Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FRANKLIN TESTIFIES is the real story. The rest is a Rovian distraction.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:51 PM
Original message
FRANKLIN TESTIFIES is the real story. The rest is a Rovian distraction.
And when I say the rest, I'm referring to the Spy in the White House as well as the Fitzgerald indictment rumors; Rove is certainly not above using himself as a distraction from stories that are truly damaging to the White House. Testimony about AIPAC in court is a hell of a lot more damaging than rumors of indictment, which have been floating around since 2003.

Here's the real story again. MSM, I'm sure with Rove's influence, is omitting these important details:

Oct. 6, 2005 0:10 | Updated Oct. 6, 2005 0:54
Franklin admits: I gave Israel secret material
By NATHAN GUTTMAN
ALEXANDRIA, Virginia

Former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin admitted in court Wednesday he passed classified information to Israeli diplomat Naor Gilon and to two former AIPAC officials, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman.

snip

This was the first time that Israel was explicitly mentioned in the courtroom and that Gilon's name was disclosed. When asked by Judge T.S. Ellis whether he communicated classified information to a foreign official, Franklin replied: "I met occasionally with Naor Gilon from the Israeli embassy."

snip

The indictment speaks of information garnered from two US government officials and relayed to three foreign officials, understood to be senior Israeli Embassy staffers.

JTA reported that one of the US government officials is David Satterfield, then deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs and now the No. 2 man at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. The other is Kenneth Pollack, a Clinton-era National Security Council staffer and now an analyst at the Brookings Institution.

more...

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1128478900053


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. THANK YOU ROBERTPAULSEN
YOU ARE EXACLY RIGHT AND IT'S WORKING RIGHT HERE AT DU

PROOF

ABC BREAKING: Spy in the Whitehouse - LBN 76 replies

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1829810&mesg_id=1829810

Pentagon Analyst Pleads Guility in Spy Case - LBN 4 replies
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1829862
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Glad you mentioned that-
I can't help but notice that your threads were either moved
or sunk like a stone.
Often one in the same in regard to the end result.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Are you really surprised that it is working here at DU?
Are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Could be the other way too.
Perhaps Whitehouse leaked the WH spy news today because today is full of Franklin, Miers, and Roberts first SCOTUS hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's what I'm saying.
This Aragoncillo was kicked out the White House for allegedly being a spy. He has not been indicted, which Bush set as the standard for loss of employment there.

Can you smell the irony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I can smell a diversion. n/t
Notice the implicit link to Gore. Rove is still working, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Daf-daf-dafinitely a diversion
First thing I thought when I read the article was This isn't news, the guy was arrested LAST month!

Like PNAC dragging out ye olde bioweapons/virus routine. Avian flu, tularemia, military lockdowns....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Sorry, I should have been clearer
I think it more likely that the White House dropped the WH spy case now because the Franklin plea, asian bird flu, and Miers would soak up the news oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
34. Actually it's better than that. He had left the WH and was working at the
FBI. The FBI caught him stealing from them last year, as I read. They arrested him last month and in the course of questioning they got info out of him about his previous activities at the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. So what we have are 3 senior American officials vacuuming classified
US documents and passing them on to Israeli intelligence agents in Washington. The other side of this that hasn't been widely reported is the fact that Franklin, an Iran desk officer, was salting Pentagon files with information he received from Gilon and his Mossad cronies about IRAN WMD programs. See, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/15/12176/9231

This is the other side of the operation that stove-piped forged Niger (IRAQ) docs into the eager hands of high Bush Administration policy-makers, and paved the way for the American disaster in Iraq.

The Likudites were trying to push the US into a second war with Iran through exactly the same methods it used against Iraq.

Yes, these is a highly under-reported, major story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A three leaf clover:
Plame, neocon spy, and document forgeries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Thank you "Again," H2O Man for Clearing This Up.
As I try to figure all this out.

Not a four, but a three leaf clover, huh!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Nope. It's a four-leafer.
Plame, neocon spy, document forgeries and war.

Lucky, lucky America! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Astonishing how few people care.
But you keep plugging. Run-of-the-mill espionage is always more important than members of our government plotting to destroy OUR espionage capabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. No, no, please keep plugging!
It's all a bit complicated, with so many players - kind of like a Russian novel. I'm sure there are others like me who appreciate being spoon-fed this information! I learned a lot today. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. let's just call it what it is
The Likudites were trying to push the US into a second war with Iran through exactly the same methods it used against Iraq.

our US soldiers are the surrogate cannon fodder for Israel and to an extent ...the British

some friends.. huh

do we have any real legitimate allies left?

Allies that are not considered mutually parasitic.

Blood Allies

Allies who's soldiers have fought here in defense of our country, our freedom, ours there for them.

Allies who's blood has seeped into
American dirt, and likewise ours there for them

Allies who's native sons are STILL buried here in defense of our freedom.

If you don't know the answer, you know nothing at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. The Answer?
Unfettered testimony from Sible Edmunds.
I think we have all figured out who she has
been prevented from naming in her gag order.
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. "Blair Implicates Iran in Iraqi Bomb Attacks on British Troops" NYT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Great! *'s lapdog is a Weapon of Mass Distortion.
It's a brilliant move, actually. "Regime change" must occur in Iran before they start pricing their oil in euros next year, so the sheeple need to hear about a preemptive event from someone other than the obvious candidates Bush and Sharon. Blair's perfect.

Until someone ties Plamegate to David Kelly, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
58. Perhaps you are thinking of the French?
The French came to our aid during the Revolution at Yorktown and other spots. They also fought the British during the French and Indian WAr, although that was not for our freedom.

The French also fought the Germans in both World Wars. Our dead are buried on their soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountebank Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. And who remembers Kenneth Pollack before the Iraq War....
Talking up the weapons of mass destruction on Charlie Rose and every cable TV channel and then coming with his big mea culpa in the Atlantic Monthly when it all proved to be bullshit? They really pressed the button and activated *that* son of a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zippy890 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I know this is really important
I must be a bit dense, because its a complicated set of facts, but the people involved aren't from the White House clique.

Franklin's from the Pentagon - and this is bad business for sure. Is the fact he pleaded guilty mean other higher-ups might be implicated?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They're from Rummy's clique. Let's not forget how central
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 07:34 PM by leveymg
Donald and Wolfie were to enabling Feith, Wurmser, and Perle to set up the links that funnelled phony intelligence to the White House, and the Office of the Veep, which together eviscerated the CIA's ongoing WMD investigation unit.

Meanwhile, in the Pentagon Office of Special Plans (OSP), the neocons destroyed a lot of good, career people at DIA, and this is their payback time, as well.

Not really that complicated, if you put the two main strands of the neocon-Likudite web together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. and Perle was caught doing this before
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. perhaps we should pass a 3 treason strikes and yer out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Franklin was very much a part
of the neocon crowd that cooked up the false evidence that got us into the War in Iraq, ie the forged documents.

Mostly he was very close to arch-neocon, Douglas Feith, the man who was working on pushing the 'terror' connection lies about Iraq. Douglas Feith left his job in January, to 'spend more time with the family'.

Rumsfeld, Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Condy, Bush, Ari Fleischer and in a supportive, although not as committed way, Tenet, Colin Powell amongst others, and not to forget the Iraq contingency, Chalabi and 'Curveball' and Judith Miller, and Novak. I'm sure I'm leaving someone out.

Oh, and let's not forget the propaganda machine, most notably and by his own claim, Jeff Gannon who claimed he had seen the CIA document which gave the information on Valerie Plame, was questioned by the FBI during which he claimed he had not actually seen it, but 'read about it in a news report'. Only problem with that is, the only report he could have seen was in the WSJ which did not come out until after he claimed to have seen it.



All these stories, and people, are inter-connected (like Aspens, connected by their roots?).

The Valerie Plame story
The Spy in the Pentagon
The WMD lies/DSM
The Dr. Kelly Suicide?

It's late and I know I'm forgetting a few ~ but initially I thought they were all separate. Now, I see they were all connected.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. I like your interpretation of the Aspen reference.
Libby knows better than most how all the stories you mention are connected. Miller may have cut a nice deal just talking about her source and nothing else, but I hope this grand jury will lead to future trials where she will be compelled to talk about more than just the Plame related info Libby, Bolton and the whole cabal fed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Hey, just a sec. HOW did that private letter make it into the news?
Could it be a plant, a deliberate effort to get us riled, while they do something even more evil and nefarious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. I was thinking about that too, I thought I read Libby's lawyer
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 01:16 PM by seemslikeadream
released it, but not sure.

Oh and Merry Fritzmas antifaschits














Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. merry fritz?
and if I respond Bah humbug, will freepers realize that Plan X is going full steam ahead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Don't forget to include Judith Miller spewing Chalabi's lies...
then sitting in jail for 85 wondrous days, only to spring herself just in time to knock this guilty-plea off the front page headlines! It's raining toadies this whole week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. And Chertoff too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. I can sure see what an important breakthrough
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 11:44 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
this must be. Is this going to end up with the military-industrial complex and its sponsors in the administration being brought to book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. KICK-KICK-KICK
KICK!
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Seems like only the surface gets scratched...
I had been hoping that the Plame outing would open the door to the deeper intrigue. Now that the Bush administration has been exposed in so many ways it seems like he and his cronies will be gone and The Machine (my word)) will keep on going.

Anybody remember the song by Lothar and the Hand People? "Machines, machines, they keep on going..."

The cabal is so much deeper than Bushco, but will need to regroup after supporting such an incompetent puppet-leader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You know what, I think this has awoken a sleeping giant that
is stronger than The Machine. I think all those loyal intelligence officers and Pentagon analysts now understand that the enemy is within - and it is NOT the left-wing.

It's subversion from above by an extremist Right-wing cabal with global links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. How deep the exposure goes rests on SCOTUS decision on Sibel Edmonds.
If Sibel remains gagged, Hastert will be President.

If SCOTUS somehow doesn't do the BFEE's bidding, all bets are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Let's hope all bets are off!
And as they say, timing is everything. If Miers replaces O'Connor prior to the Edmond's decision which is likely (Have they actually taken the case yet or is irt still working through?), her loyalst vote may make the difference. Are the objections to her nomination from the right coming from "old conservatives" who are loyal to America and the constitution, or right wing cabalists? (and there are dems and repubs among both groups).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. I was hearing that they needed to decide sometime the next week or so...
The court is supposed to be going in session in the middle of August and they should have decided by then. I'm guessing that unless the Dems have a lot to fear themselves from Sibel's testimony, they won't let this nomination go through before then if they think that this will help them in the long run, to let Sibel's case be heard before a court with O'Connor still on it. O'Connor being on the court is Sibel's best chance at winning the case. I think she can get heard by the 4 votes of the liberal justices (only 4 votes are needed to hear the case). The tricky thing will be getting a 5-4 win with Roberts on the court now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. Yeah, I heard they would hear the case in October.
So the next week or so sounds about right. I'm with you, I hope they rule on it before they get a replacement for O'Connor. Not that she hasn't toted the party line in the past, but with Miers thinking Dumbya is a genius, I fear her more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. So could it be
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 08:44 PM by yodermon
that the Meirs' nomination is really a last-gasp effort to more fully control SCOTUS?

Is that maybe what Radical Cleric James Dobson is hinting about here?:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/10/5/153716/970

"I believe in trusting this president and this time because of the stand that he has taken and the way he has implemented it consistently for four and a half years. When you put that with all the other information that I have been able to gather - and you'll have to trust me on this one - when you know some of the things that I know, that I probably shouldn't know, that take me in this direction, you will understand why I have said, with fear and trepidation, why I have said why I believe that Harriet Miers will be a good justice."


on edit: And when might the SC rule on Sibel's case??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's my thinking.
Miers covered his ass during his National Guard scandal and buried thew evidence well enough that Rather lost his job instead of Bush the election. She has a bad odor to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. It would be Roberts overseeing any impeachment trial of Bush...
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 11:58 PM by calipendence
so the impeachment trial itself would likely not be affected by her being on the court.

However, should he get convicted and the Senate also vote to convict him in effect, then his case could go before the Supreme Court. Not sure, but perhaps he has an "appeal" available for that, which Meiers being on the court would be his "get out of jail free" card, as Thom Hartmann put it.

I'm guessing that this article that was out today about how Tom "Sergeant Schultz" Davis "knew nutink" about the issues around security whistleblowers was related to this as well. Davis didn't want to jeopardize the whistleblowing bill (which the implication was that Bush might veto) if it included security whistleblowers protections in it. Davis is obviously scared for his own skin and wants such a bill to pass (and LOOK like he's trying to stay above this corruption fray), but he's trying to tow the line and not put too big a hot potato in Bush's pocket with that bill protecting whistleblowers.

http://federaltimes.com/index2.php?S=1146772
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
35. Miers is more than a crony - she's part of 9/11 Team Terror
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 06:06 AM by leveymg
As she's part of the criminal malfeasance and cover-up from the beginning, what better way to insure her continued loyalty than to appoint her as a lifetime member of the body that will weigh the judgment?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/10/4/13945/3197
Is Miers the CIA briefer who read Bush the 8/6/01 PDB?
by leveymg
Tue Oct 4th, 2005 at 10:09:45 PDT

Editor & Publisher picked up on a report in the LA Times that Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers was the briefer who read the notorious August 6, 2001 CIA Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) to President Bush. That is startling news in itself, considering that she's also W's lawyer and advised him about the handling of 9/11 after the attacks.

Here's another unexploded bombshell. Up until now, it has been reported that Bush reviewed the Top Secret PDB with an anonymous "CIA briefer."

This raises a few new questions below the fold:

leveymg's diary :: ::
*Is Harriet Miers an employee or operative of the Central Intelligence Agency?

*Or, did someone else in the room read the document to Bush, while Ms. Miers listened?

*What did she advise the President to do, both before and after 9/11, about the terrorist attack?

*What, if anything, will Senators ask her about this subject?

Here's the E&P story:

Miers Briefed Bush on Famous Bin Laden Memo, But Newspapers Handle the AP Photo Quite Differently

By E&P Staff

Published: October 04, 2005 10:45 AM ET

NEW YORK On its front page today, The New York Times publishes a photo of new U.S. Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers going over a briefing paper with President George W. Bush at his Crawford ranch, "in August 2001," the caption reads. USA Today and the Boston Globe carried the photo labeled simply "2001," but many other newspapers ran the picture in print or on the Web with a more precise date: August 6, 2001.

Does that date sound familiar? Indeed, that was the date, a little over a month before 9/11, that President Bush was briefed on the now-famous "PDB" that declared that Osama Bin Laden was "determined" to attack the U.S. homeland, perhaps with hijacked planes. But does that mean that Miers had anything to do with that briefing?

As it turns out, yes, according to today's Los Angeles Times. An article by Richard A. Serrano and Scott Gold observes that early in the Bush presidency "Miers assumed such an insider role that in 2001 it was she who handed Bush the crucial 'presidential daily briefing' hinting at terrorist plots against America just a month before the Sept. 11 attacks."

So the August 6 photo may show this historic moment, though quite possibly not . . . Two others in the background are Deputy Chief of Staff Joe Hagin and Steve Biegun of the national security staff."

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001221205




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. That is a scary thought, yoderman.
Miers being appointed to keep Sibel gagged. At first I wondered what the motive would be, but seeing that picture of Miers on August 6, 2001 it hit me: Miers knows!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick and nominating -- EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. All Right RP
Good for spotlighting this. Not a peep on any news show tonight, not even Olberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. KICK
And furthermore...
:kick:
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. Sometimes an important situation gets overlooked.
This is one of those. The Bushco Neo Fascists are well financed and devious. Dems need to stall out this Fundie Bush crony for as long as they can and keep insisting on memos and docs. This time they better not back down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. It May Be Overlooked For Now
But that won't stop it from happening. People need to send emails asking why this wasn't reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. How many right here don't even know about it?
The "burial" it's getting by the media is too frustrating! Emailing the press is a good idea, but it's not even getting the proper attention on a progressive site like this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
38. Well, this situation does tend to tie all the co-conspirators together.
It HAS to reveal the PNAC network. Toss in the DSM and exposuring a CIA op on WMDs and you can easily recognize what amounts to the most criminal administration in US History.

I just hope the full potential of exposing the ENTIRE network is realized. We need to clean house, big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
42. Nice catch. You have a good point.
" Rove is certainly not above using himself as a distraction from stories that are truly damaging to the White House. Testimony about AIPAC in court is a hell of a lot more damaging than rumors of indictment"

It would not be the first time that he played this game. (I really hope that you are wrong and that indictments are on the way, but we need to keep our eyes open.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
48. This is SO important!
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 09:51 PM by Holly_Hobby
Franklin worked under Feith in the Office of Special Plans, the same office that built up the so-called intelligence case for the war. The Niger uranium story came out of the OSP. Franklin has been quoted as saying that Israeli gov't gave him more than he gave them.

I can't forget what Justin Raimondo reports:

Robert Dreyfuss, writing in The Nation, cites a highly placed former intelligence official who points the finger directly at Israel:

"According to the former official, also feeding information to the Office of Special Plans was a secret, rump unit established last year in the office of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel. This unit, which paralleled Shulsky's – and which has not previously been reported – prepared intelligence reports on Iraq in English (not Hebrew) and forwarded them to the Office of Special Plans. It was created in Sharon's office, not inside Israel's Mossad intelligence service, because the Mossad – which prides itself on extreme professionalism – had views closer to the CIA's, not the Pentagon's, on Iraq. This secretive unit, and not the Mossad, may well have been the source of the forged documents purporting to show that Iraq tried to purchase yellowcake uranium for weapons from Niger in West Africa, according to the former official."

...

It may well be treason, as many people say, to expose an undercover U.S. intelligence officer. So what do we call funneling disinformation to the President on behalf of a foreign power – high treason?

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=1031

Justin's documention on how the FBI pinched Franklin, note that Franklin's crimes go back 30 years.

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=5857

The dots are there for all to see.

RP - no luck with the scanner, huh?

:hi:

Mods, please don't "disappear" this post. Read this by Juan Cole first:

Note that over 80% of American Jews vote Democrat, that the majority of American Jews opposed the Iraq war (more were against it than in the general population), and that American Jews have been enormously important in securing civil liberties for all Americans. Moreover, Israel has been a faithful ally of the U.S. and deserves our support in ensuring its security. The Likudniks like to pretend that they represent American Jewry, but they do not. And they like to suggest that objecting to their policies is tantamount to anti-Semitism, which is sort of like suggesting that if you don't like Chile's former dictator Pinochet, you are bigoted against Latinos.

http://www.antiwar.com/cole/?articleid=3467
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Thanks for all these links and info...
You are so right, this is significantly more important than any NYC security scare, Rovian-shirking-Plame-blame-tactics, or any Philippino spy. And now we even have bomb scares at the Washington monument! What a busy news week it's been - even the bogus Miers nomination & subsequent outcry! I've watched and listened and googled galore and aside for one vague hometown newspaper article on this subject, hardly any info at all to be found in the mainstream media.

The possibility of the yellowcake forgery tie-in is sure worthy of a whole, new independent investigation...wonder if that's why Franklin copped a plea, to get it done quickly and quietly? Just the connection between our National Security Council and AIPAC that he referred to during the hearing should be raising lots of eyebrows and also the way the prosecutors clamped shut his testimony, right in the middle of a sentence about "murders" and the Iranian government, really makes me wonder why a career Pentagon analyst, with expertise on Iraq and Iran, would take three felony counts and give up his freedom rather than bring "harm to the United States".

How in the world is this not the top story? They certainly have everyone well-trained!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Yes - lap dogs n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
53. A footnote from John Dean:
(page 101 of "Worse Than Watergate") "* Ironically, Scooter Libby represented fugitive financier Marc Rich and told Congress, after he became Cheney's chief of staff, that he believed the prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office had 'misconstrued the facts and the law' when they went after Rich on tax evasion charges. This, of course, was one of the principal reasons Clinton pardoned Rich."

Small world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. A guilty plea to avoid death...
from the NeoFascist cabal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Libby is
going to fight the charges. He may face serious time, and he will attempt to put up a fight that produces issues for appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Which will leads to more exposure.
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 09:00 PM by kohodog
I think he's on the inside of the Bush family team, and if anyone is pardoned I would expect it to be Libby.

And his lawyer will be.....BAKER?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC