Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT (on Miers): "In Midcareer, a Turn to Faith to Fill a Void"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:06 PM
Original message
NYT (on Miers): "In Midcareer, a Turn to Faith to Fill a Void"
DALLAS, Oct. 4 - By 1979, Harriet E. Miers, then in her mid-30's, had accomplished what some people take a lifetime to achieve. She was a partner at Locke Purnell Boren Laney & Neely, one of the most prestigious law firms in the South, with an office on the 35th floor of the Republic National Bank Tower in downtown Dallas.

But she still felt something was missing in her life, and it was after a series of long discussions - rambling conversations about family and religion and other matters that typically stretched from early evening into the night - with Nathan L. Hecht, a junior colleague at the law firm, that she made a decision that many of the people around her say changed her life.

"She decided that she wanted faith to be a bigger part of her life," Justice Hecht, who now serves on the Texas Supreme Court, said in an interview. "One evening she called me to her office and said she was ready to make a commitment" to accept Jesus Christ as her savior and be born again, he said. He walked down the hallway from his office to hers, and there amid the legal briefs and court papers, Ms. Miers and Justice Hecht "prayed and talked," he said.
....
It was a pivotal personal transformation for the woman now named for a seat on the United States Supreme Court, not entirely unlike that experienced by President Bush and others in the Texas political and business establishment of that time. Ms. Miers, born Roman Catholic, became an evangelical Christian and began identifying more with Republicans than with the Democrats who had long held sway over Texas politics. She joined the missions committee of her church, which is against legalized abortion, and friends and colleagues say she rarely looked back at her past as a Democrat....

http://nytimes.com/2005/10/05/politics/politicsspecial1/05miers.html?hp&ex=1128484800&en=572c2c837182ce54&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is she a SCOTUS nominee or a papal nominee? I'm confused.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I didn't even know the NYT had a "Religious Background" section
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. She wants to be an Evangelical theocratic nominee
Mostly protestant. She left the Catholics and joined the evangelical extremists. She's a Texan evangelical crony of W who thinks W is the most brilliant man in the world.

I've read many articles on W having an inferiority complex. This nomination cements that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. She wants to become a theocratic SC judge
Implementing her interpretation of the law on our society. She's kind of twisted. She thinks W is brilliant? Why does W attract women who have never had a husband or children? Very odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. She's recommended by the 700 Club
as the "first evangelical Protestant on the court since the 1930's."

A SC Justice lauded by the 700 Club...Interesting times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. and recommended by the very sick James Dobson
Bush is looking for theocracy on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. And at what point did she rededicate her life to evil, death and treason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. some news caster said today She became a Christian. What does
that make a Catholic? (her previous Religion). Or was there a gap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. At the age of 35
I think she faced the fact that she was going into a pre menopause stage, and she had no husband nor children. So she chose an alternative dedication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Post's version is even more concrete about her views on abortion
One evening in the 1980s, several years after Harriet Miers dedicated her life to Jesus Christ, she attended a lecture at her Dallas evangelical church with Nathan Hecht, a colleague at her law firm and her on-and-off boyfriend. The speaker was Paul Brand, a surgeon and the author of "Fearfully and Wonderfully Made," a best-selling exploration of God and the human body.

When the lecture was over, Miers said words Hecht had never heard from her before. "I'm convinced that life begins at conception," Hecht recalled her saying. According to Hecht, now a Texas Supreme Court justice, Miers has believed ever since that abortion is "taking a life."

"I know she is pro-life," said Hecht, one of the most conservative judges in Texas. "She thinks that after conception, it's not a balancing act -- or if it is, it's a balancing of two equal lives."

Hecht and other confidants of Miers all pledge that if the Senate confirms her nomination to the Supreme Court, her judicial values will be guided by the law and the Constitution. But they say her personal values have been shaped by her abiding faith in Jesus, and by her membership in the massive red-brick Valley View Christian Church, where she was baptized as an adult, served on the missions committee and taught religious classes. At Valley View, pastors preach that abortion is murder, that the Bible is the literal word of God and that homosexuality is a sin -- although they also preach that God loves everybody.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/04/AR2005100401765.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. And Reid wants to approve this person?
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 10:30 PM by Erika
They better be asking women voters what they think about it. I won't donate to any candidate/party who votes for a nominee who is against the rights of a woman to choose based on her personal religious beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. People like to OPINE! ----------- ------------ ----------- > MP3
http://news.globalfreepress.com/mp3/aar/mm/bush-Harriet%20Miers-aar-mm.mp3

rofl - Bush Quotes on the issue, surtesy -> AAR/MM

psst... pass the word ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm not predisposed against someone b/c of their relgious beliefs
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 10:40 PM by Charlie Brown
and just because someone is personally opposed to abortion (like many Dems) says nothing about their views on Roe and the right to choose.

This factor is not a valid reason to oppose Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Arrrrrrrrrrrrrgh! This is totally irrelevant to the office
Article VI, Section III of the Constitution:

"No religious test shall ever be required, as a qualification to any office or public trust, under the United States."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you
It's very disconcerting to see posters at DU become the right-wing sterotype of anti-religious God-haters.

Judge Miers by her judicial views and professional career and not her religious beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. If We Are to Judge Her on That, They Need to Let Us See That
Judge Miers by her judicial views and professional career and not her religious beliefs.

She has no judicial views expressed in court decisions, because she has never been a judge.
We also criticize her for her lack of judicial experience, of course.
We don't get to see much of her recent professional career, because the administration has invoked "executive privilege".

What we can see of her professional career includes trying to get the ABA to rescind its support for Roe v. Wade.
You will have to pardon us if this runs up a bit of a red flag,
particularly given her stated religious views.

To criticize a potential Supreme Court Justice on these grounds is not "god-hating".
We are trying to protect our pluralistic society, for the good of people of all religions and no religion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Funny how many "double" conversions in Texas in the mid 80s
eh? As Reagan courted the evangelical right and the "southern strategy" entered its highest phase of sucess, Democrats in Texas and other points south (in public life) saw the future: and climbed on board by becoming Republicans and joining churches whose primary statement of faith was "born again" as the overriding doctrine. None of these people "looked back" because they saw where the opportunities were.

But, of course, to suggest that is "bad" or "mean spirited" but isn't it funny that so many in contemporary Republican politics found Jesus and Lee Atwater at about the same time? hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. translation- she no longer wanted to pursue independant thought and
decided to whore herself out to the alpha dogs around her.

These Wingnut women are filled with self loathing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC