Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Briefing: Why President Embraces 9/11, Shuns Sheehan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:51 PM
Original message
White House Briefing: Why President Embraces 9/11, Shuns Sheehan

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001021931

White House Briefing: Why President Embraces 9/11, Shuns Sheehan

NEW YORK Responding this week to growing public unrest about Iraq, and declining personal approval ratings, President Bush, in several public appearances, has revived an earlier strategy of linking the current war tightly to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2002. Today, a White House spokesman went even further, responding to the inevitable press questioning about the president's view of war protestor Cindy Sheehan, who has returned to Texas, by focusing on 9/11.

The spokesman, Trent Duffy, at a press briefing in Texas, also refused to be pinned down on whether the president had decided to rule out meeting with Sheehan again. And he said the president wasn't worried about the Iraqis putting off a vote on their new constitution because they are continuing to "work very hard" on it, and look how long it took America to finish its own constitution.

Here is much of the transcript:

***
Q Does the President feel that over the last couple of days he's made an effective and convincing case that Cindy Sheehan is misguided in her feelings about the war and what should happen to the troops?

MR. DUFFY: Well, first of all, the President has spoken continuously about the way he approaches this war, following September 11th, 2001. On September 14th, 2001, he stood at the National Cathedral and told all of America that this was going to be a very long and difficult war, and that there were going to be some very trying moments; but that because of what happened on 9/11, that we had to view the world in a different way.


many more treasures @ link..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11
blah blah blah BLAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The war he was referring to at that time was the one against Al-Qaeda
in Afghanistan.. He didn't mention that he was going to throw into the mix an unrelated country with whom his family has a personal beef .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. he didn't mention it to us... but it was there all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. what war was Jr. talking about on Sept 14, 2001 the war on terror?


On September 14th, 2001, he stood at the National Cathedral and told all of America that this was going to be a very long and difficult war,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah it was real hard work
for ole Bush to hide out for three days while America carried on in his absence. Even Clinton was at Ground Zero during 9/11!

Bush? Hiding in his cubby hole somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Invade Brazil. Or, as it's known in Brazil, Brasil.
I mean, they don't even know how to spell the name of their own country. And, when we invade, no doubt thousands of Brazilians will resist. Therefore, Brazil is harboring thousands of terrorists, who would threaten us if we invaded them. So we have no choice but to invade NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC