|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:21 PM Original message |
Cool Holland thing -- three-way marriage! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorCalDem
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Freepers will be extra PO'd over this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Freepers need to read their Bible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. The Bible is hardly the place to look for the way to treat women, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Point was, this alternative lifestyle is traditional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. No. Marriage is also a way to legally protect children. It is not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
37. polygeny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Might work for some republican "serial monogamists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. What gets complicated about that situation is not the social aspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
28. In most states, marital status doesn't have all that much affect on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
46. It might in that particuliar situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 12:51 AM Response to Reply #46 |
93. I would think bio-mom would have parental rights, and caring-mom would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hello fellow rainbow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Same here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:39 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Tha national in Oregon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. May be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why do you assume there will be two women in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mntleo2
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Yeah I Wouldn't Mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. Actually, a two man, one woman arrangement would work best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
76. Dissagre... a man needs two women, or maybe a woman and a sheep.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. It is wrong because someone gets exploited. Either the first wife does or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. To each their own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. So - do you think slavery would be "ok" as long as the "slave" agreed and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I guess if we buy "made in China" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Some are, some aren't. That is the point. The law has to protect the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. if someone agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. People get themselves into financial difficulties. They might "agree" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. and that is different from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. The key point is "equal". Three way marriages are often going to derail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
52. Well, that's their business, isn't it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. No it isn't just "their business". Children get no say in the matter so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:50 PM Original message |
well, not all marriages result in children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
64. Well - half don't fail. And when they do fail children are protected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:44 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. I would have no problem making marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Porcupine
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 01:00 AM Response to Reply #33 |
95. It's called military service |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
74. Do you know what the legal consequences of what this trio have done are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. You're really making a leap here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Illogical leap? Is it a coincidence then that both slavery and polygymy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Consensual relationships do not equate to oppression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. See how it works out in 25 years. The article may not have told the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Okay, I'll let you know how my relationships are doing in 25 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:29 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. 33 years and counting. Been through all the parts of the marriage vows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #55 |
70. As I said, I'll get back to you in 25 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
51. Let me guess: you're not big into BDSM either, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:41 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. How is that relevant to the discussion? I just don't happen to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
belle
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
48. Except for, they're all married *to each other*--different from OT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Yes, different on the surface from the OT. Call me a skeptic. See how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. So, how does this work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's it. I'm moving. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. some liberals gets upset because polygamy is often |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. "Asked by journalists to tell the secret of their...relationship..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. i sorta agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
77. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. I know some people in "group marriages." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
72. What have they done for legal agrements? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #72 |
92. No idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mshasta
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
30. two men...one woman.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. polyandry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Last time I checked, we were in the animal kingdom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. if you say so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. And it is RARE in the animal kingdom. Each species has a mating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
USA_1
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
89. Most human societies are polygamist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
funflower
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Welcome to DU, Rainbow Gather! Glad to see you're from God's country! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainbow gatherer
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 04:27 PM Response to Reply #94 |
100. That's a great photograph. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. So this observation of a natural occurrence in the animal kingdom... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mshasta
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. blah......blah....blah.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Not legalize it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
34. I want three wives and two husbands! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
39. Great...now anti-gay marriage types can say : "See we told you." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. They can say whatever they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
60. I take offense to being characterized as "reactionary and bigoted" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. I didn't call YOU reactionary and bigoted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #47 |
67. They will say it and the country will believe them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:09 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Well this is exactly what bothers me about this argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:56 PM Response to Reply #39 |
75. oh yawn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. the fundies won't change their arguement one Lick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. you are so right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. :P |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:21 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. but it hurts their beautiful minds!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
53. The problems that I see with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. a partnership does not equal "2" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 04:20 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Well the birth parents might not be in the "best interests of the child" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. "Two chicks at the same time!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
61. An old David Crosby song... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
73. i think it's time to go euro |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:05 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. ya think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:09 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. i thought they spoke french? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:11 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. i think in franglais all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
85. I guess some DUers have moved so far to the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:47 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. i couLd take that either way i suppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sadiesworld
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:48 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 06:55 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. i'LL take it as someone(s)' bad side then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
90. Oh, man - Freeper heads exploding as we type |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr_Spock
![]() |
Mon Oct-03-05 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
91. Oh, man - Freeper heads exploding as we type |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
U4ikLefty
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
96. Why the hell would I want TWO wives nagging me?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 06:30 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. i hear digging, but i don't hear chopping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fescue4u
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
97. That would be fun for about 10 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kailassa
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 04:30 AM Response to Original message |
98. USA_1 and anyone else who thinks polyandry only occurs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritingIsMyReligion
![]() |
Tue Oct-04-05 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
101. "Cool"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Apr 22nd 2021, 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC