Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miller's twisted tale - UK Gardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:16 PM
Original message
Miller's twisted tale - UK Gardian

Monday October 10, 2005
The Guardian


All the elements for a grand moral drama were in place. A defiant journalist, frail from months in jail, stood before the cameras on a courtroom's steps proclaiming her readiness to sacrifice herself in the name of press freedom.
Judith Miller had spent more time in prison than any American journalist in history for refusing to give up a source. The diminutive 57-year-old New York Times reporter had sat for 85 days in a Virginia penitentiary, sent there by a prosecutor investigating an intelligence leak that threatens the stability of the Bush White House. Yet when she emerged into the light of the day, only after satisfying herself her source wanted her to testify, the absence of acclaim was embarrassingly evident. Not only did the public not seem to care, most of Miller's fellow journalists ranged from sceptical to downright hostile. Journalism's Joan of Arc stood at the stake and a nation shrugged.

"Journalists and media people here are really distancing themselves from Judith Miller," said Michael Wolff, a media critic for Vanity Fair magazine. Miller's lawyers protested that this lack of solidarity undermined her stand against prosecutorial pressure. Whatever the reason, most legal observers agree that the whole case has done nothing for the cause of journalistic privilege in the US.

Reporters have no intrinsic right to keep their sources secret, under a ruling laid down by the Supreme Court in 1972, and that has not been threatened. In fact, Miller's stay in jail may have backfired if US prosecutors are now emboldened, by her eventual agreement to talk, to put more pressure on journalists to give up their sources.

Continued:

http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1588717,00.html?gusrc=rss


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. So if Media and Journalists are distancing themselves
from Judith Miller, will she be fired from The New York Times? Her involvement in the lies that led up to this occupation, and the thousands of people dead should not be rewarded!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Glad that people are distancing themselves from Judy b/c
Judy Miller is NOT protecting journalists and freedom of the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hypocrisy
Those in the Corp. Media that say she is a heroin for standing on the principle of Freedom of the Press are full of shit. They know damn well that she was protecting herself and her RW connections. She is an obvious shill for the Bush Admin., maybe even a traitor to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Disturbed, I know its a spelling error, but you said it best
"...she is a heroin..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'd say she is all of it...especially the traitor part. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other writers, newsies have done time for contempt of court. Not sure
that Judy qualifies as the lone defender of the 1st amendment she's made out to be.

Judy: 85 days.

Vanessa Leggett, freelance writer, author: jailed for 168 days.

List: http://www.rcfp.org/jail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Wow. 168 days. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC