http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.hts/front/2296031The county's $25 million eSlate system was first used in November 2001, and in nine subsequent city and county elections. It replaced an aging punch-card system similar to the one at the center of the 2000 presidential election controversy in Florida.
A recent review, however, of voting machines found that the eSlate system has numerous potential security weaknesses of its own, including lack of encryption to protect election data and passwords and the ability for a hacker to shut down polls early.
*snip*
David Beirne, a spokesman for Harris County Clerk Beverly Kaufman, said he remains confident in the security of the system and the vendor's ability to make the recommended changes.
"We don't see reason to take a second look or question the integrity of the system," Beirne said.
*snip*
Michael Shamos, a computer science professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, said the absence of encryption may be a security flaw, but it's not one that could be easily exploited.
"I'm not against the recommendation," said Shamos, who consulted with the Texas attorney general's office about electronic voting. "I just don't see it represents any serious threat."
*snip*
Need I comment that Shamos, et al, are idiots?
David Allen
Publisher, CEO, Janitor
Plan Nine Publishing
http://www.plan9.org