Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

predicted post-scandal realignments - #1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:27 AM
Original message
predicted post-scandal realignments - #1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5673334

Squeaking sounds can be heard as the realignments, tossing of hot potatoes, denial of having ever been anywhere near the place that (I predicted would) follow the break of the NSA case and the failure of the PATSY Act to win universal acclaim would appear to be starting. The first one I've found is the above, where neocon luminaries are signing on to advocacy groupings funded by billionaires which seek to address energy dependency and global warming. One might give them the benefit of the doubt and conclude that as smart people and shrewd politicians, they have concluded that moving the American giant into the Mideast to secure oil supplies and profits was not such a long-term strategy, because the damn oil wasn't there. Or you could be cynical and conclude that as smart people and shrewd politicians, they're thinking that their press isn't so good and that they've identified the new "right" side of various issues to be on and are rushing there to secure their backs, and to be prepared to manipulate the new-energy movement as it inevitably arises.

A third alternative is that they intended to get America mired in the mideast, seeing it as a win-win solution from the standpoint of blunting Islamic cultural vandals, improving Israeli security prospects and reshaping the power balances in the mideast, and are now moving on to step 2 in their activities. As one of their chippies (Ann Korin) put it she “couldn’t care less” about global warming or protecting the environment from oil drilling. “I’m involved in this because most of the world’s oil reserves are owned by countries that finance people that want to kill us, that finance radical Islam."

Whatever the motivations, it is worth noting the agility of these people. Apparently behind the above activities toward new energy are creatures like Frank Gaffney and Daniel Pipes, i.e. old-line PNAC neocon apparatchiks. Apparently, after finding a good application for American tax dollars and lives, they are now ready to plan our future in other venues as well.

By the way, I note that they are smart. Of course, it should be stated just to be sure that it's clear that that in no way equates to "ethical", or in fact that they have well-developed and mature ethics (even were they to produce the very different results these folks get for geopolitical questions compared to normal people). In fact, their behavior indicates to me that they operate on the basis of believing that they are superior in capability and preparation for guiding public affairs to all other players on the scene (which would be in line with Strauss' affinity for ruling elites), and can with an only mildly contemptuous smile guide their inferiors towards ends which they (the neocons) have identified. This would however appear to be one of their fundamental flaws - the need to retain fairly high in their consciousness the notion that they are superior, and that they differentiate themselves from and elevate themselves above the allegedly cruder players on the world scene means that the content of their formulations is not enough to convince them that they will succeed. In some sense they seem to fit the profile of the typical (for the US) gifted child of an educated household, with superior training in certain types of intellectual activity, but an insufficient integration with their sense inputs so that they can really match their cognitive activity to conditions actually at hand and respond to them pertinently. Instead, they refer to their intellectual conditioning (in their case their ideology) and use it to answer the question, what do we do in this situation. This produces the defective results we see in Iraq and in the global free market economy they promote, i.e. in the externals of their programs, and it also implies that there are limitations to their smartness which inherently reduce the quality of their output, and also offer venues for attack and neutralization. Let's use those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I saw Woolsey...
...spewing the new party line over a year ago. I used to suggest such an angle of attack when we were all bemoaning the CAFE standard snubs by greasy oil executives. The Bushies offered a hearty "fuck you" to any legislation that would "hamstring" our auto giants. (Stop laughing.) That was around the time that Cheney was sneering about conservation being a "personal virtue". (I know, the words "Cheney" and "virtue" in the same sentence. Send me the Pulitzer. Stop laughing!)

I reasoned if everyone was in a froth about them filthy oil stained Muslims coming to molest our women, children, and Hummers, we should use their mindless propaganda-powered wrath, kind of like a Prius using stored braking energy. I could see the glossy print ads. You know, with Paul Hawken and Frank Gaffney planting a great big American flag atop a nuclear plant cooling tower. It could be the environmental movement's Iwo Jima. Victory over infidel oil! God Bless Arco!

There is no doubt that virus multiply. They are entering the new host, replicating with astonishing fury.

(Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC