VOTE IN THE CNN POLL

[MidwestTransplant]

http://www.cnn.com/

Are casualties higher than you expected?

So far, yes is winning but it needs help.

[NC_Nurse]

1. Done.

[trotsky]

2. Another bogus poll from the Crap News Network.

A "no" answer could mean "No, I expected that we would lose this many troops to fight terrorism" OR "No, I had feared the corrupt Bush gang would kill at least this many of our brave troops in their stupid war."

[Myrina]

3. but ...

from us, the 'We told ya so' side of the fence, shouldn't we be voting no ?? - vs. those who believed Bush's bullshit that the 'war' would be a 'cakewalk' ...

I'm confused.

:shrug:

[otohara]

4. There Weren't Supposed To Be Any

deaths, remember POS CNN, none - flowers and candy

[Racenut20]

5. That is a totally pointless poll.

[amber dog democrat]

6. I said no

I dont know if there is a right answer there. I am also pessimistic in regard to this occupation and invasion.

[troublemaker]

7. I voted no

During Mission Accomplished week I predicted 900 more dead by election day, so I can't pretend this is unexpected.

[LeftPeopleFinishFirst]

8. I said no

The amount of casualties was predictable.