|
This is from a friend of mine, posted to a yahoo group. I find him to be DEAD ON. Read away:
I don't know if my opinion here is minority or unpopular. Maybe if I say it is, I will be taken more seriously. That seems to be how the media works. But I wanna know why so many Democrats on this stage turn tail and run at the first difficultly with the media?
The media will be spoiling for anyone who represents a change in direction in the Dem party. Self-inflicted? Get real. Denial? Acknowledgement.
Take, for instance, the contentions concerning Dean's speech after the caucuses you mention.
If Dean had given that speech after placing first, you'd be praising his rallying cry.
Have you ever seen a film of Teddy Roosevelt? He makes Dean look more sedate and slow than John Kerry on animal tranquilizers.
I'm highly, I want emphasize, HIGHLY disappointed in Democrats who continue to insist that Dean should never have mentioned the confederate flag, that the symbol is "too charged with reminders of slavery." 'Scuse me, but that symbol is in the news every week, whether someone is trying to remove it from a statehouse or whatever.
You KNOW Dean was widely misquoted about it. You KNOW African-American audiences have applauded him for it for months. You KNOW you can't talk about race in America today without that flag coming up. You KNOW we have to have that discussion (especially if you were at the Durham Dems meeting last night). You KNOW the South needs that discussion. You KNOW that running around with the confederate flag isn't just some innocent form of rebellion that Yankees do too. You KNOW what Dean said was the truth. You KNOW you should be proud of him for it.
But you let the press tell you what to think and then say about it? Carter and Clinton had both gone through far greater ridicule by this point. You should be CAPITALIZING on the flag flap. The only reason the campaign had pause to comment about it is that the grassroots were not vociferous enough in their outrage at the media spin. We just left out friend twisting in the wind to defend himself against a "When did you stop beating your wife?" type of question. There's *nothing* a candidate could say that would come out smelling good in such a situation and that is very much not self-inflicted. But there's plenty WE could say.
You know, every chance I get when someone discusses that flag flap, I walk them through it. I have Dean's quote memorized word to word. And in each case the person I discuss it with will have to come around and admit, "Well, I didn't know he said it like that," or "I understand now what he meant." Sometimes there's some protest that, "Well, he shouldn't say things that are going to be misinterpreted like that."
But I've got to keep the heat on people that he will be misinterpreted no matter what he says and if we have to accept the media's misinterpretation of events, we might as well roll over and die now. You'll never lack for people who will read your forthrightness for being mean or hateful or angry or crazy or whatever. And you cannot let such people keep you from being forthright. We can't win this election in the media. We can only win by representing a change in this party and in this country to the people with whom we come in contact, and multiply that contact.
About the only thing in Iowa I can fault Dean for is pulling Meathead and Josiah Barlett/Captain Willard up on stage with him. Sometimes I wonder if it's such a good idea to bombard Iowans with legions of college kids skipping class. But I figure for every farmer turned off by it, there's a homemaker who thinks its a good thing our young people are getting involved.
I tell you what. Whoever the nominee is will have my support. But until the nominee is decided and NOT BEFORE, I am not ready to reach out to candidates who voted for the President's unilateral war on Iraq. I am not ready to out reach to candidates who voted for the President's property tax increase. I am ESPECIALLY not ready to reach out to candidates who say they want to keep the President's property tax increase and call it a "middle class" cut in the same breath. I am not ready to reach out to other candidates who attack other candidates for attacking other candidates and call that logic a "positive message of hope." I am not ready to reach out to other candidates who appropriate Dean's positions and slogans and then slag Dean. I am not ready to reach out to candidates who talk about "hope" and "positive message" and then have no substance or record of achievement other than graduating from college. I am not ready to reach out to Bush lite or baby kissers.
See, I don't believe any of that is going to beat Dubya. I KNOW Dean is that only Dem who can. This is not being "ideologically bound to any candidate." This being practically bound to some obvious facts. We need our country back. Not more of the same.
However, what I am ready to do is to ask any Democrat who caves into Fox-like propaganda to please get a spine. Apply your energies to something productive like a letter to the editor propagating some real principle. Don't sully me with your doubts. The idea that the best candidate will just magically appear from the primary contests is a bunch of "logic of the market" styled bologna.
The market regularly produces the lowest common denominator. Dubya himself is the product of the contest system. We can do better than that. But not by accepting media spin or shifting ourselves in response to polls.
If we are not vigilant, if we are do not stand up for ourselves, this "inferno," as you call it, will burn our chances of taking our country back and leave us with a candidate we cannot be excited about ourselves or get anybody else excited about. And THAT, my friend, is what would be "politically naive."
Talk to me about other candidates after July and only if you have to. In the meantime, question and counter the nutty, angry, irrational, hateful, mean, crazy, out of control media spin with every breath, please.
|