|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:07 PM Original message |
Poll question: Are you ruling in/out candidates based on their IWR votes/positions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. I am looking at ALL the issues, and the totality of the candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Integrity, honesty, ideas, electability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's not my "sole" litmus test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Then it's your litmus test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
27. No, only one of several |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Are you willing to disqualify on the basis of IWR? Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 12:32 AM Response to Reply #33 |
47. it's a big litmus test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:14 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. My question was about the primary. It's your litmus test for the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 08:23 AM Response to Reply #48 |
79. lets put it this way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSoundAndVision (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. Dialect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. I cannot support anyone in the primary who voted for the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
29. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. Life and death, war and peace, are issues that trump all others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. There aren't any anti-patriot act serious candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. the guy who wrote Patriot Act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Deleted message |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. If Edwards is such a rookie, then he shouldn't be President either! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 12:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
46. hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. I cannot rule any of them out over spilled milk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Spilt Blood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. And its over and done with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. kerry, dean, clark and litmus tests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. I take the whole picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. The chips just happen to fall that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. It's one of several litmus tests for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. I am supporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Khephra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. If you can be fooled by Bush, almost two years into his term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. They blast the IWR without offering an alternative plan to disarm Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. People of that ilk ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. you're putting words in my mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. war must be a last resort ... IWR did not enforce that standard ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 12:11 AM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Actually its ignorant to think there were/are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. the credible plan was offered by those whining leftist types |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
57. Not exactly true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 08:41 AM Response to Reply #19 |
81. And why, pray tell, would you want to "disarm Iraq"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frank frankly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
20. we should not be in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. In the primary, definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
23. strumpeting hard for Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. nothin wrong with that, he's a great candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 09:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. why is he a great candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. he's a great candidate because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. perhaps you should review his positions, might be surprized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. he's got the whole package |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 11:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. that is just sweet talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 11:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. one salient point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 12:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I hope you are ready to excuse Bush too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
52. Time will tell that he grasped it better than anyone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:30 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. never mind this, he only sees what he wants to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:37 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. I take it as a sign of Edwards's strenght that sujan can't muster more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:04 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:31 AM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Yes. thoughtful. well-argued. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:32 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. good luck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:33 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. ta |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 11:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. "the whole package" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:24 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. great news for you then ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:20 AM Response to Reply #26 |
50. Because he represents individuals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:05 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. shows clearly in the polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:32 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. He'll win the polls that matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:36 AM Response to Reply #63 |
65. yes, he is clearly winning on the negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:52 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. not a full sentence (yet, consistently, short) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:11 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. he'd be lucky to win his own state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:14 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. He's definitely going to win NC primary. As for GE, NC has gone Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:18 AM Response to Reply #73 |
75. your 'fact' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:34 AM Response to Reply #75 |
76. ESL? I don't understand your senence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:08 AM Response to Reply #50 |
70. "Because he represents individuals." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:16 AM Response to Reply #23 |
49. "strumpeting" is a word? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sujan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:06 AM Response to Reply #49 |
60. as long as you get the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
34. I've ruled out anyone who voted for IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-23-03 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
41. the rubber meets the road... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sleipnir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
43. Yes,I will not vote for any candidate in the GeneralElection who voted YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:27 AM Response to Reply #43 |
54. The Republicans have played you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
51. I am not applying a litmus test concerning the IWR itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
66. not my 'sole' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:55 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Another person for whom it was litmus test, yet doesn't want to say so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnKleeb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 02:57 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. It was my litmus test but I still can like and respect those who voted for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:13 AM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Why can't people just say, "yes, it was a litmus test"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 03:16 AM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Becuase I have a theory about how the Republicans intentionally created... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 04:03 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Well, I must admit I didn't expect such a reasoned response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Piperay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
78. NO... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-24-03 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
80. yes....and i will NOT vote for anyone who supported IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC