Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Matthews shills for Arnold and shuts up yet another woman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:11 PM
Original message
Chris Matthews shills for Arnold and shuts up yet another woman
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 04:18 PM by Karmadillo
Not much of a surprise, but it's always nice to see the scum qualities of media pundits so well analyzed. I excerpted a couple of extra paragraphs since there's a lot of transcript in the first part of the article. Hope that's OK.

http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh100603.shtml

GROPE THIS: How low in character is Washington’s “press corps?” Chris Matthews has long been the low of the low, and he proved it again on last Friday night’s Hardball. That morning, the Los Angeles Times had reported that six women had accused Arnold Schwarzenegger of groping and grabbing, without their consent. Matthews has been the muscleman’s chief shill in the media, so he quickly got to work, standing by his man. But uh-oh! Friday night, trouble was brewing! On Hardball, Gloria Allred expressed concern about the Times report:

ALLRED: What I’m concerned about is what Arnold Schwarzenegger has done, what he has allegedly done to women, to the six women who reported incidents to the L. A. Times. We don’t know if it is true or not, but Mr. Schwarzenegger himself, Chris, said where there’s smoke, there’s fire. He suggested that he acted badly.

MATTHEWS: Right.

ALLRED: He suggested that he apologize. But he didn’t specifically say what he did. We’re not stupid. The Times reported that he grabbed women’s breasts, that he grabbed under their skirt and to their buttocks.


Uh-oh! It didn’t sound good! So Matthews began misdirecting. “By the way, where were you on Clinton?” he asked, specifically mentioning Monica Lewinsky. And soon an obvious distinction was offered. “This is a different situation,” Allred said. “This is unconsented-to conduct.”

Hmmm. Let’s see if we can puzzle this out. Lewinsky engaged in consensual conduct. These six (now fifteen) women say they were groped. The distinction seemed fairly clear to us, but the Hardball host was thoroughly flummoxed. Allred voiced the distinction again. But he just couldn’t figure it out:

ALLRED: The situation with Monica Lewinsky was consented-to conduct. She consented to that conduct. In the newspaper article in the L. A. Times, the situation with the six women with Arnold Schwarzenegger—

MATTHEWS: So it’s OK if it’s—

ALLRED: —is unconsented-to, if you believe it’s true.

MATTHEWS (openly sarcastic): OK. Just to get this straight, just to—Gloria, so your record is straight here. So it’s OK to have consensual relations with a woman who is 30 years or whatever younger than you in the workplace. That’s OK. And it is OK to lie about it. But in this case, he admitted he did it and that’s not OK. What is your value system here?


more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Matthews has a serious problem...
...does his wife know that he thinks sexual battery is ok? How would he feel about the gropinator going for his wifes breasts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. heh...Matthews likely catches hell from his wife.
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 04:23 PM by blm
That's the only good that comes from his pathology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Repubs Don't Believe in Consent, Period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw that show, Matthews was a hot headed abusive
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 04:50 PM by gully
host.

It was obvious he was 'shaken' about the Arnold situation. He would not have said the same words to a man.

MATTHEWS: "Great. OK. My producer is telling me to shut you up. OK?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. A little off topic, but Matthews is such a dork
Have you noticed how dorky he is? He looks like an overgrown kid who's over eager when he gets invited to eat lunch at the jocks' table in the school cafeteria. At least that's what he always made me think of. Maybe that has something to do with Arnold worship, in some kind of twisted way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. he is just like Russert
<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Women, men with daughter's, wives and mothers...they can't be fooled by
the right wing spin, right??

I mean, everybody loves consensual sex, right?

Nobody wants to be the victim of sexual battery, nor do they want someone they love to be the victim of sexual battery, right?

Matthews is being a transparent idiot, right?

And the fact that they're talking about this all day has got to be bad for Arnold, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC