Another case of how US MSM tries to ignore certain stories:
La Republica and Corriere della Serra, two of Italy's top dailies, reported in August about an online "gallery of horrors" -- photos of mutilated Iraqis and Afghans that U.S. soldiers had posted on the Internet in return for access to a pornographic Web site. The story, which was first circulated by a 20-year old Italian blogger who calls himself Staib, drew no interest from English-language news organizations. Once upon a time, the story would have died then and there.
But Staib's story was picked up by Helena Cobban, a journalist and blogger in Charlottesville, Va., and then by University of North Carolina law professor-blogger Eric Muller, who wondered if Staib's claims could amount to "The Next Abu Ghraib?"
Conservative maverick blogger Andrew Sullivan commented on the story on Sept. 18. Two days later, Mark Glaser of the Online Journalism Review followed up with a story quoting Christopher Wilson, proprietor of the porn site allegedly involved (whose name includes a four letter word and won't be published or linked to here).
Wilson defended the gory pictures allegedly obtained from U.S. soldiers in Iraq by saying, "I see pictures taken by CNN and the mainstream media, and they all put their own slant on what they report and what they show. To me, this is from the soldier's slant."
On Wednesday, Chris Thompson, columnist for the East Bay Express, a weekly in Berkeley, Calif., followed up with this story -- "U.S. Soldiers Swap Gore for Porn." Wilson told Thompson that European reporters had predicted the U.S. media wouldn't pick up on the story because "it's such a sore spot. ... It raises too many ethical questions. ... I started to laugh, because it's true."
http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2005/09/online_media_br.html