Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stratfor.com tells lies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 01:11 PM
Original message
Stratfor.com tells lies

http://www.bigleftoutside.com /

20 Stratfor Lies About Latin America

-snip-

Stratfor is one of these snake-oil disinfo sales firms that traffics in "intelligence briefings" for people gullible enough to pay for them. Imagine that: you can get lied to for free all over this great land, but some people actually pay to be deceived!

From time to time, they send a free one out via email. Stratfor's track record in Latin America is abhorrent (how many years in a row did it predict that Hugo Chavez would not survive that year as Venezuela's president?). It's "spin" is ideological: pro-corporate, which is no surprise, given that it's undisclosed clientele purchases something called "Business Intelligence Services."

-snip-

I found - count 'em - 20 obvious, knowingly false, lies in that single document (well, one of those 20 lies might have just been a boneheaded error that proves they don't use decent fact-checkers, but the rest are knowing lies). Anyway, in a 2,888 word document, I found 20 gross, demonstrable, distortions of the truth. Here they are. It's a long document and a long, section-by-section, rebuttal from me, so I've tucked it below in the "Extended Entry" box. Just click it to read.

-snip-

The #2 Stratfor Lie: Of the "four Latin American presidents" that Stratfor claims were "toppled," here are the true facts. Peru's authoritarian Alberto Fujimori resigned. Argentina's Fernando de la Rua resigned. Bolivia's Gonzalo "Goni" Sanchez de Lozada resigned. In those three cases, none of them resigned under military force. Popular, unarmed, protests led, in each case, to a consensus that the leader had no support among his countrymen. That is not a "toppling." It is a peaceful, orderly, constitutional, change in power, like, say, the 1974 resignation of Richard M. Nixon in the United States. Very much like that, in fact. In the fourth case, Ecuador's Jamil Mahauad resigned in 2000 after a rebellion that included a dissident military faction and a popular unarmed uprising.
-snip-
--------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. The freaKers just love this source. The cite it all the time n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stratfor lies?! I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell ya!
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 01:16 PM by MSchreader
Seriously, folks on the far left have known Stratfor was a Drudgesque "information" outfit for some time.

Martin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I do believe you're right, Donsu.
I used to quote them all the time when I first jumped on the DU. I was truly impressed, and felt grateful about getting their tiny "freebies"; abbreviated articles about current political happenings. Like a sample cup of wine at a vineyard.

I had no reason to doubt them. They claim they are Ex-CIA agents with "insider" knowledge that journalists, government people and high-ranking officials can't get their hands on.

And a membership is spendy on that web site. I think the minimum is $99 per year. So it sounds good.

However, I started noticing some inconsistencies in their stories. They made the claim that the US was preparing to bomb Iran. Not 2 weeks later, they wrote that the US would be entering into an alliance with Iran to defeat the resistance fighters in Iraq.

Nor do I detect any criticism of what's going on. They correctly stated that the war in Iraq is about control of the Middle East, but they forgot about the oil.

Forget about Statfor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great Blog, Thanks. *Lots* of Goodies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 20th 2018, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC