Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAA Response to Katrina vs. FAA Response to Rita:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:36 AM
Original message
FAA Response to Katrina vs. FAA Response to Rita:
FAA Response to Hurricane Katrina
Operations Overview

Within less than 24 hours, employees and equipment were sent to the hurricane-stricken region and New Orleans airport was open for relief missions. Within less than 72 hours, all airports were open. Only New Orleans Lakefront Airport remains closed because of extensive water damage.
more...
http://www.faa.gov/news/news_story.cfm?type=fact_sheet&year=2005&date=090905


FAA Response to Hurricane Rita
...
FAA air traffic facilities in Houston and Beaumont-Port Arthur have been moving FEMA evacuation flights for several thousand people to other cities in Texas and to Ft. Smith, Arkansas over the past two days.

Early this morning, air traffic controllers from San Antonio relieved co-workers who have been working overtime at the Beaumont Air Traffic Control Tower to help the military evacuate citizens. The Beaumont Tower crew helped the military airlift 4,000 people out of danger, many of them sick and elderly. Despite having worked long hours, these employees initially refused to leave the tower, even though they had families and homes to evacuate. They agreed to step aside only when the San Antonio contingent arrived at 1 a.m.

In preparation for the hurricane, the FAA has set up a staging area in Austin, Texas to pre-deploy teams and equipment that may be needed after the storm. The teams will assess any damage to radars, navigational aids and FAA facilities as quickly and possible and will move in temporary or replacement equipment. The FAA’s Communications Support Team has also deployed its mobile van to Austin and is ready to deliver satellite phones to any facilities that need them.
...
http://www.faa.gov/news/news_story.cfm?type=fact_sheet&year=2005&date=092305


From what I can tell, the FAA helped PREPARE for Hurricane Rita but only RESPONDED to Hurricane Katrina. And this is the really disturbing part:

"...The FAA’s Communications Support Team has also deployed its mobile van to Austin and is ready to deliver satellite phones to any facilities that need them."
(from the Rita Response link)

Why weren't satellite phones delivered to the area hit by Katrina???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm bookmarking THIS puppy.
Great catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would hope they learned something
from Katrina and that they *would* have had better preparations for Rita. I guess it would bother me more if they hadn't learned and had done just as badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. The quick answer to the satellite phone question
is that all the plans for NOLA assumed that at least one communication system would stay up and running. The plans were wrong. City, state, federal. The feds rely on the locals for knowledge of what the local first responders actually have.

Knowing the plans were wrong the first time, you'd expect them to not make the same assumptions the second time.

Some of the rest is specificity of requests. Perry learned that 'help!' is an insufficient request (just as he learned that waiting until 11 hours before high winds set in before implementing evacuation plans is also a mistake). Feds aren't omniscient; he has a larynx, and used it. But insufficiently.

This morning the news folk were saying that neither Blanco nor Perry got the request for more NG troops right. Do they want munitions experts or medics? Supply clerks or rescue squads? Where? For what? They didn't say what they wanted, in writing (I think Perry said what he wanted, but not in writing; and Blanco requested the troops in writing, but not what she wanted).

And there were screw-ups. Apparently Houston and Beaumont both had contracts with the same people to provide a huge number of ambulances for evacuations. Houston evacuated first, and got the ambulances; that left Beaumont with a big problem until the last minute. NOLA nursing homes had the same problem--numerous contracts for services with one provider who only had limited, insufficient, resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Possum Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good assessment
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC