Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eight people were laid off from work

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 08:43 PM
Original message
Eight people were laid off from work
today. Among them a woman who had worked 20 years for the company. This is the thanks she gets.

Another of the victims was a woman in her late 50s or early 60s, who worked so that she and her sick husband would have health insurance. Isn't America grand, where one's access to health care is contingent upon continued employment with a company that provides health insurance.

I hate to see this happen any time of year but during the winter seems particularly cruel. I don't think a lot of companies hire during the winter and right before Christmas.

When asked if there would be additional layoffs one of the VPs said he was not at liberty to say, which IMHO, means yes there will be more.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's happening everywhere.
Even government, where people have bizarre misconceptions about how their workers get easy treatment and excess pay and a lifelong soup ticket, are being whittled away, if not eliminated left'n'right.

(I know many Minnesota governmental programs, when you call their numbers, you get somebody in India... Lord knows what we don't know about the DATA being stored over there and I bet there's tons of it...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestMomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. How cruel to lay off people right before Christmas
Being laid off is such a kick in the gut at anytime but this time of year really sucks.

I remember 20 years ago, the company I worked for had a big layoff and they had a 'counselor' come in and talk to those that were left. He said the days when you worked for one company and retired with a gold watch were over and not to think that your employer had any loyalty to you.

I was an impressionable 20 something and that really stuck with me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah the employer is quick to say they
have no loyalty to you but demand absolute loyalty FROM you. Well, no employer gets loyalty from me. I do my job but am always looking for opportunities to learn new stuff and take advantage of any classes they are willing to pay for.

When I talk about the company for which I work it is never in the corporate we (just as I don't say we when speaking of the US).

Just feeling incredibly sad right now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. B-I-N-G-O-!
Having learned recently of how little my company appreciates me, I've been tempted to walk out. Or swallow my pride, smile, and live while I still have a job because the market speaks for itself regarding us having a viable future.

So far I'm swallowing and smiling, but I might end up spitting in the end. And they know I am valuable. Though I know I too am dispensible; but the glut of fools with silver tongues are more likely to get jobs than the truly talented with "speech impediments".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. A seminar I went to over the summer says that
part time jobs are incrasingly norm, with full time jobs being very difficult to come by. Expected span in a given job is now 5 years max. Benefits are zilch. Pay wasn't mentioned, but we all know that's droppin' too.

I didn't attend the remaining days' worth; my heart was shatted by the new facts of business and how many other people in the class were still lovey-dovey over corporate execs, wanting to meet them so they could learn what it takes to get rich. (which is rather obvious: Get to market with something before anyone else and hype it up. Then use any sleazy method to reduce 'costs' to boost your profits.) These fools need not look at how to make it big but how those who have made it big are squeezing us until we get squished to death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. To become a corporate exec in the US
one must first be part of the class that creates corporate execs. Why do you think upper middle class and rich folks send their kids to private school and then encourage them to join fraternities and sororities? NETWORKING!!! Affluent folks learn how to network and work their connections early in life.

The myth of class mobility is just that A MYTH. In the US one pretty much dies in the class to which one was born.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's sad.
It can all come and go so quickly.

Makes me think so much more of starting my own business. At least if you're working for yourself, you know things are slow--there's no one to surprise you with a lay off. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Which is why I have a few little part time at home businesses
and am trying to expand into yet another.
I have to work two jobs to make nearly the same amount I did just three years ago. Home-based businesses give me a few options for some extra money and I would love to get enough business to be able to work them fulltime instead of my current job(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is there any way
of proving age discrimination was a factor? And, they probably "needed" to get rid of the one with the sick husband because it was raising the company's premiums. Unfortunately, at their ages, they are majorily screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. While there may have been age
discrimination, I think it's not only hard to prove under normal circumstances, a layoff is one way to discriminate in many ways and not face legal repercussions. All the company has to say is the jobs were eliminated, when in reality the work still exists it will be merged in with another job and someone else will have to work twice as hard for the same pay.

CAPITALISM SUCKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. All the employee has to do is retain a lawyer and give notice
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 09:19 PM by DainBramaged
of intent of litigation and chances are a LARGE settlement will occur. These scum fear a long protracted lawsuit and public/client opinion against them for laying off "Grandma" is not in their best interest.

Fuck 'em, sue 'em. They hate us, for we are cattle to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Don't bet on that
I was one of seven people fired about two years ago from a small daily newspaper. All were over 40, and there were was some greater evidence of discrimination, such as one employee being told before he was fired, "Your old ways aren't going to make it here anymore." Plus, the people hired to replace us were all under 27.

We had a lawyer who specializes in employee discrimination, and it seemed like a pretty solid case. But then things started to unravel (I can't say what — gag order) and we ended up settling for a small amount. Again, I can't say how much, but it was about one-third my annual salary, which was pretty damned small itself.

In a discrimination case, you have to prove the employer's intent was to get rid of older workers. The fact that all those fired were older isn't enough. You've got to have as much supporting evidence as you can get your hands on, and employers these days are too smart — or, their lawyers and HR people are — to make it obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Must have been a Gannett Paper?
Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Nope
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 10:10 PM by Oeditpus Rex
If it had been, we never would've gotten as far as depositions. They would've just "disappeared" us.

It was a small chain in Kollyforniya that no longer exists under its corporate name at the time this happened.



Edit: For the record, Gannett really isn't any worse than any of the other big chains. It just has the worst rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. When people say the economy is good
ask for specifics. Ask how many Americans have health insurance. Ask how many Americans have adequate reserves for retirement. Ask how increased gasoline prices, home heating prices, and rising college costs impact family budgets...compared to those measly tax cuts for the middle-class. Not exactly keeping up, right? Sure, the economy is booming for the oil execs. And those feeding off the teats of the military industrial complex. But not for middle America. People who work for companies for twenty years or more could lose their pensions.
And then there's the under-employed.
The people I know who have lost their jobs, and there are many, have found other jobs. But they're less than what they had before. They pay less. And the benefits are less. If at all. Under-employment is pervasive. There are jobs. But they don't pay well. American workers have little clout.
People may demonize unions. But without them, our country wouldn't have built a large, thriving middle-class as quickly. The policemen, firemen, teamsters, teachers, and factory workers organized for living wages, pensions, and benefits.
Now. We're being de-valued. We're being marked down. We're all losing ground. And half of our number are siding with the forces that are causing our decline.
Hard to understand, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. 20 years is 10x longer than I've held a job
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 10:03 PM by Jack_Dawson
Not to minimize, but she had a great run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. The last corporation we were under laid off every Dec
They were bastards beyond belief. Massive layoffs while the VPs were getting clothing and transportation allowances. I'm talking transportation as in buying them a new car every year - which they didn't need to drive anywhere else. Tuition for their kids etc.

I'm so glad we were sold and away from them :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC