Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Backer Rangel criticizes Clinton over non-concession speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:44 PM
Original message
Backer Rangel criticizes Clinton over non-concession speech
CNN: June 4, 2008
Rangel criticizes Clinton over non-concession speech
From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney


Rangel criticized Clinton's non-concession speech Wednesday.

(CNN) — Prominent Hillary Clinton backer Charles Rangel thinks the New York senator could have been "far more generous" during her speech Tuesday night after it was clear Barack Obama had clinched the Democratic nomination. Rangel, the senior member of the New York congressional delegation and an early supporter of Clinton’s presidential campaign, said in an interview Wednesday Clinton should have been more clear about what her future plans are.

"I would agree that after the math was in before her speech, that she could have been far more generous in terms of being more specific and saying that she wants a Democratic victory," Rangel said in an interview on MSNBC.

"I don't see what they're talking about in prolonging this," Rangel added. "There's nothing to prolong if you're not going to take the fight to the convention floor…I don't know why she could not have been more open in terms of doing up front what she intends to do later."

Rangel also said the entire New York congressional delegation is awaiting guidance from Clinton on what to do, and could be put "on the spot" if the New York senator does not explain herself soon.

"We could be on the spot if we don't get some answers about what does it mean when you say that you are not endorsing — or what does it mean when you say that you haven't — you're not out of the race. It just doesn't make any sense. It's inconsistent with wanting a Democratic victory and not endorsing the Democratic candidate."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/04/rangel-criticizes-clinton-over-non-concession-speech/
Refresh | +6 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then why don't you (Rangel) officially back Obama today. set an example.
All of you. Show what you feel. Change your endorsements to Obama. I think that would make everything very clear, no?
I voted for Edwards. I really wanted Edwards to be our president. Now I clearly and officially back Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. 8 senators and 23 congressmen called her and told her to stop.
apparently, people are saying, she BADLY misinterpreted her support. people are howling mad, she put them into a bad spot. her people want to be released to endorse Obama. She is in shit with a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As she should be.. I'm just glad
there's this many supporter hilary who actually do care about our party more than what hilary wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC