Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Male Veterinarian Appointed Acting Director of Women's Health, FDA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:35 PM
Original message
Male Veterinarian Appointed Acting Director of Women's Health, FDA
Symbolic of the importance the Bush Administration places on women's health, a male veterinarian has been appointed by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Lester Crawford as acting director of the Office of Women's Health. Norris E. Alderson, PhD, has spent the majority of his career at the FDA holding various positions in the Center for Veterinary Medicine.

The Office for Women’s Health, which ensures that the FDA remains gender sensitive and monitors the progress of women’s health initiatives, was most recently headed by Dr. Susan Wood. Wood resigned late last month in protest over the FDA’s refusal to grant over-the-counter status to emergency contraception.

http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=9276

more
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/pp2/portal/files/portal/media/pressreleases/pr-050916-fda.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can this possibly be true?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. I don't think it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. did you look at the links?
unfortunately it looks like it is true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Yes, I did, then went to the FDA site and it has someone else named.
Maybe they changed their minds????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. You must be looking at a different FDA
Because this page, for the Office of Women's Health, definitely lists Toigo as the acting head.

http://www.fda.gov/womens/programs.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
129. agreed
I think the press release from planned parenthood is either a fake, or was premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoflame Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #129
138. I found this ....
I don't think the PP is necessarily wrong.

Found this on US Dept of Health & Human Services
http://www.4woman.gov/owh/dhhs.htm

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Norris Alderson
Acting Director, Office of Women's Health
Associate Commissioner for Science
Food and Drug Administration
Parklawn Building, Room 14C06
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
301-827-3340 phone
301-827-3042 fax
E-mail: [email protected]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. it is true
they love us, like horses and doggies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
146. (1) It is true, and (2) here's Norris Alderson's bio . . .
(1) It is true, and (2) here's Norris Alderson's bio as Alderson submitted it to Sanford Law School for a speaking engagement re Law and Technology, The Bay Area Law School Technology Conference, April 9, 2005, Fair Use in the 21st Century:
.


Norris Alderson, Associate Commissioner for Science, FDA


Norris Alderson received a B.S. in Animal Husbandry from the University of Tennessee and a M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Kentucky. He joined the FDA in 1971 as a reviewer in the Bureau of Veterinary Medicine (BVM). Beginning in 1980, he held a number of management positions in the BVM research organization culminating in the position of Director, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, a position he held from 1988 to 2001. In July 2001, he became Acting Senior Advisor for Science, FDA, and Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Communication, responsible for the Office of Good Clinical Practice, the Counter Terrorism Staff, and the Science Coordination and Communication Staff. In May 2002, he was appointed Senior Associate Commissioner for Science, FDA and Director, Office of Science and Health Coordination. In November 2002, the position title was changed to Associate Commissioner for Science. In this position, his responsibilities include the Office of Orphan Products Development, the Office of Women's Health, the Office of Good Clinical Practice, the Science Coordination Staff, and standards coordination. Dr. Alderson retired from the U.S. Army Reserve in 1997 with the rank of Colonel.

http://slata.stanford.edu/Conference05/speakers.htm


BTW, are you aware that veterinary school is damn tough? And I mean damn tough. Some folks say that veterinary school is HARDER than medical school. Why is that so? Because medical school teaches the anatomy of only one species, i.e., humans, and the medical science thereof. However, veterinary school teaches about the rest of the animals on the planet -- all that memorization!

However, that is not to say that an D.V.M. (doctorate of veterinary medicine) should run, temporary or permanent, the F.D.A. women's sector. No way! It only means that no one should degrade vets, period.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well what's new? Another Bush "gift" to women
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. What to hell are we????
Cattle or dogs???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
75. I guess the administration regards women as mad cows n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #75
77. Randy bitches, maybe?
I sincerely apologize if that comment caused offense, but damn.

Just....... damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. This administration is tone deaf
They just don't care how things APPEAR to the average person. It's all about their power, their cronies....and they fail to see any insult to anyone.

It wouldn't matter if this vet was the best administrator in the world, the idea they project is that women are LESS THAN with this appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #78
119. Just less than?....
The message from W and Karl is that women are nothing more than brood mares....or incubators....I hope those 2 get prostates so big they pop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. OK. How much money has this guy given to the Republicans? Why
are they giving him this job that he is inappropriate to hold?

These dick-heads piss me off to no end.

How dumb of us (me) to think (hope) that the Brownie fiasco might teach them something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. A VETRINARIAN?!?!
:wtf: uh... ... :wtf:?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. My initial response as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
50. The FDA director is a DVM as well
Not sure if it's because most drug research is performed on animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. First of all, it's "veterinarian". If you are going to INSULT us, please
at least do it with correct spelling.

Veterinarians are doctors. We hold a doctoral degree NO DIFFERENT than a physician's. All the slackers go to medical school because there are so many of them and it's so easy to get in. Veterinary school is only for the cream of the crop, because there are so few, and it is HIGHLY competitive. I have, on several occasions in my practice life, had a (male) physician confide in me that he really wanted to become a vet, but couldn't get into vet school. I know of NOT ONE veterinarian who really wanted to be a physician but couldn't get into medical school. So enough with sneering at us lowly, stupid veterinarians, ok?

Physicians are only trained in human medicine. We vets know how to take care of all the other species on the planet. Who do you think knows more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
62. I don't think the WTF means
that vets are inferior to MDs. I think the point is WTF does a vet know about (human) women's health issues? And I think the answer is less than, say, a gynocologist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. A vet knows about EVERYBODY ELSE'S gynecological issues.
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 11:57 PM by kestrel91316
It's not very difficult to add one more species to the internal database in a vet's head.

These folks are researchers and this is an administrative position. They don't have to be a practicing gynecologist, for pete's sake. They just have to have comprehensive midical knowledge and the ability to learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #65
83. Terrific.
All of us humans should start going to the vets for treatment. No offense, but you won't even be allowed to treat humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #52
68. That's good to know
The next time I need to take my dog to the vet,I'll make an appointment for myself too. (We are both bitches) so we can both get a pap smear and a mammogram together. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #68
72. You laugh. People are forever asking me about how to deal with their
own minor medical problems, especially skin stuff. And I had a total stranger come in one day and ask me to take a skin stitch out of his head leftover from 5 years before, that he was starting to be annoyed by!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. Oh, that is too funny!
But you gotta agree, one-stop medical care!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #52
100. No offense to veterinarians... but you are not trained in women's health.
I agree that you are schooled in all species, but a women's health director should actually have experience IN the realm of women's health issues. Have you prescribed birth control to human females? Have you attended lots of conferences and extended training in human female health issues as a professional? I know from my neighbor, who is a pediatrician, that those who couldnt' get into vet school went into human medicine. Your profession is a demanding one. But.. the point is that the director of women's health should have experience in that field. Just as I would not want a position dealing with the health of my pets to be a gynocologist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
104. Sorry for not spell checking
:eyes: I just think that a women's health specialist should be placed in this position. I realize how difficult it is to complete a vetrinary degree. I know several people who have tried - and failed.
But a veterinarian should NOT be in this position, even if their knowledge is interdisciplinary they are NOT specialists in women's health. Frankly I feel that someone who has spent a career working with animals (no matter what their education) is not qualified for a position like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
113. So basically... vets RULE and physicians DROOL? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thtwudbeme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
118. "We vets know how to take care of all the other species on the planet."
Sounds like you flunked zoolology, and possibly biology 101.

better get back to school fast, friend!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
121. You are insulted??????????
Maybe you need to work on your 'bedside manner' a bit when treating your female patients....geez.

Get some empathy and stop the self-absorption for a second, ok?

At least it would have been nice to have a female vet appointed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MockSwede Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #52
142. Hear, Hear!
I'd rather hang out with the vet's clientele, anyway. Not a bunch of Yahoos - and look up the first use of that with Jonathan Swift and "Gulliver's Travels". It's the 'animals' that are humane.

You can sheep dip me anytime.

Just keep that Burdizzo away from me, I'm already fixed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
152. ROFLMAO!
I don't mean to laugh at your expense, but I have this image of taking my Chow to the vet so both of us can get our pap smears at the same time.

"Ms. Butterfly, everything is normal, except you seem to have fewer than the usual number of teats,"

Vets study hard and perform an invaluable service. But I didn't take my Chow to the Ob-Gyn to get spayed and I'm not going to her vet for my annual exam. The two specialities are really very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. shows you what they think of us -- bitches!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Take that....bitches. God the nerve of these guys. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. ok, my thread doesn't seem to far out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minimus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. bush's followers are sheep but this is crosses the line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
53. See my above post (this vet is on the warpath).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. nice, really nice...
can't make this stuff up can you? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. What? Concerned Laura isn't "helping" women in the US
by "influencing" her idiot husband? Gee, what a surprise.

Women need medical treatment? Nah, any healthy woman can give birth in a field and get up and start plowing again. They die? Get another.
This "friday newsdump" is meant to be an insult---sure, they will laugh and say "its temporary, its administrative" but what it really is is exactly what it looks like: Women, you are no better than livestock in the scheme of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. And just let some patriarchal fundy sob say the word submissive
in my hearing... :nuke: :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
88. Livestock - the key word regarding the position of women in patriarchies.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is this the same guy who recommends certain Bible verses
for PMS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. no, that was the last insult---ya gotta keep up
this is the latest

Prayer and the same treatment you'd give a cow. That's all women need. They are expendable. That's what the Bush clan believes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
54. No, dear, the insult is how you people are denigrating my profession.
See my above post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #54
111. Your profession is to treat animals.
I know that vets are trained in general medical knowledge. But you are NOT an expert in women's health. No physician is besides OB/GYN's. That's why there are medical *specialties*. Yours is for animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #111
125. Vets...unless they specialize and become board certified...also do not
do internships or residencies.

This poster is making some fairly ridiculous claims to human medical knowledge, and should seriously consider her position on this matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callisto Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #111
132. Even OB GYN's are not the best unless board certified!
Geez- I love my vet and I know my Vet is super educated and can care for like 500 different systems....I think that is fantastic. No offense to any Veterinarian..BUT I don't think any Vet would want another Vet to do open heart surgery on their newborn infant either- much less have the pres appoint one to do so. Holy crap is this true?The link isn't working..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #54
123. you're self-absorption and ego are absolutely
mind boggling.....why don't you go 'talk to the animals' and leave us women/brood mares to our own health care. Un-f*cking-believable.....All women are insulted and this poster is on the warpath...

As a woman, don't you see the slap by the admin? Come on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Kerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
126. you mean they don't help??
This seems as great an idea as teaching intelling design. Did you hear of MS in Intelligent Design at Bob Jones University? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for posting this, Rose Siding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well what do you expect from a guy that appointed
an ex Horse Show judge as head of FEMA?

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I'd like to think he would learn from his mistake.
Does he ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. How can he, when he hasn't made any mistakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Blockheads rarely do
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 09:56 PM by maine_raptor
Also doing the same thing over and over is the definition of insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
110. Actually, that's a definition of OCD.
It's doing something over and over and expecting different results that is a definition of insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
147. No, George Walker Bush does not -- never -- make mistakes . . .
How can he? After all, George Walker Bush talks to God. How can God be wrong? Eh.


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh yes, this is just perfect! Nothing more need be said! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. OMFG-- this is surreal....
You really can't make this shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Theresa A. Toigo Is Appointed Acting Director of FDA's Office of Women's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. It states that it's a revision from earlier
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 09:53 PM by Solly Mack
Maybe they had it incorrect earlier and now it's correct?

from the FDA link

"This is a revision of this statement posted earlier on September 16."

Thank you!


on edit: from Google http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=+Norris+E.+Alderson&btnG=Google+Search

-however, when you click the link, the page no longer exist. So I think it said one thing earlier and it's now changed.

Office ofWomen's Health--Norris E. Alderson
Office of Women's Health--Norris Alderson acting director.
origin.www.fda.gov/womens/alderson.html - 5k - 15 Sep 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. Also from the FDA site-
On the cached page, he's called the acting head of women's health:

Dr. Norris Alderson--Acting Director of FDA's Office of Women's Health
Norris E. Alderson, PhD
Associate Commissioner for Science
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Alderson began his career in FDA in 1971 following graduate and post-doctoral work at the University of Kentucky. The majority of his FDA career has been in the Center for Veterinary Medicine, holding a number of management positions, culminating in the position of Director, Office of Research. In 2001, he became Acting Senior Advisor for Science, and Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Communication. In 2002, he was appointed Senior Associate Commissioner for Science, and Director, Office of Science and Health Coordination. The title was later changed to Associate Commissioner for Science. In his current position, he is responsible for coordination of science issues across the agency, the Office of Womenís Health, Office of Orphan Products Development, the Good Clinical Practices Staff, and standards coordination.

http://google.fda.gov/search?q=cache:iX-NlZS4-n8:http://www.fda.gov/womens/alderson.html+Norris+Alderson&restrict=&site=FDA&output=xml_no_dtd&client=FDA&access=p&lr=&proxystylesheet=FDA&oe=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Guess they don't need another Brownie repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
51. " Orphan Products Development".. Robert's latin american children?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
61. that's what i'm noticing too--the link not available & the cached
link showing this guy. what they heck are they up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #39
70. www.fda.gov's home page has this.....
FDA NEWS
Toigo Named Acting Head of Women's Health Office

FDA Releases Results of Study on Defibrillator and Pacemaker Malfunctions

Good Manufacturing Practices Rule for Radioactive PET Drugs Proposed

<snip>

You can click on the click for the article about her appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. We need to make sure the media is fully aware of this and reports it to
everyone.

Tie it to Brownie - the Bush Administration has learned NOTHING from Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm not yelling yet (read this already in LBN)
I'm surprisingly calm...I just knew I'd be yelling once my lower jaw re-joined the rest of my face.

Perhaps I'm still stunned.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. We're so numb after these past 4+ years, stunned is all we can manage
At times, that is. There are other times when I go full-out b*tshit crazy around the house. And I'm fine with that. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. Robert Blake appointed as Assistant Director.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. that'll come in handy when i go into heat!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bush Answer To Affordable Healthcare!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. So females are just a bunch of BITCHES -- regardless of the species?
From day one the bushie bunch has had zero respect for women -- war on women was started day one of the bushie reign.

Now the bastard has made it official.

BITCHES of the world -- unite.

Katrina is a bitch who is going to take bushie down. His legacy? He is ****ing mother nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyJones Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. LMAO!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. Please stop with the insulting of veterinarians. I happen to know a whole
lot more about human health (hell, humans are just one MORE species; what's the big deal) than the average overspecialized physician. Some of the most ignorant, misinformed clients I have in my practice are the PHYSICIANS. If you were marooned on a desert island, trust me, you would want a vet with you any day of the week before you would want the average physician. We spend our days in the trenches, making do with guesswork half the time. We HAVE to be better than them. Any fool can diagnose and treat with enough technology and insurance money.

Done ranting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. he is a MALE -- with zero specialty in WOMAN'S health issues
and you are correct about your assessment of many "Physicians" -- many have no idea of how to LISTEN or even treat women.


And I've found that female Veterinarians are better at diagnosing bitches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. A female physician (ob/gyn) would obviously be best for the post. But
there is no need to insult veterinarians. We are on average WAY smarter than physicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Most are -- but I go by my pet's opinion -- if they hate a VET
I go shopping for another one that they trust and like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #66
79. Sending a shout of support to Kestrel
Before her head explodes. :loveya:

-Cindy in Fort Lauderdale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #66
134. actually I agree with you
My veterianarian is far better than the doctor I go to. It's even in my medical record that I would not take my own dog to a certain doctor. They have it down as a "lack of confidence" rather than my concise statement. Enough said on that I suppose! :argh:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
115. If they would have named an ear/nose/throat specialist
to be the director of, I dunno, let's say dermatology, there would be mocking then too. It wouldn't be to degrade the validity of e/n/t specialists, it would be to point out that the person was NOT very qualified for that high ranking position. In this particular case, I'm sure you have to understand that it's even more preposterous than my lame analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. Looks like Norris E. Alderson was let go before he started
seems like someone looked and said OOPS! This is really too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. OMG!!!!!
My head is about to explode from all the insanity coming from the idiot in thief. Is ANYONE going to stop him,or are we doomed to living in bu$h's insane asylum for another 3 damn years? When are we,the people going to pull together and rid this country of this cancer on society? "Male Veterinarian Appointed Acting Director of Women's Health, FDA"????? For Khrist's sake what is WRONG with the Democrats that they keep looking the other way while this incompetent bag of steaming shit is trying to KILL US ALL???? You know,I am so tired of being angry all the time,I am so tired of being upset,I am so tired of always having to rant everytime I post in a thread,but how in the hell can a person keep from it when you read what that fake SOB is doing next? I think I'm going to have to go to anger management classes....I can't take this shit anymore. :grr: :argh:
:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
124. I'm right there with you, buff2...
My shoulders are constantly up around my ears...I feel as if I could spit nails...If you find a good class, let me know.

Maybe taking up target practice or boxing would help????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GraysonDave Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
35. That's like something out of The Onion
Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkat65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Does this mean I get to bite my OBY-GYN if I don't like they way, oh
forget it!
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
76. Heh, heh
That was actually very clever!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #37
82. It means you will be getting the best possible
flea and tick treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. Absolutely, positively...
fucking outrageous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am suffering from outrage fatigue, but this one fucking pisses me off!
It's loooooong past pitchfork and torch time..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
43. The last one I believed WAS an onion bit.
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 10:37 PM by snot
But this is REAL???

Someone needs to do a quiz for publication like in Shouts and Murmers or something--multiple choice, guess which item the * administration DIDn't do. I'm sure one could come up with at least a dozen questions, meaning 3 doz. ridiculous things the * administration DID do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. This is surreal...
I am hoping to wake up and realize this was all a bad dream and it's 2000 and Al Gore is president.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
45. OMFG
I have no words..


I don't have fleas goddammit..

I want to hit something right now, very hard.

I just sent this to Malloy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
47. Just thinkig about all the COWS..eerr Women out there....n/t
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 11:05 PM by banana republican
on edit:

My wife will kill me if she finds out I posted this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
63. moo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
48.  I am speechless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
56. I am, seriously, very OFFENDED by this.
:mad:

This is total bullshit and it speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
57. "Sir, give this woman a fleabath!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. Who could make this shit up?


Help. Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. When physicians were in charge of the FDA for years and
therefore in charge of veterinary public health, nobody thought that was strange. Now that a veterinarian (remember, WE VETS are the best and brightest) is in charge of the FDA everybody is having a hissy fit. This is just ignorant BS.

A research veterinarian is way better qualified to expand into the human field than a physician is to expand into the animal field. The physicians I know cannot seem to get into their tiny little brains that animals are not just small, furry people. We vets know that every species is different from every other species, sometimes in big ways, sometime small. That's why they are different species. Duh.

In other words, their minds are closed. Ours are open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarleenMB Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #59
69. not the same
Sorry kestrel9131 but I completely disagree with you that Veterinarians are "the same as" physicians. You hold a PhD in Vet medicine while physicians hold a Doctor of Medicine (or whatever the hell M.D. stands for).

don't get me wrong ... I worship the ground our Vet walks on. He is the kindest, most caring man and I trust him completely. With my pets. My own body is another story. I am not a horse, or a cow, or a ewe, a camel, a llama ... I walk on two legs. thank you very much.

Physicians (much as I HATE the medical community these days) have been trained to deal with human anatomy.

Vets are trained to work on the 4 legged variety which IS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT because our fur babies don't speak english. But that does not mean I'm happy that a VET is now in charge of women's health issues. Sorry. I DON'T LIKE IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. Dead wrong. I am not sure what planet you live on, but here on earth
in the good old US of A we veterinarians receive the degree: Doctor of Veterinary Medicine. It is not a PhD. It is a MEDICAL DEGREE. I have very proudly right now managed to refrain from calling you a *******.

University of Michigan vets get a VMD (Veterinary Medical Doctor) degree. Same difference. WE ARE DOCTORS. YOU ARE IN ERROR.

We are not physicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #73
84. I don't care what training you have
I prefer an MD who treats human mammals. For this 'management' position, some expertise in HUMAN female health care would seem to be a requirement.

No one is knocking vets. We just prefer to receive our health care from a doctor whose patients are just like us and not the 4 legged variety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #84
93. So this person at the FDA is personally providing your health care?????
This person, regardless of gender and specifics of medical training, is a BUREAUCRAT and not in private practice.

Researchers and bureaucrats merge and mingle their areas of interest and expertise in the real world.

Plenty of people on DU knock vets. With considerable regularity, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #93
117. They knock teachers too
So join the club.

There are also a lot more here who are supportive of my profession. I would suspect the same is true of yours.

Quit being so sensitive. Just stop and think about this for a minute. I am a woman and the thought of a vet in charge of my health care is offensive to me. Not because a vet is less capable than an OB/GYN, but because it is a VET and not an OB/GYN. It would be like putting me, an elementary teacher, in charge of a college physics program.

Your argument also holds no water. Mike Brown was also a bureaucrat and look at what happened to FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarleenMB Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #73
85. get a grip
For crying out loud. You react to my post as if I called you (and all other vets) mindless morans. Did you miss the compliments??? So I called it wrong. BFD. You are an ANIMAL doctor and I still would not go to you or any other vet for my own health care. YOU DO NOT HAVE THE TRAINING.

Take a pill and call me in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #85
95. See post above. This is in reference to a BUREAUCRAT and researcher,
NOT YOUR PERSONAL PHYSICIAN.

Your personal medical care is, and should of course be, in the hands of a PHYSICIAN.

My personal preference is that the post be filled by an ob/gyn type research physician. But a veterinarian with years of experience in research/industry/government RATHER THAN PRIVATE PRACTICE could easily have the qualifications for the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #95
106. This BUREAUCRAT is in charge of WOMEN'S HEALTH
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 12:26 PM by jono
While I don't disagree that veterinarians can be every bit as qualified for bureaucratic positions - provided they have the experience in research/industry/government - the point is that this isn't just any office in the FDA.

I think a veterinarian could be qualified to lead, for example, the Office of Planning, or the Office of the Ombudsman, or even to head the FDA overall.

But the Office of Women's Health?



That's clearly just a big FU, destined to elicit a justifiably loud reaction. I love our family vet, but the OWH is a specialized office within FDA that deals with an area of medicine that is outside a vet's general areas of expertise. And let's not forget, this wasn't just any veterinarian we're talking about - this was a MALE veterinarian.

Vets are certainly qualified for these types of jobs, but probably not the best fit for this particular job. A Toigo appointment is clearly, at least at face value, far less controversial.

edit: and I agree with mac56 below that the larger issue is the cronyism that would even lead to such an appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #106
150. Toigo is "less controversial"? Why? She's a BPharm!
She's not any sort of physician--she's a chemist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #95
135. I agree with you about having the qualifications for the job. However,...
it just feels like another slap in the face from this administration to me. Honestly, I probably wouldn't be nearly as upset if this had been done during the Clinton Administration because I feel as though I could trust it to use science to make its decisions. Because I trust nothing that the B* Administration does, I see it as yet another example of a lack of respect for me as a woman.

I understand that I'm not being consistent, but it's an emotional reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarleenMB Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #73
87. and one last thing
I graduated from Colorado State University which has one of the finest Vet Med programs in the country. I do NOT recall VM students having to endure 4 years of residency in a (human) hospital nor was I aware they were required to take human physiology or any other courses related to human medicine.

4 years to a BS

4 years to a Vet Med degree

go practice.

Did I get THAT wrong.

Now. Could you come down off your high horse and act like the caring Vet I'm sure you must be and stop with the vitriol? You are a member of a well respected profession. No one doubts that or even called it into question.

The POINT is, as a HUMAN WOMAN, I do not want a MAN or a VETERINARIAN calling the shots for my health care. I think I have the right to voice that opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #87
97. When did I say you couldn't express your opinion?
That's right. I DIDN'T.

My complaint here is the level of vitriol against MY PROFESSION, which is every bit as respectable as human medicine, and probably more so.

Get your personal medical care from a physician. But DO NOT PRESUME to exclude other medical professionals from this position in government. Where were you folks when the HEAD OF THE FDA was appointed? He's a vet, too. Is he completely unqualified? I find the comparison in this thread to Michael Brown to be especially insulting, unwarranted, and completely ignorant. I expect better of DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. I think we're all missing the point here.
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 12:06 PM by mac56
Bush and his cronies didn't appoint this guy to head Women's Health at the FDA because of his knowledge of health care.

They did it out of insensitivity, laziness, and cronyism. The way they appointed a horse show judge to head FEMA.

I think we've gone off on a tangent here that misses the whole point of why this is an outrage.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #87
151. "I do not want a MAN or a VETERINARIAN calling the shots"
But a female pharmacist is okay? A pharm is a chemist, which is a good bit further away from MD than a VMD is. Pharms generally have a BS or BPharm degree that they get with 4 or 5 years of undergrad study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #73
116. A doctor of VETERINARY medicine.
I don't want a dermatologist performing open heart surgery on me, and I don't want a veterinarian giving me a pap smear. All are doctors, but are trained in different specialties (and species, for that matter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #59
90. I have to agree with your
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 09:22 AM by FlaGranny
defense of veterinarians. I have heard for many years that it is harder to get into veterinary school than medical school. Many physicians are not as knowledgable because they have specialized in one body part or another. They do have it easier because most of their patient's CAN tell them what is wrong (pediatricians, neurologists, and gerontologists sometimes excluded).

I know this about veterinarians, but I was still amazed that the Bush administration appointed a male veterinarian to oversee human female health. The reason I am amazed they did it is because of the predictable reaction - you've seen it right here. As a woman, it makes me feel that they think we are no better than animals. Then, again, we (male and female) are no better than animals. We ARE animals. Oh well, what can I say?

Edit: I STILL would go to my physician rather than a veterinarian, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #90
145. My OB/GYN wanted to be a vet originally but couldn't get into vet
school so he settled for being an OB.

Just the same, I wouldn't want a vet doing my assessment, or my OB taking care of my animals.

There is no need for anyone to smear vets here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
94. Who do you go to for your medical care?
A vet or a doctor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
140. For your information - YOU are making Vets sound like idiots
with your idiotic ranting.

People don't have anything against vets. As long as vets can acknowledge what they are trained for and don't expect to be experts on women's health when they are not.

I could argue that I as a woman artist could make better decisions on women's health than anyone that Bush has in there - but that is really beside the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
60. I would much rather
have my dog's Vet as my attending physician than the out of touch arrogant asshole I have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
71. Doesn't take long for things to get out of control around here.
See post #18


Theresa A. Toigo Is Appointed Acting Director of FDA's Office of Women's
Health

link...

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2005/toigoOWH.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #71
136. Theresa A. Toigo is the Acting Director of FDA's Office of Women's
Health. Cool, lets look at this again.

from FDA website
<snip>
Ms. Toigo received her pharmacy (BS) and business (MBA) degrees from Rutgers University.
<end of snip>

Um, Um the Pharmacist I know went to school for six years and have a wonderful knowledge of drugs. The MBA Degree goes without saying. In conclusion, this sounds corporate to me. Um, just thin-kin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
80. Edit: Delete
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 03:04 AM by impeachdubya
Guess its not true. Sure sounds like it should be, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
81. I do some work for a battered women's shelter . . .
when our director hears about this, she's going to go batshit . . . as will anyone concerned with women and gender equality . . . absolutely infuriating . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
86. Important: FDA changed its mind
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 09:02 AM by MaineDem
* A few hours after the Food and Drug Administration posted on its Web site an announcement naming Dr. Norris E. Alderson, an expert in animal science, acting director of the Office of Women’s Health, the posting was replaced with an announcement naming Theresa A. Toigo to the post. The new new director is a career employee with a strong backgound in cancer and HIV/AIDS.


http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2454/context/outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #86
89. Thanks for the update! Sometimes even the feds can show a
glimmer of sanity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #86
91. Well, geez, I guess they DID have qualified person for the job.
Unbelievable that a male veterinarian would even be CONSIDERED for this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #91
153. Why would a pharmacist be more qualified than a vet? They're chemists(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #86
98. I just now saw this post
Thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #86
105. Close, but still not enough.
Why not just appoint an actual OB/GYN, for crissake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #86
109. Thank goodness. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #86
131. Now they fire 'em before they even START. Good job, Drownie!
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatelseisnew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
92. This site hasnt been updated yet
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 10:02 AM by whatelseisnew
http://www.4woman.gov/owh/dhhs.htm

Membership of the HHS Coordinating Committee on Women's Health

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Norris Alderson
Acting Director, Office of Women's Health
Associate Commissioner for Science
Food and Drug Administration
Parklawn Building, Room 14C06
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
301-827-3340 phone
301-827-3042 fax
E-mail: [email protected]
...
Current as of September 2005

(spell edit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
96. They can't be serious
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 10:23 AM by Lone_Star_Dem
I'd like to know what this man knows about:

The difference in women's and men's heart health.

The pros and cons of hormone replacement therapy.

Bone loss issues in relation to women's health; the benefits of soy for said issues.

Ovarian cancer.

Cervical cancer.

Breast cancer.

Alcohol use in relation women's health.

Genetics in relation to women's health.

Autoimmune diseases in relation to women's health.

Depression during and after pregnancy.

Minority women's health issues.

Mammograms

Fibromyalgia

Lupus

Birth control Methods in relation to women's health.

Uterine cancer.

Migraine headaches.

Premenstrual Syndrome.


These are just a few (off the top of my head) of the issues surrounding womens health that this man is not qualified to address.

I am not an animal and, with all due respect to veterinarians, I don't want a veterinarian dealing with my complicated health issues.

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
99. When I see I have seen it all...they keep
proving me wrong. Is there a genetic problem with these people's common sense? Oh, forget, they were born w/o conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
101. After Brownie's shameful romp in FEMA, I would have expected more from 'em
You know, we could always MEDIA BLITZ this, point out the cronyism and disregard for women inherent in this appointment. We could burn this appointment to the ground if we wanted. I know there are greater issues to deal with, but it would be so easy to kill this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
102. you've got to admit, * surely knows how to send a message...
btw, i love veterinarians and animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
107. That position should be held by a woman. Duh!!
I have to say, though, that it might be a good thing for * et al to listen to a veterinarian's point of view on reproductive rights for women. I've never had a vet tell me that instead of spaying or neutering my pets I should leave the decision up to God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
108. this will come in handy...
when I have my next litter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
112. Whatever else, I doubt he's a vet--vets are DVM or VMD, not PhD
Or at least I've never heard of a vet whose medical credential is PhD.

He's more likely to be a biologist.

Not that that makes it better. If I were in dire need of med care, I'd sooner be treated by a DVM than a PhD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #112
148. Many vets have 4 degrees: BS, DVM, Masters & PhD in Veterinary Medicine.
These degrees are required in order to obtain a postion as a research professor or scientist.

My good friend just retired from a 35 year tenured position as a Medical Microbiology/Immunology professor at a veterinary medicine school at a major US public university.

Many Infectious Disease research vets work for Universities, the CDC, the armed services and the NIH on projects studying infectious disease, vaccine development and production. Many "people" vaccines are produced from serum from immunized horses. Horses are large animals which can produce huge quantities of serum.

He obtained a bachelor in animal science, a DVM at second university and both a masters and a PhD in Veterinary Medicine at a third major research university. Veterinary Professors and veterinary researchers hold PhD in their particular areas of study. For instance: infectious diseases (medical microbiology, parasitology, and immunology) and animal behavior among many other fields.

Veterinary Medicine Schools offer many degree programs in addition to the well-known DVM programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #148
149. Yes, the same is true of MDs and DDSs. But typically when someone has
both professional and academic doctorates, it's the professional one that'll be cited. So when someone has an academic doc cited, I take it as read that they're a researcher and not qualified for clinical practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
114. What's the problem? He's Barbara Bush's personal physician after all
Once Mister Ed moved into the White House stables, he taught him NOT to talk. A truly gifted doctor. Everybody's just jealous.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
120. This is carrying the pussy thing just way too far....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. Ewwww
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Kerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
127. give the guy a break..
all the OB/GYN's are out there practicing their love of American women.. According to our illustrious Commander-in-thief anyway. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
128. Go to the FDA web site
There's a press release from 9/16 saying that they have appointed Theresa Toigo acting director.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callisto Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #128
133. Ok no more screwing then
Is she a MD or is she a gardener or a horse trainer or what?

I'm sick of guys telling me what to do with my damned body- no more fucking ever!Give me a hot and sexy progressive male that's taller than me - smart, funny and won't tell me what to do with my body!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
130. Moooooooo! Baaaaaaa! Oink Oink!!
Cluck Cluck...Ruff Ruff. Sorry, I was just practicing! And BTW, why was this not in the mainstream media?? Close your legs and never open them again? I do not know what to tell my daughters anymore. I would almost be happier if they became lesbians and then I would not have to worry. Fuck men who think they are in charge of our bodies. They should not even be able to vote on this issue. We should not let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
137. Try here for a government link
Confirming the above:

http://www.4woman.gov/owh/dhhs.htm

scroll down for:

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Dr. Norris Alderson
Acting Director, Office of Women's Health
Associate Commissioner for Science
Food and Drug Administration
Parklawn Building, Room 14C06
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, MD 20857
301-827-3340 phone
301-827-3042 fax
E-mail: [email protected]

Perhaps the FDA changed its mind, but some of the evidence remains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoflame Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
139. Here's an update from Solon
The Bush administration's love affair with animals

We're not saying there's a connection here, but we're not saying there isn't, either.

Remember how George W. Bush selected as his FEMA director a man whose last job involved judging horse shows for the International Arabian Horse Association? Well, the president's Food and Drug Administration commissioner has appointed an acting director for the Office of Women's Health, and he's a man -- a man! -- who has spent much of his career working in the field of veterinary medicine.

The FDA had an opening to fill in the Office of Women's Health because its last director, Susan Wood, quit in protest over the agency's dithering and delays on the morning-after pill. Wood's acting replacement is Norris Alderson. Alderson has a bachelor's degree in animal husbandry from the University of Tennessee and graduate degrees from the University of Kentucky. He has worked at the FDA for more than 30 years, more than 20 of which he spent in the agency's Bureau of Veterinary Medicine.

Karen Pearl, the interim president of Planned Parenthood, said that Alderson's appointment "speaks volumes about the priority the Bush administration places on women's health and safety."

It does, all right, and not just in the language that Doctor Doolittle understands.

Update: Shortly after we posted this item, which was based on a press release from Planned Parenthood, a reader alerted us to a press release that was posted today on the FDA's Web site. In that release, the FDA said that Theresa A. Toigo has been appointed as the acting director of the Office of Women's Health. The FDA press release also says, rather cryptically, "This is a revision of this statement posted earlier on September 16." That earlier statement is no longer available on the FDA's site, but, as another reader pointed out, a cached version is still available through Google. Under the heading, "Dr. Norris Alderson -- Acting Director of FDA's Office of Women's Health," Alderson's bio says, "The majority of his FDA career has been in the Center for Veterinary Medicine, holding a number of management positions, culminating in the position of Director, Office of Research." Did the FDA scramble to change acting directors once it realized that Alderson's appointment might invite unhappy comparisons to Michael Brown's tenure at FEMA? Inquiring minds want to know, and are still waiting for calls back to find out.

Permalink <15:30 EDT, Sept. 16, 2005>

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/09/16/animals/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
141. self delete
Edited on Sun Sep-18-05 04:07 PM by OregonBlue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
143. Great point RoseSiding...why does *co hate women?
This made me think,

"Wait a minute, auto, they just got screwed for appointing a horse association executive as FEMA director. Why would they do something as stupid as this a few days after they fired the guy?"

hmmm...thinking...thinking...thinking...GOT IT!

They don't care becasue they don't have to.
They are guaranteed to win every election and retain power as long as they like.
They control to voting and vote counting process (80% of votes tabulated/counted by right wing Republican firms)...
...but, oh, can't say that, it means I'm a "conspniracy" theorist.

Well, this behavior and those facts are no "coincidence" and if anyone thinks the "tin ear" and the public pilferage is stupidity, think again or proclaim your faith in "coincidence."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
144. Our state abolished the entire department
Women's health now ranks waaaaay behind the pets and livestock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC