Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOSE is the opposite of WIN, LOOSE is the opposite of TIGHT,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:51 AM
Original message
LOSE is the opposite of WIN, LOOSE is the opposite of TIGHT,
I am not trying to be the typo police, but in thread after thread I read about someone "loosing". The freeper morans that visit might not notice, but let's try and do better!

End of constructive criticism for my fellow loving DU'ers

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
Typos (or misspelled words) get in the way of understanding and appreciating the stories being conveyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. or
Lose is the opposite of Find,
and Loose is the opposite of Moral.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I think people get thrown off by choose and chose
Loose rhymes with goose.

Lose rhymes with choose.

Chose rhymes with those.

I don't like seeing errors either -- but I know the difference, and I still have to stop and count on my fingers to make sure I've got it right.

There's a similar problem with lead and led.

"Lead" the metal sounds the same as "led" the past tense of the verb "lead."

But "lead," the present tense, rhymes with "bleed."

As a result, people get confused and often spell the past tense as "lead" instead of "led."


I suspect it's a lost cause.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. More than likely, it was the freep troll
what can I say??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU
I'm generally not a grammar weenie but misspelling "lose" is my greatest net pet peeve these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's a common one
Here is another. "Noone" is used in place of "no one" or "none". Please notice, "noone" is not a word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Peter Noone, of Herman's Hermits,
thinks it is. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, losen up!
:bounce: :hi: :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Droopy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a couple that always get me
Speak and speech. I always get them messed up like this: speek and speach. I had to look them up in the dictionary the other day. Now I've got it right. Shame on me, I won't let it happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kutastha Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Another
This one just gets to me every time I see it: "Definately". Where does that come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks!
Also, it's masturbate, not masterbate.

And apostrophes are used to indicate possession. They don't make things plural. So you wouldn't say "What do the soldier's think about Bushs lie's?"

Yes, I'm sounding very pedantic here, but it is expected of me as an English teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Except Except Except Except Except
When dealing with "it," in which case the apostrophe indicates a contraction of "it is" (i.e. "it's"), while the possessive uses NO apostrophe: its.

And we have to ACCEPT the EXCEPTIONS...;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Your right.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. True--that's an important exception.
And one that makes no sense, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GayboyBilly Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just my 2 cents...
I would worry more about the degradation of our Country, than someone's grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you. Drives me nuts too. And "whacko" is another one.
Unless you are slamming somebody against the head the spelling is "wacko." As in they are wacky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. When my pants get too loose, I tend to lose them.
Edited on Sun Jul-27-03 12:12 PM by Anj
Luckily, I always find them around my ankles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good one
Edited on Sun Jul-27-03 12:10 PM by quinnox
This should be quoted in all threads where loose is used incorrectly.

A side comment-(It drives me up the wall too, this kind of thing, especially "noone"! This non-word is so pervasive on the internet, it is ridiculous.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. I also thank you
I also thank you. I started seeing this online, now I've even read it in the papers. ARRRGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yer write!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, these mistakes are NOT hard to learn to correct, and it's
a sign of ignorance for people to continue to make these mistakes even after the errors have been pointed out constantly on this board. I have hesitated to insert grammar and spelling corrections/suggestions into posts talking about other things, but it is so disheartening to read posts that are borderline illiterate on a Democratic site. We are supposed to be better than the freepers who never read anything but Coulter and comics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. bad grammer is four loosers!
Edited on Sun Jul-27-03 12:45 PM by KG
it don't take a genious to learn the difference between 'you're' and 'your'; or their, there and they're; or affect and effect; weather and wheather; roll and role; and a bunch of other mis-uses of the english language i often see in the 'net! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. And just what is a "genious"?
Edited on Sun Jul-27-03 01:34 PM by TahitiNut
Someone neither ingenious or 'outgenious'? Someone possessing the magical attributes of a genie? Part of a new taxonomy that's a subset of genus and a subgrouping of species? Or is it merely an ingenious genius, possessing both inventiveness and brilliance?

It's a living language, for sure. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Alot of people don't know better.
^^^ not a compound word.

I suddenly feel as if Miss Landers might magically appear and tell each of us "Well done, Beaver."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. kick
I'm LOSING it, not LOOSING IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoYaCallinAlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. I don't plan on loosing the '04 election.
Therefore, I won't be using that word again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. I get so "FLUSTRATED" with people who make the lose/loose error!
Anyone else hear the word "flustrated" creeping into the language? Where did that originate? Fluster + Frustrate? Flustrated? It really drives me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. And the WINNER IS:
:bounce: HYPOCRISY :bounce:

Please make a note of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Is it possible that the person can spell the word properly
but just doesn't take the time to check for errors? We all make mistakes and we are not writing scholarly papers here. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. You expect too much...


...from people who live in a nation with an illiterate president*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. He was illiterate? Really?
Who was his father, then? Does Babs know?

I guess she was a lose woman, at least once you got her tight with some martinis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Hippo-critical: making snide comments about 'river horses'
I've been second-guessing myself lately 'cos I spell that word hypocrisy and was wondering if I'd been wrong all this time, but I checked the following and it spake unto me that, nay, I was cool:

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=HYPOCRISY

Am I missing something here? I am wiped-out tired, so that wouldn't be the least likely occurrence.....

Not that its' anything to loose sleepover, I guest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-03 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Noone dose it alot, tho. (Why is this in GD, by the way?) N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC