Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The bulk of this investigation is done"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:37 PM
Original message
"The bulk of this investigation is done"
Said Fitz, paraphrasing here, and that it's common to "keep a Grand Jury open" after an investigation for additional matters. And that whoever did the original leak isn't charged so no comment.

I don't know now, kids. Maybe this is it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. But they could still call Cheney to testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. What for and why
He implied there is no more grand jury testimony currently planned, but that it is kept open as a matter of course because of indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe
the "investigation" is almost over, now he has to go back and put it together for further charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it is it
But its something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's certainly better than nothing
Although I'd be lying if I said I wasn't really hoping for more.

I guess we will have to wait a little while longer to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Eek. Yuk. Rover OFF THE HOOK for all the evil illegal immoral shit he has
done?

Can't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mutley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. His reputation is still in shambles.
He will never be trusted again. Even if he never gets indicted, he will still pay for what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Look, if he's aiming for more heads he can't SAY so.
Take what you can from this and try not to overly fret... he's playing this straight and narrow and not fudging the rules at all.

The independent counsel rules are different but he's NOT an independent counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not saying to take it as gospel, but......................
this is interesting. Different people have different views of the source, but I've seen many others here use it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5207343
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Letdown.
I wanted to see bodies scattered on the landscape. Total letdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, the crime is described, but intent will trump everything.
Who intended what shows motive and means which leads to additional charges if Fitz can prove it. He's lulling the other team into a flase sense of security. Fitz is really really good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yea, but if the "bulk" is done, that doesn't sound like
A widing investigation to me.

I hope I'm wrong, and that you are right, but that's the sense I'm getting from this.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Fitz is laying a foundation beautifully.
He would be comitting legal malpractice to say he was pre-determining where this was heading. Trust him, he is doing it the way you would a mob crime. The crime and follow all the way up the chain to prove that it was either an individual act or a collective. He also can't lay out his case before he gets to trial. He is preserving the evidence and the White House is truly in a panic right now. It is a beautiful thing to watch.

The fastball of saying Russert so many times to put the press on notice as well. He's firing on all cylinders! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He's playing very high stakes poker
IMHO, I'm not an attorney, but if I were on staff in the White House, I'd be soiling myself. He's not backing down and he's not giving up.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hate to say it but that was my impression too. Still, this is the
beginning of the impeachment movement. I'm still going to have champagne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fitz can't (and won't) say any more.
What do you want him to say? "I'm gonna get those fuckers. All of 'em!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. That bothered me, but....
now I'm not so sure. No comment can mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Technically, he can't and won't comment
He's made the point that he isn't an independent consul as an explanation.

I don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Doesn't Bother Me At All -The Door's Wide Open
The stuff that will come out during this trial will have BushCo going down in flames. It's already begun. I LOVE TODAY! NO EYORES ALLOWED PLEASE, lol...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well, I *was* happy before the press conference, lol
As I said, I hope I'm wrong, but I'm also trying to be honest with my impression, here. I'd rather have the bad news now, heh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. This IS it
He's implying that any remaining open work is simply standard practice.

This case is signed and delivered.

Fini.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. He also isn't opening a new GJ, yet
From what I understand, he is keeping that option OPEN if necessary, but this hasn't been done.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. He can use any GJ that is open - or open a new one - no big deal
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. But that could mean many things. It may mean he has ALREADY gotten the
goods on many others, and is just tying up a few more loose ends before new indictments. It could also mean there isn't going to be much more.

He is very effectively inscrutible to me, but if the evidence is pointing at more indictments, I betcha Fitz was able to make that clear to those who are being considered for them.

I sure would like to see the whole cabal go down, but if this is all, I still think he has done a great job. And he seemed very ethical and above reproach in his answers to the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC