Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC launches public attack on Murdoch 'imperialism'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 09:36 AM
Original message
BBC launches public attack on Murdoch 'imperialism'
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/media/story.jsp?story=436930

BBC launches public attack on Murdoch 'imperialism'By Vincent Graff, Media and Culture Editor25 August 2003

The controller of BBC1 launched an unprecedented attack on Rupert Murdoch yesterday, calling the media billionaire a "capital imperialist" who wants to destabilise the corporation because he "is against everything the BBC stands for".Lorraine Heggessey said Mr Murdoch's continued attacks on the BBC stemmed from a dislike of the public sector. But he did not understand that the British people "have a National Health Service, a public education system" and trust organisations that are there for the benefit of society and not driven by profit.Her controversial comments, in an interview with The Independent, are believed to be the first time a senior BBC executive has publicly attacked the motives of the media tycoon. They follow an intensification of anti-BBC rhetoric from Mr Murdoch's side.The BBC has been alarmed by the increasingly close relationship between the Government and Mr Murdoch's British newspapers, at a time when the BBC's relationship with New Labour is strained as never before. The frostiness of the relationship has raised speculation that the Government will consider abolishing the licence fee in its forthcoming review of the BBC's charter.Ms Heggessey's remarks will cheer supporters of the corporation who fear the BBC has kept quiet for too long in the face of attack from Mr Murdoch and his most senior employees.Her comments come in the wake of a speech to the country's senior broadcasting executives by Tony Ball, chief executive of British Sky Broadcasting, in which Mr Murdoch's News Corporation is the major shareholder.Mr Ball told the Edinburgh International Television Festival last week that the BBC ought to be forced to sell its most successful programmes, such as EastEnders, Casualty and Have I Got News For You to its commercial rivals, who would screen all future episodes instead. The money raised by such sales should then be ploughed into experimental programming, he said.Executives at the BBC and elsewhere see the plan as a Murdoch-inspired attempt to cripple the corporation by depriving it of its most popular shows - and the large audiences that go with them.Mr Ball told a questioner at the festival that it "would not be such a disaster" if the BBC were eventually to become a marginal broadcaster.<snip>

In his speech, Mr Ball proposed two further restrictions to be placed on the BBC, which he argued would prevent the corporation it from straying too far into territory he regards as the sole domain of commercial broadcasters such as his own.The BBC should be banned from buying any foreign-made material, he said. This would prevent the BBC from pushing up the price of American sitcoms, Hollywood movies and Australian soap operas, the staples of many commercial channels. "I really cannot see why public money is being diverted to those poor struggling Hollywood studios," he said.Ms Heggessey said BBC1 did not run any overseas-originated programmes during peak time but "the audience expects us to run movies and we do". <snip>






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. My thoughts on this...
Isn't a "capital imperialist" the same as a fascist?

Upon inauguration of the new Democratic president in January 05' (can we make it till then?), one of his first orders of business should be, by executive order, the immediate re-imposition of the "Fairness Doctrine". His second order of business, should be to order his *new* Attorney General to charge nearly all of the major media companies in this nation, with RICO violations (this of course, after arresting the *old* AG for said/same). The third order of business, should be the prosecution of all those in the media who have conspired with the Bush regime (especially Murdoch, FOX, GE-NBC, N.Y. Times, Washington Post, Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Rielly, and Savage-Weiner), on charges of treason and sediton, with the stipulation that there will be no pardons or probations, and further, that "ultimate" penalties will be sought.

It's what they deserve, and the price for nearly destroying our nation. As soon as the Democratic nomineee is selected, we should all urge everyone we know to write the nominee, demanding they take the actions listed above, upon inauguration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I like you're thinking Flying_Pig
(If that, in fact, is your real name). You've hit on something that I hold dear: the enforcement of the law. Welcome. Keep posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks Rock...
I WILL keep posting. BTW, is "Rock" your "real" name?? LOL! For the record, real name is "Mike"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree - Reagan's veto of the renewal of the Fairness Doctrine in 87
should have led to impeachment.

But as usual the Democratic party members were too nice - to a GOP that takes no prisoners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC