Is Woodward part of a cover-up bigger then Watergate?

[PhilipShore]

Poll question: Is Woodward part of a cover-up bigger then Watergate?

[ClintonTyree]

1. We'll have to sse what happens because of this.....

honestly I can't see this effecting Irving's case any if at all. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. What Wormwood said to Fitzgerald is what's going to be interesting and we won't know that for quite some time I imagine. It doesn't seem to be swaying the court of public opinion any. It might be Wormwood's way of keeping himself connected to the story, to maintain his precious access to the BFEE that he so dearly loves.
In short, the jury is still out on this one, there's no way of telling yet.

[Birthmark]

2. My spidey sense is tingling.

I suspect that this is simply diversion for the White House. If everybody told, then nobody told is probably the idea here. Woodward is merely playing the sycophant...well, not so much playing.

[drhilarius]

3. If that is the case, then not only is it a huge story...

but also one of the largest slices of Irony pie ever served in the history of humanity.

[Tiggeroshii]

4. Well then you gotta admit... Saddam Hussein complaining about privacy is

sorta ironic as well, complaing about a fair trial. This poetic justice is still seeming to make it's trip around to the highest levels of justice and power in the world. It's quite entertaining!

I just kinda wish this happened similarly aroudn Reagan's time as well. They pretty much got away with it all...

[Disturbed]

6. Doesn't Woody have to tell who told him?

I suspect someone talked to Fitz. and that forced Woody to reveal this.

[liberal N proud]

5. I have been al over the place on this one

It sounds too weird.
At first I thought, so what if Woody knew, that doesn't change the Libby thing, I could mean there were several people telling several reporters so as to make sure it got out.
Then I wondered, is Woodward repaying the repukes for Watergate?
This thing just keeps getting more bazaar with every new detail.