotation.
Thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. and a milk shortage

Dairy crisis hikes price of cheese and butter
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/12/wcheese112.xml

"The price of cheese and butter in shops is expected to shoot up over the next month as the full impact of a crisis in the global dairy market reaches shoppers' pockets in Britain.

Demand for dairy products from Asia has soared as affluent consumers in China switch to westernised diets

An acute drought in Australia and in parts of the United States has led to a shortage of milk powder - a key ingredient for some of the world's biggest food manufacturers."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Even bigger crisis is water- which is a factor in the food crisis
1/3 of U.S. states (including Florida) currently in major drought,
undergoing desertification and rapid drawdown in water table, salt water intrusion of aquifers,etc.
water wars over scarce water supplies everywhere.

And in many countries of Africa, Asia, Australia, etc. its even worse
droughts and desertification, declining food supplies, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. The alarming thing is the frenzy over ethanol
and the amount of good farmland that might go into production to produce it.

Jim Kunstler has an anecdotal comment on his website from a mid-western farmer lamenting the surge in ethanol demand will mean we'll piss away the last good six inches of topsoil in the grain belt supplying the idiocy of ethanol production.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Let alone the amount of oil required to produce the corn
from petroleum based fertilizers, to fuel for the farm machinery.

By the time you account for the energy cost, the net gain in energy is marginal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "Marginal"? You are too kind.
Ethanol from corn is a con job to use more oil. Why else would this administration push ethanol from corn and not any other viable source?

If the powers that be were serous about ethanol, they would be setting up using sugar beets. They left rot in the fields approximately 10% of last years crop because the sugar beet refineries could not handle the bumper corp. Sticking the farmer with the cost of growing the wasted crop.
Sugar beets has far more sugar than corn. Why not use the excessive crop that exceeds the capacity to be processed, instead of wasting the beets in the field and the costs that the farmer incurred growing that wasted portion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. and there is one more reason. jeb bush owns the company importing the ethanol
from brasil...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Poor harvest forecast in Ukraine
Hatrack has a thread on a small article at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x100123

Also: My apologies for the typo in the title. Dvorak typing is faster and easier, but the typos tend to be a lot harder to spot, and some of them are brutal!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I just assumed it was a Chinese article
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Triple Whammy when the sea Levels rise and them fkn Bees keep dying
We all know the Horror...and we still refuse to think of solutions....Hmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nature is getting ready to cleanse itself of
this weed species that is disrupting the harmony of the ecology. She has her own version of pest control. It will not be pleasant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. dust off your y2k survival guides
I knew they'd come in handy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. 300 000 000 people living in the mountains/woods/forests.. ..ain't gonna cut it...
only about 10,000 will end up surviving after 5 years....the rest will die due to lack of food and/or fighting for it....

who will make our toilets, our cell phones, our computers....who will make our stoves, our electricity, etc etc...??

We will be fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Will somebody please dig up the corpse of Julian Simon so we can kick its ass?
:rofl:

Paul Ehrlich and Dana Meadows were basically right- and it's going to be an "interesting" decade or two for the remaining cornucopians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. dieoff.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hankthecrank Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. So you want to whine about Ethanol

Are you going to help the poor out with food

Well you need to work on farm policy to change some problems first before you can worry about Ethanol

Lets just keep on about food prices but are we going to fix it.

Best land is still be converted to Mac mansions can't grow crops on the topsoil that's hauled away.

Still put crops on open market so the price the farmer gets doesn't reflect what it cost him to grow it.

Still let people who don't own crops or make any food bet on Food futures!
So letting them change what poor people pay for food. It also affects the people who actual do grow the food.

Why do we put limits on where food is grown or animals in town? Oh we want to move to the land but we don't want the smells. We want to eat but we don't want to put up with the smells.

Why do we mix human manure with chemical waste with our sewage system so said manure can't be put on the land which made the food? Only people would think that they cheat the system. All manure should go into methane digesters so capture that energy than to the land that made the crops.

Why do we grow so much landscape grass? Does that feed anyone.

Why no concern over golf course do they feed anyone?

Or Sod farms do they feed anyone?

Should we grow cotton to make things to wear or should we grow food?

Do we need to grow tobacco is this food?

Or why do we grow only male landscape bushes and trees? (so we don't have to clean up seeds)(That feed the birds and other who live here with us.

Why don't we use road way ditches to grow crops instead of grass? Some is harvested but most is wasted.

Bio fuels will be a big part of this. Making food and transport will good use of bio fuels. If people have to walk or well.

How big is your yard maybe we should have a say on what you grow also. Maybe we should tell you what you will now grow!

Are we going to change farm policy that just trying to make farms bigger and bigger? Small farm are the best, said farmer knows every inch and gets the most out of it while doing the least damage.

Are we going to change milk supports? Now they are paid a per mileage price from how far they are away from Wisconsin. So now we have dairy's being put up in Utah and Ca. Some is needed for local use but it really to get the better price. Should we have diary where water is short supply/

Even if ethanol goes away corn belt still going to grow corn and beans.
So how does making ethanol make the topsoil go away? When the main thing to make ethanol is still going to be raised.
ah but its not going away

Why do we get upset about what farmers get for their crops? But when General Mills charges over $4.00 for a box of cereal its okay!

Diesel fuel has been high for two years that is in the cost of all things. But its much better to whine about ethanol.

We need a people co-op. So can decide how land is used. So we can form work groups to harvest food.

I'm guessing that rain will fall like it has in the last while. Some times not enough other times a whole years supply in just a couple of hours. Now we put up parking lots with drains that water flows right into the streams and you have flood outs. We will need beavers to control water flow. We need barn swallows and bats to eat up insects if with global warming makes climate hot. Oh but we don't want their nest close to our house it messes up the paint!

I know why don't you guys just take over the land grow stuff yourself. Nah then you would have to take the risks that farmers have every year! Much better to sell stuff to farmers and take the money that way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I would venture a guess that
somewhere embedded in your rant their is a heartfelt, cogent argument, but with the fragmented form as is it's not working.

Frankly it sounds like your using facts like a drunk uses a lamp post.....more to steady himself than for illumination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Good points
I hate lawns. Lawns are the STUPIDEST use of land EVER. Next to fucking PARKING LOTS.Anyways I grow the female plants too. I toss seed balls around.I don't mind seeds and stuff falling in my yard.I let my yard grass go weedy and seedy on purpose..Why? Because I like seeing the birds squirrels and rabbits fat and happy.My neighbors are hilarious, their yard grass gets past 4 inches and on cue they are all out on those damn mowers. What a waste of time.My yard has the look of prairie grass In the wind ,it looks like a sea of velvet green hair moving in waves. I think it's beautiful during a storm watching the wind blow on the long grasses here. And since there is no"neighborhood control freak association", the neighbors if they don't like my mini prairie where the rabbits and wildlife roam..can kiss my ass too..Fuckem and their obedience to this suburban mono-culture blight.

I stand up for the critters though out here in the sprawl where I live it's slowly killing me inside with loneliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Sprawl must end
It was a tremendous mistake.

I personally do not revulse at lawns. It's the whole system of sprawl and monoculture I object to -- the economic regime that enforces industrialization of nature and humanity. Industry was a tremendous breakthrough for human civilization, but it's only good for making things, not for regimenting the way we live.

The lawns are of little concern. In a few years, when better sense starts to prevail (after several painful blows to our way of life), the 'burbs will be shuttered, the megalopoli will be rezoned, and there will be a renaissance of well-planned towns and ecologically sound industry. It is just a shame that it will have had to take so long.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. If more companies used railroad transit instead of trucking, diesel fuel consumption would drop.
There was an interesting TV commercial recently promoting rail transit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. (your post, while excellent - is almost unreadable; might want to work on
that punctuation a tad)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
18. It's articles like this that make me mad when I see people waste food.
More importantly, maybe we need to stop 2.5 billion people from being added? 6.5 billion people is plenty.

But the people in the countries with the worst population rates are seeing booming economies. We can only hope this keeps them from breeding, much in the same way Americans are criticized for not making enough children of their own.

(I know, let's all take fertility pills so mommy can endure 4.5 months' pregnancy, hosting 6 babies who'll all be born early and die because that period of natural gestation is way too short, not to mention unnatural. :crazy: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. The population can't grow forever
Luckily the advances in food production over the past century kept up with the population, but there is going to be a point where we can't support ourselves and people will start to die off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Sure we can
Ever hear of Soylent Green? That's what our future holds for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
user_name Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. "What the World Eats" - slightly off-topic, but fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. amazing difference in price of food per week over the globe
and all the packaged foods, cereals. Buy in bulk, it's cheaper, better for the environment! Very interesting photo essay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC