Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vt. Teacher Accused of Anti - Bush Quiz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:24 PM
Original message
Vt. Teacher Accused of Anti - Bush Quiz
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 01:26 PM by cal04
A high school teacher is facing questions from administrators after giving a vocabulary quiz that included digs at President Bush and the extreme right. Bret Chenkin, a social studies and English teacher at Mount Anthony Union High School, said he gave the quiz to his students several months ago. The quiz asked students to pick the proper words to complete sentences.

One example: ''I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes.'' ''Coherent'' is the right answer. Principal Sue Maguire said she hoped to speak to whomever complained about the quiz and any students who might be concerned. She said she also would talk with Chenkin. School Superintendent Wesley Knapp said he was taking the situation seriously.

''It's absolutely unacceptable,'' Knapp said. ''They (teachers) don't have a license to hold forth on a particular standpoint.'' Chenkin, 36, a teacher for seven years, said he isn't shy about sharing his liberal views with students as a way of prompting debate, but said the quizzes are being taken out of context.

''The kids know it's hyperbolic, so-to-speak,'' he said. ''They know it's tongue in cheek.'' But he said he would change his teaching methods if some are concerned. ''I'll put in both sides,'' he said. ''Especially if it's going to cause a lot of grief.'' The school is in Bennington, a community of about 16,500 in the southwest corner of the state.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Liberal-Quiz.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051125/ap_on_re_us/liberal_quiz_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:26 PM
Original message
Gotta love Bennington - I have some pottery from there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Teachers all across this nation have been glorified and rewarded for
supporting this goose stepping little facist bastard since 2000. Now the shoe is on the other foot.

Also, these people are probably pissed because they didn't understand these words. They're bush** supporters. They think misunderstand is good Englist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Still it is pretty funny.
---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. To tell you the truth...
...I don't think he should have done it.

I certainly wouldn't want a teacher with rightward leanings sneaking in digs while I'm trying to learn in his vocabulary class, so I don't see why leftward ones are necessary, either. If he wants to talk politics with students after class, fine, but otherwise this seems out of place and unnecessarily disruptive to the learning environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. agree
We would have been screaming bloody murder if some right-leaning teacher included some digs at Clinton in his coursework. Politics should stay out of the classroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bammertheblue Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. yeah...
as funny as it is, I don't think it's really appropriate in the form it took here. Talking about politics in civics or government class is great (it's the point of the class, after all). But talking about politics or taking "digs" at specific politicians in a grammar lesson is just asking for trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes. It was Inarfully done.
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I ony have one problem with this...
''I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes.''

That should be ensuring, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Both are correct. Insure is a variant of ensure.
Though I'm with you, I've always preferred ensure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Charms the below average mind"
The key to bush being an idiot. Give that teacher a raise. To be fair and balanced he could add a sentence:

Bill Clinton's intellect is (far superior, much more superior) to that of the current president.

Intellectual curiosity (escapes, eludes) the current president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. When I was in grade school, and teachers gave such quizzes ...
... they 'lifted' the sentences from newspapers and magazines. I hope Chenkin did the same - and can shove the newpaper/magazine down the school administration's throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another problem
Edited on Fri Nov-25-05 01:50 PM by mahatmakanejeeves
"Principal Sue Maguire said she hoped to speak to whomever complained about the quiz and any students who might be concerned."

It should be "whoever," not "whomever." "Whoever" is the subject of the noun clause "{whoever} complained about the quiz." The noun clause is the object of the preposition "to."

Reference, chosen at random from a whole bunch of similar books: Holt Handbook, third edition, 1992.

The teacher's quiz was inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. As much as WE might like it, it was inappropriate and wrong to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Absolutely.
If we're against political/religious indoctrination in schools we have to be consistent.

This was a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. True or False? George Bush can't even open a fucking door.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC