Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

whats the big deal about F911 censorship?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:44 PM
Original message
whats the big deal about F911 censorship?
what could they possibly be afraid of, truth?

they say we would do the same thing, but agnostics and athiests didnt get all up in arms when 'passion' came out... seriously, when has the left ever advocated censorship of ideas?

like hell we would do the same thing...

dubya called moore (actuial quote) "a slimeball", way to unite george... thats a great way to reach out to the left.

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mark0rama Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was Dubya' daddy who said slimeball, btw.
They smear because they fear.

The good news is there's no censorship here after all; the film is going to open on an unheard-of number of screens for a docu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. really? hmm on cnn was read as 'president bush'
maybe was read wrong off teleprompter...

who knows

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark0rama Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe Junior said it too.
Y'know, like father like son. (One term and he's done.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The funniest part is the Goebbels/Reiffenstahl comparisons...
Completely ignoring the fact that what those two did and their life's work was done to further the image of and prop up the purpose of people in power.

Last I checked Moore (liberal) was actively doing work that CHALLENGED the people in power (conservatives).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I thought so. Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. What censorship?
The movie is a great success and is playing all over. Save us from your private delusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think he was talking about their attempted censorship.....
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 03:10 PM by vi5
...just poorly phrased. He meant why are they trying to censor it (which they are...just failing miserably).

No need to jump all over the guy. There was nothing delusional about his post.

On edit: as much as I hope it will be, you can't really call a movie that hasn't officially opened wide yet a "success". I'm sure it will be but it's a little premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Frankly, there is no censorship for "F911"...
Michael has garnered an unprecedented amount of media coverage for this film. I'm guessing it will swiftly become the most profitable documentary in cinema history. By a very large margin. That's not to say that foes of Moore aren't railing against it---indeed they are. But the dimensions of the conservative onslaught against Moore only prove how much they fear his ability to influence people.

This ain't another pamphlet from Chomsky. This is the most ultra-hyped documentary in history. Moore has played this situation like a goddamn Stradivarius. And more power to him.

My point is, let's talk about censorship when it's actually occuring. To invoke the charge when it's not warranted is to cheapen the charge when it IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. they sure as hell tried... and to some degree got it
groups are preassuring theaters to not show it, and in some cases getting it taken off of some screens or taken out of some theaters all together. in most cases in the more conservative areas, where people need to see it the most.

the R raiting i think isnt viable... probably for language, im guessing, but how likley is there to be any nudity in this movie? not very... so i dont think this movie is fitting of an R raiting, depending on the extent of the language, and there might possibly be some 'disturbing footage' from iraq or whatnot, but nothing worse than is on the 6:00 news most likley.

-LK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Westegg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I understand your point....
...But I also happen to be keyed into a lot of liberal Hollywood folks, and I haven't heard from them that Mike's film is being "banned. " Yes, there's pressure against it. But it's getting a wide release. Like I said, it's going to make more money than any previous doc.

Okay, the R-rating is bullshit. I'll give you that . It's beyond bullshit---it's flat-out absurd. But I happen to know a great deal about the MPAA, and I can say that, as fucked-up and hypocriical as this organization is, they aren't Bush toadies. The insanity of the ratings board goes so much deeper than the Bush Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC