Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America is not a Democracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:11 AM
Original message
America is not a Democracy
Democracy - (Greek) Demos - People, Kratein - Rule. It means "Rule by the People".

When people don't vote, don't conduct any research into candidates, or are told to vote by people (Such as the 'christian' Right), let's just say it can get kind of nasty.

Rule by the People does not mean that people can sit around and do nothing, save for Election Day (And that isn't even everybody).

OK! America isn't a Democracy.

Here are some alternatives, you may not like them, but America is becoming one these whether you like it or not.

Plutocracy - Rule by the Rich
Kakistocracy - Rule by the Incompetent
Hierocracy - Subdivision of Theocracy, rule by religious people and groups
Pornocracy - Rule by the Prostitutes. In a more metaphorical sense, it means rule by Lobbyists and "Pay to Play" Politicians

What will America become?

Is it too late to allow America to become a Democracy again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not until the other side
stops saying its a republic and not a democracy. In fact america is both, a fact that some seem to over look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually America IS a republic.
The founding fathers specifically avoided putting too much power in the direct hands of the people, fearing the tyranny of majority rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What the founding fathers intent was
was to create a system that gave neither the rulers or the ruled absolute control over each other. Thats why theres checks and balances in place, we the people have our responsibilities and the elected officials have theirs. They took what they considered the best of both and put it in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. An Oligarchical Republic at that.
Rule by the monied elite. Their own top tier private schools, why even the Presidential candidates last time belonged to the same small fraternity. Political dynasties, Bush, Kennedy, on & on. It is time to replace our failed system with a representative form of government, which allows us to escape the illusion of this "two party" system, which is a bad joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Granted, I don't know that the two party system is what they envisioned.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. The fact that they immediately split into two parties...
would make you think that it might have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I wouldn't say immediately.
It came naturally as people took opposite views of federal power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. So Bill Clinton was part of the "monied elite?"
What about Jimmy Carter?

What about Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. You're right!
"Nixon later hired Coopers & Lybrand to audit his finances. The firm concluded that a capital gain of $117,370 should have been reported on Nixon's 1970 return. Coopers & Lybrand's audit also revealed that Nixon's net worth was $988,522.

Clinton's returns reveal they were only pulled down $560000 in 1999.

Couldn't find Carter, but I'm sure that acreage in Plains is worthless, I'm confident you agree.

You can't sit there and tell me these people are in the same economic tier as 90+% of this Country.

http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/thpwebsite.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Please.
Nixon, Clinton, and Carter - none of them started out rich. There's absolutely a difference between them and blue-blood old-money families like the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I already said you're right
Shall I grovel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Absolutely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. you got it right ck
"Plutocracy - Rule by the Rich
Kakistocracy - Rule by the Incompetent
Hierocracy - Subdivision of Theocracy, rule by religious people and groups
Pornocracy - Rule by the Prostitutes. In a more metaphorical sense, it means rule by Lobbyists and "Pay to Play" Politicians"

ALL OF THE ABOVE - which lead to much harsher systems such as fascism, totalitarianism and dictatorships
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. A Representative Republic
Supported by a Constitution, not a Constitutional Republic as some ignorant folks might tell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. In theory, yes...
How long has it been since our representatives actually represented the people and not special interests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:26 AM
Original message
The people are not the government anymore than the Easter
Bunny. . . By the people, for the people, of the people are no better than colored eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. American "democracy" is a pleasant myth. It's an oligarchy.
The Golden Rule. "Those who have the gold, rule."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Corporacracy - rule by corporations
Would corporacracy be the right word?
Because the corporations own our asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Better than Authoritarian Communism
Where the State owns everything and the State is the ruler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's all pretty much the same when you get Authoritarian
Whether it's Authoritarian Communism, Authoritarian Theocracy, Authoritarian Plutocracy, etc., it should be something that all sane people (regardless of political ideology) should oppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. America under Bush is a kleptocracy
Steal from the poor & give to the über-wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sheesh....it never has been a "Democracy". Its always been a....
Representative Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The point is that whatever form it is, it is broken
Why quibble over the fine points, whatever it is-it doesn't work for the majority of the people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. It isn't a small point at all.
In fact the distinction speaks directly to the issue brought up by the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I would say both a republic and a democracy.
Our form of democracy is not direct democracy, however, but indirect through elected representatives.

And this country's leadership, both Democratic and Republican, talks frequently about our "democratic ideals," not to mention the need to bring "democracy" to other countries.

A republic is not always democratic, but it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. That depends on her people
are they willing to stand for a Democracy based on the constitution? Only by the people can it work and the people may have to work for it again as they did over 200 years ago....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC