Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC discussing White Phosphorus and Italian Report right now....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:25 PM
Original message
MSNBC discussing White Phosphorus and Italian Report right now....
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 01:06 PM by WiseButAngrySara
edited to add link. Sorry was called away from the computer for a while.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8657402/

Tony Maciulis's blog on the Battle of Fallujah...

<snip>

But two reports from the Italian media today are calling into question what weapons and means were used in that battle, and they are spreading rapidly across the Web, including to the Arabic daily Al Jazeera.
First, the Italian newspaper "La Repubblica" is reporting that U.S. troops used white phosphorous on civilians. The Pentagon admits that the substance has been used for the purpose of illuminating target areas, but not on civilians.
Next, an Italian television station aired a documentary today claiming that a new form of napalm was also used in that siege. That documentary is also available online at RAI's website and on several left leaning blogs, but it contains some disturbing footage.
Bloggers have watched and read the reports and have some strong statements today.
The blogger at "The Next Left" says that like the pro-torture lobby, this accusation further undermines America's credibility in this war.
A similar point is coming from "TPM Cafe." This blogger says that the story will cause an even greater shock to the world than the allegations of torture at Abu Ghraib did.
But at "Environmental Republican," this blogger isn't buying the claims. He says the U.S. has not violated any laws. White phosphorous is not a banned substance, and the U.S. uses it in a legal manner.
Before this story gets any bigger on the blogs I wanted to ask an expert to help me understand it better, and truth squad it a bit. I spoke to retired Army Colonel Jack Jacobs and he shed some light on the story, separating fact from fiction.
First, the documentary by Italian state television claims that Mark77 was used, and calls this chemical a "new and improved form of napalm."
Jack tells me that this is not a new form of napalm and is essentially the same stuff that was used in Vietnam. He also says that by law the U.S. military is not permitted to target civilians with the chemical, nor would they be allowed to do so with white phosphorous.
The chemicals are used for the purpose of illuminating targets and not intended nor permitted to be used on civilians. That said, rounds do go astray. I will talk to Jack today about the matter. It has the potential to be a big story.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cheese for the cube rats please
this story is big and I would like the details please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Please see post #9 and updated/edited original post....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. for the love of God let them tell the truth for once...
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 12:32 PM by jsamuel
:pray:


What the heck are they saying?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Willy Peter
Make you a believer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. So are you tv watchers gong to talk among yourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No doubt - see my first post. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ... WiseButAngrySara ... wtf?
OMG OMG OMG, then crickets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So sorry! I was called away from the computer, and have edited my
initial post with links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Do tell!
please???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. BBC report here (link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks and a side note - I find it interesting that MSNBC was
sourcing so many blogs, guess Rolling Stone was right in the fact the blogs/internets is where all of the raw news comes from and places like the NYT's are dinosaurs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Interesting observation...NYT's has been aided in their extinction by
faux reporters like Judith Miller, as well as by blogs/internet, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Question: If they're used to illuminate "targets"
and not civilians and it's dark, how can they tell the difference between a "target" and a civilian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. They illuminated and disintegrated human beings! The 'legal' 'moral'
use of white phosphorus is for illumination purposes, I believe. From what I've read, this use of W.P. was neither legal nor moral.

If they were working in the dark, their illumination became living/dying human souls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh God is that why "WP" was on the Scotty Bingo cards????
I didn't know why willy Pete was on them.

This is about Fallujah isn't it? Oh God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. W.P. =white phosphorus =willy pete =white (house) press =white (house)
prostitutes...who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC