Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media coverage of Bird Flu has just been awful...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 09:55 PM
Original message
Media coverage of Bird Flu has just been awful...
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 09:55 PM by SaveElmer
First, every day we are treated to alarmist headlines, only to find that the articles contain almost no new information...just rehashing what has gone before...

Rarely are all sides presented...just the same "if" the flu mutates it could do this, or "if" the flu mutates it could do that.

No discussion of the different points of view on how likely that is of occurring, or if they do it is always on the alarmist side. There are a number of well respected scientists, virologists, and doctors who do not believe a mutation, or pandemic is imminent.

And last...they can't even agree on the most basic of information..

Here is the last line of an article on abcnews.com

"There is no vaccine to protect against bird flu, but experts believe the standard flu vaccine could help."

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1211542&page=2

And here is CBS...

"A vaccine made from the exact strain of bird flu virus that is causing human deaths could be one of the world's only defenses.

So far trials show the vaccine will work. The question is whether we will be able to produce enough of it in a hurry in a worst case scenario. "

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/13/health/main943374.shtml


Well which is it...will the standard vaccine offer some protection as ABC implies, or won't it as CBS implies. Is there a vaccine in the works as CBS implies, or isn't there as ABC implies?

Just bad, bad, reporting IMO!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media is wise to America's newly created addiction.
Terror. It sells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dontcha just LOVE how they waited until we are smack
in the middle of flu season to hype this stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. It;s an endless source of headlines for them...
What is going to happen can only be speculated, so the media can come up with anything.

"Millions COULD die in pandemic"

"Flu COULD spread quickly in jet age"

"Flu COULD spread through Europe now that the flu has been detected in..."

You can make anything out of it. Of course when you read the articles it is all the same information dressed up differently!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. the coverage has been fowl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6.  I am getting the news from
http://www.iflu.org
Stories from all over the world as they come in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bird Flu Alert Level --> Orange, avoid air travel n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't it just as likely to mutate to a milder, less lethal form?
I would think that the more those little viruses are able to spread, the more laid back they would get, confident in their ability to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That is actually the likeliest scenario...
If it mutates at all. But it isn't scary enough so usually goes unmentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. There is no evolutionary pressure either way.
Normally, a disease has a strong evolutionary pressure to become less damaging to the host. If it is too lethal, it can kill the supply of hosts before it gets a chance to spread very far.

In humanity's hunter-gatherer days, the small size and isolation of the tribes acted as a natural quarantine. If a super bad bug did pop up, it killed one tribe and then died from lack of new victims.

But that barrier is now gone. A bad bug has 6 billion potential meals in front of it before it starts to starve. There is very little selective pressure toward mildness, at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. There is no evidence for that...
The 1918 bug grew in the trenches of WWI, with weak, hungry, immune compromised soldier packed together literally like sardines as their breeding ground. There is no place, even in Asia like that today...The flu has been festering for 8 years in the most populated area on earth and still has not mutated. There are scientists who believe it cannot.

Some even believe in its current form it is becoming less virulent. The death rate has dropped from more than 75% to about 50%.

There were three pandemics in the 20th century, each progressively less severe than the prior one, despite population increases.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think some people are overreacting
I hope so anyway.

I look at it like this. They say if it ever went to the US, millions would die. From what I know, only those in contact with infected birdds have become ill, no human-to-human contact yet.

So they think it will eventually spread from human to human?

If it does spread human to human, why aren't millions projected to die in the Far East?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC