Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSM/Knight Rider/WH Correspondents refuse to think Gannon a Bush plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:28 AM
Original message
MSM/Knight Rider/WH Correspondents refuse to think Gannon a Bush plant
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ep/20050228/en_bpiep/whitehousecorrespondentswantnoroleincredentialing

Mon Feb 28, 6:30 PM ET
Editor and Publisher
---------------------------------------
NEW YORK The White House Correspondents Association announced Monday that it would not seek changes to the White House press-credentialing process, despite complaints from several members that controversial former reporter James Guckert had been able to gain the same access as any other reporter for two years.

Ron Hutcheson, WHCA president and a Knight Ridder White House correspondent, said the decision occurred during Monday's meeting of the WHCA board. It was the first such meeting of the board since Guckert, who uses the name Jeff Gannon, drew attention with his partisan questions and questionable past.

"The board felt like none of us were happy about Gannon being in the briefing room, but we all view it as the price we pay for a system that favors inclusion over keeping someone out," Hutcheson told E&P. "While not perfect, is geared toward letting people in."

When asked if his view would change in the event that there was a sharp increase in the distribution of day passes for bloggers, writers affiliated with obscure Web sites, and those with obvious partisan leanings, like Guckert, Hutcheson said such a scenario could require a new look. "I do have that concern that we could end up there," he said. "I'll never say never. But I have no idea what the tipping point would be."

He also added that none of the board members at the meeting believed that Guckert was "a plant" by the Bush administration to insert "softball" questions into the daily briefings.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&u=/ep/20050228/en_bpiep/whitehousecorrespondentswantnoroleincredentialing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. The point is, that they don't have a system of inclusion. They
sealed their fate when they denied passes to legitimate journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Asystem that favors inclusion over keeping someone out ...
Translation: A system where they fear if anyone speaks up about Guckert's inclusion, they'll be kept out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. 
[link:www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html|Click
here] to review the message board rules.
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're taking a page right out of the bush playbook................
admit to nothing, everything is just fine the way it is and they see no reason to change anything. Doing so would be an admission of "being wrong", and as we all know, the bushies are NEVER wrong.
BUT, if a horde of Liberal Bloggers wanted the same treatment that Gannon/Guckert got, they may have to revisit the procedure. :eyes:

Next, if all goes according to established patterns, these people will be given some sort of award for their meritorious service. :crazy: It makes perfect sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkie Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. this is a good thing, GOP would blame correspondents association in future
its not the media that makes the rules on propaganda and they shouldn't be put in the situation of having to make judgements on other media organisations.
i'm sure one could of pictured bush&co blaming the whitehouse correspondents association for gannon's access to the whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. tell them
WHCA Office
1920 N Street, NW
Suite 300
Washington, D.C.
20036

PHONE 202-452-4836


President of White House Correspondents Association
Ron Hutcheson

[email protected]
Phone: (202) 383-6057
Fax: (202) 383-6075
Address: Washington Bureau, Washington, DC 20045
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC