Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld co-owns NM ranch with......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:16 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld co-owns NM ranch with......
Dan Rather.

Small World "You would think, especially after the capture of Saddam, that Rumsfeld could pack it in, go out on top and settle down in that ranch in Taos, N.M., that he co-owns with, among others, Dan Rather."
-- From a Time magazine year-end portrait of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld by Michael Duffy and Mark Thompson.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/dailymojo/2004/01/01_501.html

(Times is linked at the mj site but requires subscription)

I've seen the picture of Rummy with Saddam in the day, but I can't remember any more shots with US citizens until the Rather interview just before the invasion. Isn't that odd?......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. And?
this has any bearing on anything, how? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh nothing at all. Raising such linkages is a waste of our precious time.
From Dan Rather's interview with Donald Rumsfeld, "Camp Victory", Iraq, September 5, 2003.

RATHER: First of all, thank you. Mr. Secretary, I do not know of any American who doesn't admire what you did in helping secure the battlefield victory that resulted in the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. I don't know of anybody who doesn't appreciate your service.

RUMSFELD: Thank you.

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030905-secdef0649.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What link?
The link between Rumsfeld and the NM ranch?

Or, the link between Rumsfeld and Rather?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Rumsfeld and Rather, of course.
The intimacy between America's "watchdogs" and its rulers always bear examination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not sure I'd call today's media "watchdogs"
more like "lapdogs"

ANd that goes for the media in pretty much every corner of the globe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Rather is the best one of the 'big three'
got considerable heat for the Saddam interview, and is the only one to go public with Pentagon pressure to make the war look good (albeit in London).

Oh yeah, Christine Amanpour--three months after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Because Rather is the best (of the 3) - we are TOTALLY fucked!!!
Most 'Muricans admire Herr Scumsfeld?? :wtf:
Not the ones I know!!
:puke:
:puke:
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Dan Rather didn't talk to me
I don't admire anything that liar ever did.

Rummy is one of the worst liares in the administration, including lying to Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wish I knew!
How tight would you have to be with someone to share property with them?

I think it raises a multiplicity of ethics questions- For instance, how does Rather, a powerful media personality, balance his personal relationship with government officials, and his responsibilities as a journalist?

I thought that might be obvious, but maybe I'm just the suspicious type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. ethics?
Should journalists be partners in business deals with the people they're supposed to be covering?

Of course he has every legal right to do it but can we trust his judgment/reporting if he's in bed financially with the very people who are centrally involved in the most important news of the day.

It seems clear to me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rather is a Propagandist
nothing more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. So what...Schiefer owned Tx Rangers with boosh....
and so did Schiefer's brother. Forgot Schiefer's first name. They are all super rich and hang out with the super rich. Newscasters cook up dirty politics so that they can make money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Since when...
...did Conflict of Interest become a "Family Value" and something to highlight on ones resume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC