Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cunningham Plea Sparks Pension Questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 10:34 PM
Original message
Cunningham Plea Sparks Pension Questions
Edited on Wed Dec-14-05 11:01 PM by cat_girl25


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051214/ap_on_go_co/congressman_bribery

WASHINGTON - Republican House members disturbed that their former GOP colleague Randy "Duke" Cunningham will get to keep his pension despite pleading guilty to bribery want to pass a law to strip federal pensions from white-collar criminals.

Under federal law, only a conviction for a crime against the United States, such as treason or espionage, can cause a member of Congress or other federal employee to lose his or her government pension.

That means Cunningham, a California Republican, will keep his pension despite admitting taking $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors and others in exchange for government contracts.

Cunningham's congressional pension would be around $40,000 per year, according to an Office of Personnel Management formula. He resigned last month and faces 10 years in prison when he's sentenced in February.

---------------

How much you wanna bet every last one of these criminals
voted to impeach President Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep your eye on this one, it could rise to the level of treason
They've subpoenaed Wilkes and his records in the Delay mess, which is connected to the Cunningham mess, which is connected to... blah blah blah.

Wilkes is the defense contractor who had a bunch of little companies whose only purpose seems to have been to collect fat DOD contracts funded by the taxpayers and flip the money into RNC coffers.

Personally, I think the whole RNC leadership needs to be brought up with Abramoff on racketeering charges. If this isn't the worst example of organized crime we've ever seen, what is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Treason eh?
We shall see. What about all that stolen money during the savings and loan debacle several years ago? That was wrong on all levels but I don't think anyone went to prison over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sojourner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. wasn't that on GHWB's watch...and weren't his boys in pretty deep on that?
i think that would explain why nobody went to prison. and probably a good reason to suspect it won't happen to the most deserving of this crowd this time either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It was only stolen from investors
and then the taxpayers. This was stolen from the Pentagon. Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They're always connected
So it will be interesting who pops up in the Abramoff case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC