Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you marry someone who loves you but isn't "in love" with you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:34 PM
Original message
Poll question: Would you marry someone who loves you but isn't "in love" with you?
How important is romantic love?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take option 4
I wouldn't marry someone either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I agree completely, option 4 for me too
been there, done that, lost half my shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:40 PM
Original message
I think many would...Hell a year and a half ago I would of..
Edited on Mon Apr-02-07 06:40 PM by GoPsUx
But now i am in a better place and the answer is Hell NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course, IMHO, but a loveless marriage is an "arrangement"
It may work, but it's risky enough under normal circumstances. Why make it even riskier?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I did, and won't do it again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. What does that mean, anyway? I always hear...
silly little college girls talk about stuff like that. "I love him, but i'm not 'in love' with him."

WTF? Either you love him or you don't.

It sounds like they've been watching too many lifetime movies.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Not lifetime
too much MTV reality shows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. A co-worker said it to me once.
About her boyfriend. She was 40.

She's definitely a Lifetime addict.

But yeah, I guess with the "me generation," it's an MTV thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I think it's said by people who expect "love" to be a never-ending
ride of passion and electricity. When the first throes of passion and lust subside, they think the "love" is gone, not realizing that it exists on a deeper level and high intensity passion cannot be maintained indefinitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Beautifully said.
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Well said!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. I love my friend Jay.
I'm not in love with him. He's my friend.
I love my Dad.
I love my Uncle.
I love my cousin.
There are other kinds of love. 'in love' with = romantic love, in my experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. exactly
Being "in love" is a stage, usually more properly called "in lust". But that goes away, and then there's just loving each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. isnt that someones way of telling you they arent attracted to you and they dont find you exciting?
Edited on Mon Apr-02-07 06:55 PM by lionesspriyanka
so NO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. As far as I know, yes.
I don't think anyone should ever use the phrase "I love you but I'm not in love with you" past the 10th grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. their fat wallet will cover a lot of ground in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. No. What that means is "I love you like a sister" and I already have a sibling.
Relationship-wise, I'd never settle for that. Nor do I have any interest in making a legal commitment to relationship permanence, but that's my own personal bias and I wouldn't look down on anybody else for feeling differently.

As a practical matter, "love but not in love" usually means two friends who are scared or lonely to go look for who they really need when they have something safe enough. I've never really seen it end well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. What is "in love" - sexual chemistry (aka 'hormones')?
Surely the emotion of love ought to transcend fleeting hormonal response?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Okay, serious answer here
One of the strongest marriages I know is between two people who are not "in love" with each other. My friend and his wife have been married going on 8 years - they have two kids and a very nice relationship.

My friend wanted badly to be a father and had never found someone he loved deeply to partner with - his wife wanted children and a secure future and had not found it anywhere. They met, discovered they had mutual goals and decided to make it work. And it has.

They appreciate and respect each other and have a great affection for each other. I would not say either is in love with the other but I suspect over time, that may happen. Or it may not. Both are happy in the relationship and they get great joy from their children.

The thing is, while I think love is wonderful and important to a point, a relationship can not be forged only on that basis. There has to be shared goals, ideals and interests that will bind a couple together beyond the initial attractions. Most successful long-term couples that I know tell me their love has grown over the time they've been together. That tells me that if people like my friend and his wife are clear and honest with each other, the possibility of love after marriage is there.

There have been plenty of successful arranged marriages throughout history. I sometimes think people put too much emphasis on romantic love or mistake sexual excitement for love. Then they're disappointed when it fades and they find there's nothing else to hold them together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. love?
overrated

marry for money or sex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. For money? How far will that prenup get ya? As for sex, one would get further...
herpes, syphilis, aids, gonorrhea, bankruptcy... oh dear, either way, money kills the mood. If not the crabs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I know two people who got married because one needed health insurance
They were already living together and loved each other but one of them never would have married again if he didn't desperately need the insurance. Its been over a year, and they're still married and living together, and he still needs the insurance. Who can say?

Weirdly, only straight people would be allowed to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. I know a couple who were together 18 years before getting married
And they only did it then because they were getting hosed on taxes filing separately. It was weird, they'd already raised her two kids together, been together almost two decades, through health problems and unexpectedly early grandparenthood, and all the sudden, *poof* their relationship had legitimacy. Funny what a piece of paper can do.

On the other hand, it was a decent excuse for a party. I made their cake. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I seriously doubt it.
I'm completely spoiled, and I have no intention of marrying anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wha? What's the difference? Why are you asking?
Mrs R says there's a difference, but I can't understand what she's saying because, well, because I'm kinda dim.

But you knew that.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Depends on the M-O-N-E-Y!!
:headbang:


Heck YEAH! Ain't it that way for everyone???



:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. You're in trouble, babe...
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Well then, I'll just keep the rich one around as a boyfriend.
:headbang: Best of BOTH worlds, baby!

Unless you want for us to move to Utah? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Utah?!?!
HELL no. :P

I like when men give you money. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Absolutely NOT!
romantic love is extremely important to me. I'm lucky to still have it, 15 yrs later....yes, it changes over the years, but we're still IN LOVE.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. How about "other"?
Sometimes I just don't know about the whole "in love" thing. "In love" is a state of being, while romance is one relationship component that occurs periodically (sometimes frequently, sometimes not)...and yes, I think romance is an important component to a relationship. However, I used to work with DV victims. I frequently heard "...but I'm in love with him/her" from both parties. The problem was one of power and lack of respect.

Anyway, ongoing friendship and warm companionship, with some romance thrown in are the most important mainstays of a relationship for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. I knew I would get great answers from you guys.
From several different points of view.

One of the special qualities of this place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. Honestly, if they were my friend...
Possibly.
IF they weren't, then I'd check to see how much money they had.
Just being honest.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. How much money?
:sarcasm:



Did they say they weren't in love with you? :shrug:

Lots of people have gotten married, in the past, without being in love and it lasted.
Of course, divorce wasn't an option back then either; so they worked through the BS.

I guess it depends on the circumstances and who the players are...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lost-in-nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. NO!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
I have been married 30 years and got this speech.....

DO NOT DO IT.....



lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. Tits on a stick, no!
Jesus, I've got enough issues as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
37. At t this point in time
it would take a shit load of money for me to consider another marriage. And I mean a shit load!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
38. Nope.
It would be like settling, all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC