From raging right wing nut:
"Plame could not do what Wilson did (going public) and Wilson could not do what he did without Plame."
From another right wing nut:
"The "goal" of the Plame/Wilson conspiracy was and still is to discredit the President and his adminstration."
"According to the democrat spin machine, Plame was the highly trained and qualified CIA covert agent who investigated arms deals outside the United States concerning our enmeies and terrorist organizations. Wilson was a second rate political hack working as an Ambassador to third world nations and countries so backward they still practice slavery. Had Plame been assigined to find out about the Iraq/Niger negeociations, she would never have been able to speak out about anything she discovered, good or bad. So the highly trained and experienced CIA covert agent was NOT given that assignment, a theatrical Maxwell Smart in the guise of Ambassador Wilson was. So when political discord is needed, Wilson was not bound by any oath or loyality to secrecy or covert operations, so he could expose anything and anybody he wished to the media at his whim and he did."
I got it! I got it! :bounce:
That is the new right wing talking point. And guess what else, it was Zell Miller who came up with it! Yep, ole crazy as a loon Zell! It was in the article he wrote for the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Here it is:
"The agent realizes her spouse can go out on behalf of the spy agency, can distort information, go public with classified information and use all this spy-agency-sponsored material and credentials to try to pull down the current government, and it is all perfectly legal."
"Suppose the spouse adds just one more brilliant, well-aimed lie: claim your foremost political opponent put the spouse up to the trip. As your spouse uses your agency's name to mount attacks, your enemy may fall into your trap. Will your enemy suffer your spouse's lies or take the bait and try to clarify his non-role? If he tells the press he didn't hire your spouse, the press will demand to know, "Then who did?"
"Instead of you violating secrecy laws, it is your victim who is guilty because he tried to set the record straight. Heads, you win; tails, he loses."
"It sounds unbelievable, a fiction, perhaps to be called "To Sting a King." But it is no fiction. This is the story behind Valerie Plame, Joe Wilson and the Bush administration. And it appears that Plame and Wilson will get away with the biggest sting operation ever."
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/1105/02edmiller.html?COXnetJSessionIDbuild102=DpICsoeXn1GNFXprsEA1AZ9UiQg63kGGuelt0fndf1mfmO3I9OBY!64096873&UrAuth=aN`NUOcNVUbTTUWUXUTUZTZU_UWUbU
BIG, BIG, BIG PROBLEMS WITH THAT LOONEY TUNES THEORY!
WHY ON EARTH DIDN'T LIBBY, ROVE, ETC. TESTIFY TO THAT BEFORE THE GRAND JURY RATHER THAN LIE ABOUT WHO THEY HAD TALKED TO AND WHAT THEY HAD SAID?
AND THERE IS NO WAY ON EARTH THAT THE CIA AND THE BUSH/ASHCROFT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT WOULD BE INVESTIGATING THE OUTTING OF A CIA AGENT BY MEMBERS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION IF THERE WERE THE SCINTILLA OF TRUTH TO THAT OUTRAGEOUS THEORY!