Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The repukes will nominate Condi in '08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:36 PM
Original message
The repukes will nominate Condi in '08
if things continue to spiral out of control by then.

My thinking is that the DEMS can nominate me for prez if things continue to free fall for the pukes. I feel most people would vote for whatever DEM candidate we put out b/c they wouldn't want to send another puke to the White House.

The the pukes can spin it like this:
"Look we nominated a woman and a "minority". We tried to extend our hand out to women and "minorities" but those bad DEMS didn't want to support a candidate like that."

Just my thoughts.
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, she is awful and will lose big-time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bingo. It's amusing how they've succeeded in turning the tables.
Still, in every candy store there's always a shelf full of oreos...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. It would be just like them to try that...
but she may be discredited by then along with the rest of the cabal. And their very own racist, misogynist souls will probably keep them from doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. The other pukes running for the nomination will kill her chances
Can't you just hear the whisper campaign now?

"She's unmarried, you know what that means".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. LOL!
Not married=gay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I thought she mentioned
her husband at a dinner party. I think she called him George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. rofl! as if being a black woman wasn't enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Never happen. It violates their "southern strategy"
Republicans would never put a black person on a presidential ticket. They would lose about half their "base."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope, they wont. She'll be on the short list for VeeP though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
46. I think she could be a veep candidate (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. And they would have their ass handed to them.
No way in hell Republicans would ever vote for a black woman. They could kiss the south goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I'd say you called that one.
Even my republican friends here in Ohio barely mask their racist AND sexist feelings when I mention her chances in the WH. Including as a VP candidate.

She'll never make it to the primary ballot, and I doubt she could safely campaign in the deep south.

Fox "News" political analyst is her best hope to stay in the limelight post 2008. I doubt her ego demands such though, and I see her writing books instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I remember when it
was thought that Colin Powell might be a candidate. Gary Bauer and his group said they would have to carefully review Powell's record. That meant that they would be turning over every stone in an attempt to find something very negative about him. Powell and his family knew what was in store so he made the wise decision not to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
49. Stupid..She has never been tested
She is a lousy speaker, no charisma and needs her teeth done!...Has never been on the campaign trail, has never fund raised, can't imagine she would be good at 'shaking babies and kissing hands'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. no way in hell
banana republicans love having their token women and minorities in background positions, just enough to help maintain the illusion that they're not racist. but they ARE racist, they just don't want to be overt about it.

there's no way they'll ever vote for a black woman to be president. if they were to nominate her, they would have the lowest republican turnout ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Better Think Twice,About Mushroom Cloud Rice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is this the same Condaleeza that LIED AGAIN AND AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. I saw something yesterday - on CNN, I believe -
about how people like her. I was like, "What?! Where are these people?" It sounded as if she was being built up for a presidential run, though I don't remember if the story said anything like that. I was too busy going, "Eew! Eew! Who likes her?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SofaKingLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. I remember seeing something like that on CNN.
They said polls show that people have a favorable opinion of her. I think it was about 52%. But having a favorable opinion of someone and believing that person should be president are two completely different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yeah, and now that you mention it
it seems like the idea was that the Badministration is putting Condi out there because people like her. I missed anything about polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. I just thought of an interesting scenario:
if the Pukes nominated Condi and the Dems nominated Hillary.

Considering much of the anti-feminism attitude of many "Macho" Pukes, I'll bet a lot of them will vote Libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. she is black adn female. they are bigots and anti female
this is not something they are just a little of. or something they will let go of to win a fight. they think women are less. they think women belong behind them and blacks below them. they will not hire a black woman to run the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. I hope so...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. She has the bush "taint" all over her...............
Edited on Sun Nov-13-05 01:56 PM by ClintonTyree
whoever the pukes select will have to far removed from the BFEE. They can't afford to have anyone remotely connected to calamity george as a candidate, they'd never be able to get on message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. She would be a horrible politician
No one in the MSM really critically examines her public speaking. It's the same 'ol "she's articulate" backhanded "compliment". She does not know how to deliver a message in a way that a politician with any chance of winning the presidency needs to. Add to that the fact that she is an unmarried AA woman who is disliked by the AA populus and you have a sure loser on your hands. If they want a woman, it would be Elizabeth Dole. She's the only Republican woman who would have a chance. Though, she would most likely be the VP on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoZbean Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. She's too "connected" to this white house
And therefore, too close. They need to distance themselves from Bush to be a viable entity in any election now.

I, myself, don't believe that Rice nor Clinton should be either party's representative in '08. I know there's a lot of Hillary fans out there, but I'm not one of them yet, although I'm trying. I hate that she won't take a legitimate stand against the war. For me, it's all about the war and all that's connected to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. I'm with you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoZbean Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Rice, Clinton or both?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
53. Everything you said.
I don't like Hilary either. I liked Bill - a lot. He seemed like he really wanted to make the world a better place. I think that is why people hated him so much - he was dangerous. He wanted a better world and he had the intelligence and drive to make things happen.

I don't get a genuine feeling from Hilary. She seems ambitious to me - and that's about it. She makes a very good Senator, but I don't want to see her as a President or V.P. For one thing, I'd REALLY like to see someone who was against the war in Iraq from the beginning. Like Dean - for Afghanistan, against Iraq. In hindsight - maybe Afghanistan was a con-job too, but at the time it seemed very reasonable. I am a (I think) moderate Democrat from the mid-West and I was TOTALLY against the war in Iraq from the beginning. I didn't believe the intelligence against Saddam was that damming. It seemed the Bush Administration would say something and within weeks it would turn out to be wrong. Forged documents, etc. If a hick nobody like me was on to Bush, surely the rest of them were too. They lacked the political courage to do the right thing. They didn't want to look weak and uncooperative. Of course - the blood is ALL on Bush's hands - he can't pass the buck to the Dems for allowing him to do what he wanted to do - but I can still be disappointed the Dems didn't have the courage to stand up to him.

I still like to see more of Bill though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Duck Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. McCain has already bought the nomination.
He agreed to play the part of an obedient supporter and friend, and with his populist beliefs and practices, he will get the nomination. Look for Giuliani to compete. Condi will not get the ticket, I doubt she will even run. The Republicans just want to keep her in the forefront for two reasons:

1: To showcase that minorities have a place in the Republican party.
2: TO draw comments that they can construe as racist from the left regarding Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think there might be a video of Condi smiling as she talked of
Edited on Sun Nov-13-05 02:54 PM by alfredo
casualties. Keep an eye out for that.

Found it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch.php?v=-0xB98WMH_w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. Its less than convincing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I know, but then why was that the only part of her comments
Edited on Sun Nov-13-05 03:50 PM by alfredo
that brought a smile? Maybe she is not evil, just one screwed up lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Because the film was heavily edited ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Did CNN do the editing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. No...the website you linked to did the editing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. It was hard to tell because the whole thing was stuttering.
I'm on dialup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Besides the obvious...
...that she's black and a woman...there's a couple other issues that would prevent her from being on the ticket.

She's not been outspoken about being a religious wingnut. From everything I've read, she's pro-choice and pro-affirmative action. She's just a PNACer, guided by her conviction that "eternal struggle" is what "keeps America strong". Her area of expertise is the Cold War Soviet Union and the Cold War in general. She now applies this same limited worldview in the "war on terrorism" in an attempt to prop it up as our next "eternal struggle".

So let's go down the list:

  • black

  • woman

  • doesn't speak in tongues enough and makes too few references to jesus

  • pro-choice?

  • pro-affirmative action?

  • has never been married or had a child, which means jesus hates her

  • pro-war (but the war is one of the areas where there is the MOST internal dissent within the GOP right now, so that's not even all that positive in regards to her possible jockeying for an elected position)


Sorry, pipe dream, but whose pipe dream? And why does this bullshit keep getting bandied about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
48. I was just putting it out there
for discussion sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. No way. The Southern Baptist Convention
which is the same as saying "The South" would never go along with it. One of the principles they voiced in their mission statement a few years ago is that a woman should obey her husband. I'm not kidding. Therefore, they would never support a single woman, how uppity not to have a husband to guide her, childless and black at the same time. She might get nominated, but the South wouldn't go for her. I don't think the North would go for her either; not because of her sex or race but because of her record of incompetence. She's in this administration's morass of lies up to her gappy teeth. And a conservative party trying to look liberal would not score big at the polling place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. If Rice is nominated,
the democrats will win by the biggest landslide in history. I don't think she'll be nominated, though. The Repubs are not that dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. I HATE her so much!!!!! But - does she appeal to Blacks? Women?
That could be a big deal if she does. Even though I'm a woman and I hate her - does she appeal to women? Personally I couldn't care less about the gender or race of the candidate - it is their views that matter to me. True equal opportunity should make gender and race irrelevant - but I'm not sure we're there yet. I don't see Condi as a friend to Women or Blacks, but I'm not sure others share my view?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzledmom Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I saw Alice Walker(Color Purple author) get very angy at
being compared to Condi. She has no support among blacks or women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. That's good to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tomee450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I'm black
and Rice does not appeal to me. I am past voting for someone simply because he is black. I never hear any African Americans expressing a positive view of Ms. Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. If she gets just 1-2% more of the black vote than Bush...
That could make a huge difference in an election.

This is also not about suddenly winning 51% of the African American vote. It's about slowly wearing away one of the big bases of the Democratic Party, one that has been consistently 80-90% Democratic for decades now.

If Condi even makes it to a primary, Republicans can point to that and Clarence Thomas, Rod Paige & Colin Powell, in addition to Alberto Gonzalez.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
34. no chance, Condi's name is being used, though
for the next 2 years, we'll hear a lot about Condi. She may even form an exploratory committee, raise funds, etc.

The sole purpose, as bigwillq said above is to say, "look, one of our top candidates is Condi Rice, who is black and female. We are the party of opportunity if you are black or a woman... after all, we'd never consider her if it was not!"

You don't know how many Freeper types believe that the Republican party is really the place to be if you are black or Hispanic just because of Powell, Rice & Gonzalez. Never mind that almost everybody below them is a lily-white male, or that the ones making the real decisions are lily white males. Pay no attention to that. (Wasn't Powell basically out of the loop when it came to Iraq? I mean, if RWer Bob Woodward is writing that a Saudi ambassaddor knew before Powell, what does that say?)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. Rice as VP on ticket = low turnout & D landslide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. Let's run Carol Mosely-Braun against her.
Edited on Sun Nov-13-05 03:21 PM by IMModerate
I am at least half serious. While I admired Ms. Braun as a candidate, I think she is a long shot, but I would love it because if Dems don't vote for Condi, they are sure to say we are racist and sexist.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. I think it's Rovian, and a good possibility. And she's malleable --
just like W, she would do what they want. CNN referenced a poll yesterday in which she polled higher than all administration figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. She's pro-choice.
never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
43. They need to have a Dem win so we can clean up the mess they
have caused. Dems may not have any ideas (a meme I don't go along with), but the Repugs ideas are ridiculous and costly, both monetarily and in the loss of personal freedoms. Cleaning up after them is a trend that started long ago and will continue. I'm not so sure they (Wash) aren't all (well, ok, not all) in this little dance together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
52. Good. Let them lose enough of their usual racist votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC