LA Times suck

[brettdale]

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-083005bush_lat,0,3219613.story?coll=la-tot-promo&track=morenews

CORONADO, Calif. -- Nearing the end of a vacation month dominated by antiwar protests outside his Texas home, a rising death toll in Iraq and sagging poll numbers, President Bush today invoked the anniversary of the Japanese surrender in World War II and the postwar rebirth of that country as a historic parallel to present-day U.S. efforts in the Middle East.

[Initech]

1. Bush is a dumbass

There's a HUGE difference between WWII and the Iraq War - WWII ended.

[Nightjock]

2. What a complete idiot!

He's grasping at any straws he can. It's pathetic and more people see it everyday.

[Richardo]

3. So why does the Times suck?

For reporting the news in the news section? I'm sure they'll call him a lying dumbass in the Op/Ed section.

Catch THIS 'graph:

Bush sought to connect the debate over Iraq's newly drafted constitution — a process that has flummoxed Bush and other U.S. officials who tried unsuccessfully to coax Sunni leaders to support the document and avoid what some critics now say is a recipe for civil war — to the reconstruction led by the Allies 60 years ago.


Now THAT's what I call liberal bias! "Flummoxed", "unsuccessfully", "recipe for civil war" - they're not exactly letting him get away with anything. :D

[brettdale]

4. I didnt like

The comments on Cindy Sheehan, "well funded liberal groups"

[Richardo]

5. Well then that's the excerpt you should have put in your post.

You made it look like you didn't like the Bush "Iraq=WWII" coverage.