Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak is missing for the 2'nd day in a row Chgo Sun Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:08 PM
Original message
Novak is missing for the 2'nd day in a row Chgo Sun Times
Novak's column is missing again today from the Chicago Sun Times. Another writer has replaced him and it's not Bill O'Really.

What's up? Anyone know what has happened to the jerk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnGideon Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. He Still Shows His Mug On Crossfire n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll bet he's drunk somewhere...
He's always tipsy-acting on Crossfire. A big bender for his big goof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Some people drink when they lose their job
I hope he lost his job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I sure hope they boot him off
crossfire. I have been reduced to watching crossfire only when Carville is on because Bergala(sp)tries but he is not forceful enough for me. Why don't some coward journalists muster up the courage and step up to the plate and tell him to make himself invisible.I know a lot of them don't like him nor what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldian159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. novak is a tool
You guys know that novak has revealed a source some time ago...

http://www.politicalstrategy.org/2003_10_10_weblog_archive.php#106579494708116713

To all Carville (sp) fans, watch War Room. Good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
childslibrarian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. when is it on?
war room
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd be laying low for awhile too if I blew the cover of a Spy
It is a moot point who in Bush*s Administration set out to kill Plame by outing her.
The TRUTH is the person who broke the law and put that name inprint is Novak.

Why isn't he is jail or before Ashcroft's interrogators in Gitmo?
This is a greater treason than me protesting the iraqi invasion and there is a deafening silence over this criminal act!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'd also look over my shoulder and check my car every day. . .
Hope the asshole is sleeping with one eye open at night.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No other reporter would pick the story up except Novakula
Faux Views didn't even run with the story and they are the biggest Whores around.
It's time for Novak to get the boot and he needs to go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Did anyone notice his teeth this past weekend? They looked like buck teeth
he never had that look before...he could barely cover his teeth with his lips..It was too soon for halloween.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah noticed that last week.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I noticed his teeth, too
I though it was me – that I had never noticed his teeth before. They made his whole face look different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. No, you're wrong
The person who broke the law is the one who leaked her name. And what the hell is treasonous about protesting the iraqi invasion? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wilson … said … would be a violation … by the officials, not the columnist
CIA seeks probe of White House

WASHINGTON, Sept. 26 — The CIA has asked the Justice Department to investigate allegations that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the identity of one of its undercover employees in retaliation against the woman’s husband, a former ambassador who publicly criticized President Bush’s since-discredited claim that Iraq had sought weapons-grade uranium from Africa, NBC News has learned.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/937524.asp?0cv=CB10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=135657

Leak of Agent's Name Causes Exposure of CIA Front Firm

The leak of a CIA operative's name has also exposed the identity of a CIA front company, potentially expanding the damage caused by the original disclosure, Bush administration officials said yesterday.

The company's identity, Brewster-Jennings & Associates, became public because it appeared in Federal Election Commission records on a form filled out in 1999 by Valerie Plame, the case officer at the center of the controversy, when she contributed $1,000 to Al Gore's presidential primary campaign.

After the name of the company was broadcast yesterday, administration officials confirmed that it was a CIA front. They said the obscure and possibly defunct firm was listed as Plame's employer on her W-2 tax forms in 1999 when she was working undercover for the CIA. Plame's name was first published July 14 in a newspaper column by Robert D. Novak that quoted two senior administration officials. They were critical of her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, for his handling of a CIA mission that undercut President Bush's claim that Iraq had sought uranium from the African nation of Niger for possible use in developing nuclear weapons.

The Justice Department began a formal criminal investigation of the leak Sept. 26.

The inadvertent disclosure of the name of a business affiliated with the CIA underscores the potential damage to the agency and its operatives caused by the leak of Plame's identity. Intelligence officials have said that once Plame's job as an undercover operative was revealed, other agency secrets could be unraveled and her sources might be compromised or endangered.

A former diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity said yesterday that every foreign intelligence service would run Plame's name through its databases within hours of its publication to determine if she had visited their country and to reconstruct her activities.

"That's why the agency is so sensitive about just publishing her name," the former diplomat said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40012-2003Oct3.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=147987

Democrats seek assessment of damage caused by outing of US intelligence agent

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Leading Democrats sent a letter to the US agency tasked with safeguarding America's intelligence capability, seeking an immediate assessment of the damage caused by the outing of a CIA agent's identity.

Top Democrats in the US Senate, including Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, asked the National Counterintelligence Executive headed by Michelle Van Cleave to undertake an immediate review of whether US intelligence has been compromised by the leak.

"The exposure of one of America's undercover intelligence officers by an official of the US government constitutes the most egregious form of betrayal," read the letter by Daschle, and fellow Senate Democrats Carl Levin, Joseph Biden, and John Rockefeller.

"Since this case involves the publication of classified information and the extent of the material disclosed is known, we believe that a damage assessment can and should be undertaken immediately," the lawmakers wrote.

"Swift action is needed to protect the individuals whose lives may be at risk," they said, requesting a copy of the findings within 30 days.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20031015/pl_afp/us_cia_iraq_politics&cid=1521&ncid=1480
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=539395

Rice 'Knew Nothing' About CIA Agent Leak

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said on Sunday she knew "nothing of any" White House effort to leak the identity of an undercover CIA officer in July, a charge now under review at the Justice Department.

On the "Fox News Sunday" program, the top aide to President Bush said, "This has been referred to the Justice Department. I think that is the appropriate place for it."

Rice said the White House would cooperate should the Justice Department, headed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, decide to proceed with a criminal investigation of the matter, which centers on the alleged public disclosure of the wife of former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

Wilson was sent by the CIA to Niger in 2002 to investigate a report that Iraq was trying to obtain uranium from Niger, but returned to say it was highly doubtful.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030928/ts_nm/iraq_intelligence_probe_dc&cid=564&ncid=1480
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=136932

A White House smear

Did senior Bush officials blow the cover of a US intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security—and break the law—in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?

It sure looks that way, if conservative journalist Bob Novak can be trusted.

The sources for Novak’s assertion about Wilson’s wife appear to be “two senior administration officials.” If so, a pair of top Bush officials told a reporter the name of a CIA operative who apparently has worked under what’s known as “nonofficial cover” and who has had the dicey and difficult mission of tracking parties trying to buy or sell weapons of mass destruction or WMD material. If Wilson’s wife is such a person—and the CIA is unlikely to have many employees like her—her career has been destroyed by the Bush administration. (Assuming she did not tell friends and family about her real job, these Bush officials have also damaged her personal life.) Without acknowledging whether she is a deep-cover CIA employee, Wilson says, “Naming her this way would have compromised every operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated in her entire career. This is the stuff of Kim Philby and Aldrich Ames.” If she is not a CIA employee and Novak is reporting accurately, then the White House has wrongly branded a woman known to friends as an energy analyst for a private firm as a CIA officer. That would not likely do her much good.

This is not only a possible breach of national security; it is a potential violation of law. Under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, it is a crime for anyone who has access to classified information to disclose intentionally information identifying a covert agent. The punishment for such an offense is a fine of up to $50,000 and/or up to ten years in prison. Journalists are protected from prosecution, unless they engage in a “pattern of activities” to name agents in order to impair US intelligence activities. So Novak need not worry.

Novak tells me that he was indeed tipped off by government officials about Wilson’s wife and had no reluctance about naming her. “I figured if they gave it to me,” he says. “They’d give it to others....I’m a reporter. Somebody gives me information and it’s accurate. I generally use it.” And Wilson says Novak told him that his sources were administration officials.

http://thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=823
http://www.arbiteronline.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/07/23/3f1f5fa79c206
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=18072&mesg_id=18072&page=
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=108&topic_id=5913&mesg_id=5913&page=


Novak, in an interview, said his sources had come to him with the information. “I didn't dig it out, it was given to me,” he said. “They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it.”

Wilson and others said such a disclosure would be a violation of the law by the officials, not the columnist.

Novak reported that his “two senior administration officials” told him that it was Plame who suggested sending her husband, Wilson, to Niger.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscia0722,0,2346857.story?coll=ny-top-headlines
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=103&topic_id=2326&mesg_id=2326&page=

A War on Wilson?
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,465270,00.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=18113&mesg_id=18113&page=

White House striking back?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/942095.asp?0cv=CA01

Schumer Urges FBI Probe Into Iraq Leaks
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030724/ap_on_go_ot/schumer_agent_1

Probes Expected in ID of CIA Officer
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscia233384176jul23,0,5461415.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-print

The Bush Administration Adopts a Worse-than-Nixonian Tactic: The Deadly Serious Crime Of Naming CIA Operatives by John W. Dean
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030815.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. What if he outed a hundred undercover CIA agents?
Two hundred? Is he eternally exempt? What if he were a columnist for The Daily Worker?

There are apparently some legal issues at conflict here that might well need to be ajudicated (IANAL).

.02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. he knowingly outed a CIA officer
how long can he hide behind the first on this one. Someone told him Plame was a CIA officer and wrote it in the paper. Now if someone told me that Mr or Mrs. X was a CIA officer and I wrote a letter in the paper saying Mr. X is a CIA officer, I'd be in jail. However, if I became a part time reporter at the Cow Dung Daily Bulletin then I could write a story about Mr. X being a CIA officer and not go to jail. Hmmmm, that's ironic. OK, el shitheado, Novak you have the right not to reveal your sources but that doesn't mean you can knowingly write that Mr. X is a CIA officer. Does it? Nope. Novak your going to jail because your get out of jail free card has been revoked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The Sun Times must be getting a large amount of complaints
I can bet the farm that the Bush Crime family paid Novak big bucks to run with the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. He's spending more time with his dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkahead Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think he was told he
no longer gets to do print. Screwed his boss, BIG TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. His column runs Sunday, Monday and Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corarose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. His column use to run everyday
They have cut him down to three days now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I guess so.
They've got all his October columns archived through the link I provided. His column ran every Sunday, Monday and Thursday in October. It also ran on October 1st, which was a Wednesday. Maybe 10-1 was the last time they ran his column daily. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Maybe he's in jail where any good traitor belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evanstondem Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe an exposed CIA operative has eliminated him
We can hope, can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC