Interesting opinion.
May 29, 2006
There are those reading my weekly columns that assume I am anti-gambling and that is true to a certain extent.
I find it appalling that so many Native Americans are losing money they can ill afford to lose in the casinos built on their reservations intended to improve economic opportunities for all members of the tribe. If a tribal member is employed at the casino and is addicted to gambling that employee will inevitably put every paycheck back into the coffers of the casino. That may improve the bottom line of the casino but it is hardly beneficial to those employees.
It is also disturbing to me when tribal members that have lived in peace and harmony, side-by-side for generations, suddenly find themselves at odds over tribal membership. In some areas of California tribal members thought to be questionable by their elected governments are simply removed from the tribal rolls. In a recent case involving the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians of California that went all of the way to the U. S. Supreme Court, those members expelled from the tribe appear to have permanently lost their status as tribal members. The Supreme Court merely went with a lower court ruling that upheld the tribal government’s actions.
I believe that none of this would have happened if it had not been for the success of the tribe’s casino. The smaller the tribe the larger the per capita checks awarded each month. I don’t know if this was the case with the Pechanga Band, but there must have been some mitigating circumstances that caused them to remove certain tribal members from their rolls.
more...
http://www.nativetimes.com/index.asp?action=displayarticle&article_id=7880