Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AccuWeather Forecast Versus NHC (NHC forecast "virtually useless")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
A-Possum Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:04 PM
Original message
AccuWeather Forecast Versus NHC (NHC forecast "virtually useless")
AccuWeather Forecast Versus NHC
Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:04 PM EDT

The awesome power of nature will be in full display as Rita heads toward the Gulf Coast Friday night into Saturday. The graphic above shows the huge extent of the powerful winds of Rita as forecast by AccuWeather.com meteorologists.

The graphic from the National Hurricane Center shows much less confidence in the storm's impact. This product is designed to be used by government and emergency management officials. Their forecast is for less than a 50% chance of hurricane force winds along the coast of northeastern Texas and southwestern Louisiana. AccuWeather feels this forecast is virtually useless.


That's about as low and ugly as it gets. And completely misleading, as the NHC has released numerous forecasts of hurricane force winds in this area.

Just what we need, privatized, politically motivated weather forecasting. Wonderful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. They can try to sell this BS to us, but Frist should know we know better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Santorum's staffers probably wrote this
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 06:09 PM by Gman
where will it all end and how bad will the final damage toll be? Not Rita, but the aftermath of The Coup Of 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. re: santorum
i was just about to make a comment about Santorum's ridiculous weather bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. see also: Santorum, Rick (R - PA)
Ricky "man-on-dog" Santorum wants to prohibit the public from accessing the National Weather Service data directly - instead you'd have to rely on a private company like .... wait for it... Accuweather!! Coincidentally, AccuWeather is based in State College, PA and was a Santorum Campaign contributor. Who'da thunk?!

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05126/499873.stm

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/219-05052005-485185.html

Just another reason to loathe the third Senator from the great state of Virginia. As if we needed extras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. AW founded by Penn State grads - Santorum's alma mater
There is a definite buddy-buddy deal with Accuweather and Santorum - both have Penn State roots. Now I'm not dissing Penn State as I am an alum too who bleeds blue and white. But I just wanted to point out the connection.

Yes, I know, I know, beloved Joe Paterno is a repuke too. I like JoePa for most of what he stands for but, politically, he is a little wacked. I think he is old school repub - fiscally conversative.

Oh, BTW, if you check out Accuweather for Houston, there is a little plug for George Senior:
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/forecast.asp?partner=accuweather&myadc=0&traveler=1&zipcode=77001&metric=0

George Junior:
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/forecast.asp?partner=accuweather&myadc=0&traveler=1&zipcode=76638&metric=0

Little Rock? Funny - no mention of the 42nd President
http://wwwa.accuweather.com/forecast.asp?partner=accuweather&myadc=0&traveler=1&zipcode=72201&metric=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Message to Santorum: Bite Me
Fuck the Foxization of weather news. Unreal.

No surprise from the leading Anti-Science Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Let the dog I've been dating bite that Repuke motherbleeper. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. First, the NWS forcast they refer to is EXPERIMENTAL
it says it clearly on the image. Second, ALL meterology is based on chance. AccuWx is free to take the legal risk for being off if they want to. It is better to be safe than sorry, espically this far out from landfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Santorum's Repugs only believe their own "Sound Science."
I guess that's why Governor Perry was so Upbeat on Matthews. AccuWeather must have told him Huston/Galveston is "Free and Clear."

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. AccuWeather is also spewing that;
these storms have nothing to do with global warming. All weather is cyclical and we don't have records that go back that far.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. That's actually true
We only have a hundred years of hurricane data, and half of that of really good hurricane data.

Scientifically, it's completely impossible to say that global warming is making hurricanes worse than they would normally be because we have no idea what is normal with so few data points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's sensationalization for website hits, and through website hits
revenue from banner ads - and paid subscriptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Possum Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. DHS used accuweather for Katrina instead of NWS?
I got this off the Eastern US Weather forum, but no link, and I can't find the source.

The Senate Commerce Committee held hearings this afternoon on
Katrina. The House Science Committee will be holding hearing
Wednesday morning (9/21). Sen. Ben Nelson (Florida) asked Max
Mayfield whether it was true that Secretary Chertoff (the head of
homeland security) & Department of Homeland Security (DHS) used
Accuweather for hurricane forecasts of Katrina and he confirmed it.
The National Infrastructure Command Center in DHS prepared
an "overnight summary" for Secretary Chertoff on Katrina that was
based on Accuweather hurricane predictions rather than hurricane
forecast information from the National Hurricane Center. This dates
from when former PA. Governor Ridge was Secretary of homeland
security.

What's even most shocking is that the "NOAA Desk" in the DHS Ops
Center, staffed by a primary & two backup NWS meteorologists, prepared
forecasts for Secretary Chertoff based on the National Hurricane
Center; however, it is unsure that this ever made it to the
Secretary. To make matters worse & even more confusing, FEMA relies
solely on NWS products, which includes those issued by the National
Hurricane Center. So FEMA (which only uses NWS) and the DHS (which
uses Accuweather) are not even looking at the same forecasts! The NWS
NHC's track for Katrina was significantly different & more accurate
than Accuweather's. Just recently, Accuweather's track for Ophelia
brought it across Florida & into the Gulf. In both cases,
Accuweather's forecast was dead wrong. The end result is that the
head of homeland security & DHS & FEMA received conflicting forecasts.

Sen. Bill Nelson also asked Max Mayfield about consolidation and
downsizing of WFOs and Max Mayfield unequivocally said it was a very
bad idea, and that he hopes that it doesn't happen and that the local
WFOs are an essential part of NWS. Senator Nelson also trashed
Accuweather and, without naming Santorum, blasted those who would try
to take NWS off the air and off the internet to help commercial
interests.


Accuweather's Katrina and Ophelia forecasts were way off; while the NWC nailed it. No wonder we have a problem, Houston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. This is key
To make matters worse & even more confusing, FEMA relies
solely on NWS products, which includes those issued by the National
Hurricane Center. So FEMA (which only uses NWS) and the DHS (which
uses Accuweather) are not even looking at the same forecasts! The NWS
NHC's track for Katrina was significantly different & more accurate
than Accuweather's. Just recently, Accuweather's track for Ophelia
brought it across Florida & into the Gulf. In both cases,
Accuweather's forecast was dead wrong. The end result is that the
head of homeland security & DHS & FEMA received conflicting forecasts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. this is not LBN......and both maps show the same thing
the cutesy color accurweather map shows the same basic thing as the NHC map. misleading propaganda.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/clark2008.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fox News uses Accuweather Forecasts in their weather reports.
At least it did when I flipped over the channel then let it sit for 15 seconds while they did the weather report. Thought at least THAT would be "fair and balanced".

Guess I was incredibly wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Notify AccuWeather that their endorsement of Sanctimonius
leads us to seek forecasts from any source BUT theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I've never seen anything on the Accuweather site like this:
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 07:10 PM by Gman
Be sure to click on the Trp Frcst Pts check box to track Rita's eye against the forecast track. Click on other check boxes for pressure lines (MSLP), roads and counties or current radar.

Be sure to click the MSLP button to display the pressure lines. As of right now (7:07 p.m. CDT) you can clearly see the dividing lines between the two high pressures (1008 & 1012), which Rita has been looking for. The 1012 to the right is the high that was expected to move to the east and force the northwest turn. This makes me wonder if the models will react to this and move landfall even further east.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/gmex-ir4-loop.html

This is a cool product.

Warning: Only click this if you have a high speed connection. It's heavy on Java and loads a ton of data.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Possum Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. HAH They edited out the part about NHC
now it only says This product is designed to be used by government and emergency management officials.

Is that why this got moved out of LBN? LOL, I don't care but it did say that earlier about the NHC forecast is virtually useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Accuweather likes to guess. They're notorious for this.
I can guess where a hurricane is going to go. Doesn't mean I can predict it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC