Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic candidates on medical marijuana

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:21 AM
Original message
Democratic candidates on medical marijuana
I thought this might be interesting for some to compare. I've not seen all of the candidates' views on this, so for those interested, here it is:

The candidates' positions on medical marijuana, according to their campaigns.

JOHN EDWARDS: Science is still unclear. There needs to be a high-level Food and Drug Administration commission to determine right away whether medical marijuana is the best way to treat pain.

JOHN KERRY: Supports the use of real science to determine the effectiveness, safety and need for the controlled medical use of marijuana. If scientifically warranted, and studied by an objective commission, the use must be closely restricted to prevent abuse and illegal trafficking.

HOWARD DEAN: As a doctor, he believes marijuana should be treated no differently from any other drug. It should be evaluated by the FDA for its safety and then approved if it is safe and effective, rejected if it is not.

DENNIS KUCINICH: Disagrees with President Bush's methods of "harassing medical marijuana patients" and instead favors medical marijuana being used to relieve the suffering of seriously ill patients.

JOE LIEBERMAN: Is aware of reports that marijuana may provide therapeutic relief for some individuals, but isn't aware of any reputable studies to support this. He opposes legalizing a drug that many health professionals believe has greater health risks than therapeutic benefits.

CAROL MOSELEY BRAUN: Is in favor of medicinal marijuana use.

Campaigns for Dick Gephardt, Wesley Clark and Al Sharpton did not respond timely to requests for information about their position on this issue.


http://desmoinesregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/22620209.html

:smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke::smoke:
:dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hooah!
Looky here! Politicians giving politician answers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. true enough
but it seems like only Dennis K and CMB favor it without more "studies"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. YEah
But we have regulation for a reason, as screwed up as it can be.

The only reason Pot is questionable as medication is that concentrations of active ingredients can not be discerned in mass quantities. Hard to regulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl21014 Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Forget Medical - I want it legalized period!
Sell it in the liquor store!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onebigbadwulf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow...
Joe sounds more like a republican every day... tough question? Plead ignorance! If ol joe had half a brain he would realize that several scientific studies have been done to suggest Mary Jane is very therapuetic- especially in cases of glaucoma and appetite stimulation where marinol (a synthetic THC drug) is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. I disagree with all the candidates
Make it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Chalk up another one of us for legalization...
Probably still too big a risk on the main stage. A 2nd term president would have to push it-- or a candidate that doesn't give a fsck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. would you want
Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds making it instead? My worry about making it outright legal is that big tobacco companies would dominate the industry because of their resources and built in advantages (i've seen a malboro design for a pack of joints) and I just don't quite trust those folks...

:dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. With tobacco you have over 50 different companies that make it
I'd imagine the same for Marijuana, maybe PM and RJ Reynolds will jump to the idea but under legalization their would be other companies producing it. I really don't care about all that other stuff, I just don't want to have to pay over 100 dollars in court fees, fines, and probation over a resonated pipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
concord Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Are all of them on it?
Or just a select few ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. just didn't respond that's all
Dick Gephardt, Wesley Clark and Al Sharpton did not respond timely to requests for information about their position on this issue.

I'm sure they all have some views on it. Well maybe not Clark, yet, like with many things.

:dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kerry - moratorium on arrests
He said that during a town hall meeting. He said he just thinks there has to be a legitimate, non-political process to put an end to the controversy once and for all.

I'm in Oregon and my family doctor will not prescribe pot to be smoked. He prescribes it to be baked in brownies because he says his patients say it works better and he doesn't want smoking to create more health problems in the long run. So even if medical marijuana were legalized, there's no guarantee it would be legal to smoke it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC