Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why We Need Martial Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:58 PM
Original message
Why We Need Martial Law
Why We Need Martial Law
Criminal Government Is Destroying America -
Military Must Step In To Restore The Constitution
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net
6-16-4

Our government is out of control. The elections are rigged. The Congress is completely bought off. The White House administration is a gang of criminals who are stealing the nation blind. There is no proper accountability from any department of government. And the United States is conducting two major wars, irresponsibly squandering the lives of our young people, for reasons that everyone in the world knows are lies.

Be clear about this: no government official, nor any major media outlet, is objecting to two wars the United States is conducting that everyone knows the reasons for are lies. Tens of thousands of people have been killed for lies, and no one in a position of public responsibility is condemning it.

America has become a nation of monstrously perverted mass murderers. And if you're an American and are not condemning it, then you are complicit in it. You're supporting needless mass murder, you pig!

People are being jailed for no reason, illegally tortured while in custody and deprived of due process. Innocent families around the world are being humiliated and killed for no legitimate reason. Our law enforcement apparatus - corrupt courts and cops - are failing to stop obvious crimes committed by the very rich, and assaulting ordinary citizens trying in a lawful manner to protest these injustices. . .

_________

Comment
From Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
6-16-4

1. I have never disagreed with any of John's articles, until now. Here are the reasons I give, some of which have already appeared in a some of my past essays: . . .

_________

Comment
From Jean Gordon
6-17-4

I fully agree and applaud you for this wonderfully explicit work of journalism. It's hard to resist the need to put things in black and white, especially when it becomes clear that THEY thrive on "incrontrovertable confusion!" . . .

_________


All of the above can be found in its entirety at:http://www.rense.com/general53/ggyr.htm

TYY

I'm posting this because I found the initial post and its followup comments to be an interesting read. I'm still ruminating on their meaning and have come to no final conclusion at this time.


Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Bush cheats his way back in
and articles of impeachment aren't filed quickly, I honestly think the military may take action. Much of the command structure realizes how badly the Bush gang have bungled everything they've touched, and they also realize that more wars would be started were they to get another 4 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Colin Powell wrote a research paper on this very idea
but his was based on a left wing take over of the government. now it looks like Powell`s paper should be changed to a right wing take over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. John Kaminski is a worthless piece of Nazi filth. He is a holocaust
revisionist, a firm believer in the "Jewish conspiracy" and the "Jewish-controlled press", and at least a lukewarm defender of Nazi Germany. Start at http://www.worldnewsstand.net/04/John_Kaminski/24.htm and dig in for proof.

Why are you posting this glop on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I told you why I posted it . . .
. . . at the bottom.

"I'm posting this because I found the initial post and its followup comments to be an interesting read. I'm still ruminating on their meaning and have come to no final conclusion at this time."

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. I forgot to include . . .
. . . one of the more interesting comments:

Comment
By Muehlbauer
6-17-4

I always enjoy reading what John has to say. In this review, I think he exposes a lot of the illegality that is a big part of America's government and courts today. Just as illegality has been a big part of the American government and courts for a long time, it has become most obvious though since the advent of the Federal Reserve, World War One, after that the Second World War.

I agree with every word John writes in this report, except, I should not be intimidated as to call the problems we have here in America as being problems assisted by or mandated by Israel. Rather, I would put the mark more squarely on the House of Rothschild, assisted by other English Royalty, the Queen of England, and, the International Bankers. . .

You can read the rest of this comment to the original post at: http://www.rense.com/general53/ggyr.htm

TYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. This idea is against everything that the U.S. and the Constitution stands
for. The military serves at the authority of the civilian government, and only acts to protect the country from outside threats. As Ben Franklin said we have to keep our government and not expect the military to save us. This is the rule so that the military may not be used to support a dictatorship. Only the ballot box will save us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who says we do?
There was a period when Rome had as many as 50 different emperors who marched in at the head of an army and found themselves deposed and replaced shortly afterwards.

It makes me think about the dysfunctional legacy of Simon Bolivar in South America.
As screwed up as things are now, would you trust political leadership to an unaccountable and unelected official.... kinda like the current president - only under martial law things would be far worse.

You could kiss your 4th amendment rights goodby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Aug 14th 2018, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC