Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RAW STORY: Developing: Shocker: Ex-President Carter says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:59 AM
Original message
RAW STORY: Developing: Shocker: Ex-President Carter says
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 10:59 AM by SharonRB
Shocker: Ex-President Carter says
Gore won 2000 election

I just saw this on Raw Story. Just popped up. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. hmmm thanks for the heads up.
What's the story I wonder... since we know Gore won the election, I guess it's that Carter said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes..."Join the list of people who agree with you, Mr. President"...
It will be interesting to see what the "story" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eglide Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gore did win the popular vote.
Never was a dispute about that. The electoral votes is where the
dispute was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. But you'd have to be from Oz to believe the the Chimp won Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Yes, but it is now established from many sources Gore won Florida's
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 11:22 AM by Hissyspit
electoral votes. I assume that is what Carter is confirming as his opinion.

Even if you factor OUT the very real and deliberate attempts to suppress (felons list, bad vote count) votes for Gore in Florida, he STILL came out ahead.

It was a travesty of democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. Exactly. I'm guessing Carter is confirming that Gore won Florida, too
which would have given him the electoral vote as well.

The NORC handcount done by the University of Chicago shows clearly that even if you ignore all of the clearly double-punched ballots--and there were around 50,000 of these and they were clearly meant to go to Gore--that Gore still won the election.

NORC didn't say this: all they did was categorize each ballot and report the totals. So if a ballot had been marked "not counted" by the machine counts, they would examine the ballot and categorze it. Like "three corner hanging chad for Gore" or "one corner hanging chad for Bush."

Their results found several thousand ballots that had clear votes--no hanging chads, no problems whatsoever--that the machines simply didn't count, possible because the ballot itself wasn't cut to spec. Counting those ballots, which were 100% undisputable, because they were punched just like the ballots that were counted--Gore won.

Counting hanging chads marked for one candidate or another Gore won, in almost every combination you could find of how to determine the intent of the voter. One variation, and I forget exactly how it was worded, showed Bush winning.

In short, the NORC count showed that if Florida law had been followed and all votes had been counted (don't say recount, because we are talking about votes that were not counted at all, much less recounted) Gore would have won the electoral votes.

Remember, even the Supreme Court unanomously said that there were legally cast votes that were never counted in their Bush v Gore decision. But by a 5-4 margin, the Court ruled that the votes didn't have to be counted to decide the election.

Just a primer. Welcome to DU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. On the one way Bush won Florida in 2000
Was if the only recounts were in the heavily democratic Counties as Gore had asked the court (And the Court ruled it would not do, instead extending the recount to ALL Counties).

It appears the Democratic Counties actually counted their votes accurately, Gore NOT getting enough votes to overcome Bush's lead. The problem for Bush was in the GOP controlled Counties, they it appears all of the GOP votes were counted BUT MANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC VOTE HAD NOT BEEN.

Thus Gore picked up the votes he needed to win NOT in the Democratic Counties but in the GOP controlled Counties (Thus Gore should have asked for a full-recount NOT a partial recount). Furthermore the only way Bush would have won Florida was the only one a Florida Judge said HE WOULD NOT HAVE PERMITTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Thanks. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. No story yet, just a headline on the main RawStory page at the moment
Near the top of the main page...

    Shocker: Ex-President Carter says
    Gore won 2000 vote: Developing...


What's w/ the "Developing..."? Is Raw Story our truth-based counter for Sludge Report?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Raw Story does that all the time
When they're working on a story, they post it as a teaser and say "Developing." I'll keep checking back during the day to see if they post a real story. I hope it comes out today, because I'll be off line all weekend after I leave for DC tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Original message
Linketty-link please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Very interesting. An ex-president calling another president illegitimate.
Come on, Jimmy: lay it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Always knew Bush was a bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. May I have a link, please?
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Link:
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 11:04 AM by bleever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. I get the feeling something is really about to blow wide open.
I have never seen ex-presidents slamming the current president. Carter and Clinton have both been taking some shots at bush lately. And the Dibold-throat thing is heating up; Able Danger; Plame; even Spector trying to convince Bush to put off the next court nomination.

Is the house of Bush on the verge of collapse for real this time? God I hope we're nearing the end of thins insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. i think so too
Something strange IS going. Maybe the ex-presidents know something about Bush and think it is more important to help get him removed than to keep "presidential quiet" anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. I concur
Although Clinton did not SLAM Bush, he simply outlined the facts and the failures that accompanied the events. He did it in dispassionate fashion, and did not get personal at all.

Could it be that kidney stones brought down this little emperor? When Karl is bent over, medicated and squealing in pain, the weewee cowboy cannot manage on his own, can he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. And Cheney was hiding, maybe ill too
with Dickie and Rovie out of commission, it's no wonder why * hit the sauce and screwed up the katrina response so blatantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Maybe
Good points. I've never seen it either. Was Poppy Bush this critized by past presidents? I think they definitley (they as in Clinton and Carter) know the inside scoop so perhaps. :shrug: It makes me wonder anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Who is this going to shock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think the shock is only that Carter is saying it
We all know Gore won and have known for a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yes, agreed. Any ex-President, let alone a nice guy like Carter...
... would typically not criticize the current Administration, let alone imply that its illegitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Now THAT is the question... I see nothing shocking about it.
Being in Florida in 2000 and seeing it with my own two peepers, I ain't shocked.

Love Jimmy though, if he's gonna lay a smackdown, I'm all for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. I'm sure there are people who don't know
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. we knew that..
so, that means Bush's first term was illegal, at least. The second term came about from what he did in the first term, that obviously received enough support from his supporters for a 2nd term...or it was stolen, which is plausible as well.

On what grounds is Carter making this decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. "Proceed of a crime"....
... is the best way to characterize the 2004 election. Only his incumbency, with the war, bully pulpit and neverending terror war (Bush's, not Osama's; think continual terror alerts), helped him limp to within range of an election victory.

Without having stolen the first election, he'd have sold the Crawford faux ranch by Spring 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. And until it is covered by MSM it isn't "news" because
the average American will never read this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. NYTimes' Paul Krugman summarized the FL2000 theft a few month ago
That's MSM, but would only be consumed by literate Americans who read that paper or website. Krugman noted that the analysis of the vote came out about a month after 9/11/01--really bad timing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. I think the only way that is going to happen is
if Carter speaks out even more and doesn't care who hears him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. Wow, I wonder if there is something new that will make a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
25. It's about time someone of STATURE told the truth about the 2000 debacle!
Leave it up to Jimmy Carter. :loveya: I can't WAIT to hear this whole story. I wonder what he knows? This should be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Carter loves this country.
Maybe he just couldn't keep his mouth shut any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well it's nice to have a former President confirm what we have all known
I'm sure the MSM will try to make him out to be crazy. Getting up there in age you know. Bless you Mr. Carter. Those of us on this board know you are 1,000 times a better man than the current thief in the White House.

We've all known for almost 5 years now, that the SCOTUS 5-4 vote was the only vote that counted. And for Sandra Day O'Connor, that vote will be her legacy. She participated in the biggest fraud in election history ever.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. No duh! Wait until the MSM "discovers" that they have been had, too.
That is going to be a major laugh fest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
35. I also wanted to know
what can happen now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. so does this mean
that people are now ready to accept the truth of the 2000 election?
(even tho they probably still wont accept the truth of the 2004 selection?) Well to accept even one of them would be a milestone. Maybe acceptance of 2000 will one day lead to acceptance of the possibility of the other...

I wonder if Carter is going to follow up on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's not a shocker. It's the truth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC