Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton Getting Fund Raiser Money From Videogame Industry ?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:56 PM
Original message
Hillary Clinton Getting Fund Raiser Money From Videogame Industry ?!
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 02:11 PM by InfoMinister
Check out this article. After putting down the videogame industry she is now accepting money from them.

http://www.livejournal.com/users/gamepolitics/63661.html

Ugh, I hope there are some actual viable Democratic candidates for '08 because Hillary is too inconsistent even with her own views whether I agreed with those views or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unfortunately, you hit on something here.
My son is very interested in the video-game industry and he may only have a peripheral idea of politics, but his group assailed Hillary for her latest campaign against the industry. From a young techi's point of view, it's near impossible for the average person to get into the hidden pages of programming. So it's much ado about nothing, in his opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh, She's Going To Play Nice Now
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 02:09 PM by InfoMinister
Since they're going to give her all of that money. This is exactly what other companies are doing. Even those companies that are actually doing harm to other people (environmental pollution, etc.).

Even Hollywood gives politicians about 48 million dollars a year in campaign contributions. You don't see very many politicians going after Hollywood very often do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why have hidden pages?
Indeed clean-up when I coded removed comments and crap that was commented out and sure as hell never left in active code that just needed a patch to go live - at least not by accident,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doug Lowenstein fund raiser is now an "Industry sponsored" fundraiser?
Amazing.

Hill will need a thick skin to survive the arrows of the pretend left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The pretend Left?
That's rich.

You mean, like her? She just couldn't distance herself fast enough from the real thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hill pushed single payer National Health in 93 when the "left" was into
compromise to get it passed without insurance company objection mode.

She is the real thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Please
NOT single payer.

More like giveaway to the Insurance interests. After all, she lives in the "real world".

Yeah, she's a real bonus for us. I can see the Corp media gunning for her--because either way they win, but, more likely they are setting her up as an albatross around our neck--just like Kerry was---BECAUSE they are so beholden to power brokers and insiders they are paralyzed.

Yeah, Clinton, like Kerry can really address the concerns of the Nation when it comes to the Iraq disaster, can't she? Yeah, she can really grab the bull by the horns on that one.

Face it, she is a compromised candidate with enormous liabilities when it comes to facing the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Nope - Hill pushed single payer - the Insurance Industry groups
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 02:51 PM by papau
(of which I was a part) tracked her influence and pushed Bill to ignore Hillary and concentrate on the "doable" - all the while we were filming "Louise" and her "questions" for the PR fight.

I was on the life, tax, and international side at the time, but the health reports were weekly and very informative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh well, taking money is "moral". Bwaaahaaaahaaaaaa.
Looks like she mighta tripped on her journey to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't know but in my eyes it shows that she plays no
favoritism to industries just because they gave her money...

Isn't that why we hate the special interests? Because then the candidate "owes" a favor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This Recently Happened
I can't recall the videogame industry actually doing this for any other candidate. It looks to me like this is a reaction from the videogame industry to get her to shut up about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. well, I'm willing to wait and see what comes of it
her going after them was pretty much censorship. I agree that parents should be responsible enough not to buy games that are meant for older teens and adults, but then again the gaming industry should be aware of what is going on with their games. As I understand it, it was an internet patch for the nudies, so I'm not sure who should be held responsible for that - probabley the site offering the enhancement, not the game or the parent...

I'll wait and see where this goes before passing judgement, after all, we Dems DO NEED large contributors as well as the grassroots. I'd rather it be all grassroots, but that is just not realistic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Someone At Rockstar Made The Content
The patch only unlocked it. I'm assuming they made it but were told to take it out and the programmer just did a lazy job of removing it. From what I understand this PatrickW guy who created the edited script only had to change one thing. I'm guessing that one thing is probably something that makes what's there into programming notes. I know in C and VB you can do that. If you have something you haven't completed you just put some stuff there to change it to a note about your program so it isn't used to run the program.

Problem is when people found out about it Rockstar didn't tell the truth and said it was reverse engineering. They should have come clean. However, the actual content isn't even that bad when you consider what Hollywood can put into an R-rated movie. I think that even though it's there it's so stupid and unrealistic that it should have retained its M rating.

Anyway, this is my problem with Hillary Clinton. I don't feel you can say that videogames are as bad as drugs and tobacco because of some silly sex game and then take money from the people you're condemning. She's basically alienated the videogame crowd who doesn't want the government butting into our private lives to tell us what we can and cannot buy (I can't buy San Andreas anymore because of the pressure the government has put on the company with the FTC investigations and all of this garbage. No store will carry it in my area so they've basically restricted my access to something I should be able to purchase since I'm over 21 anyway). However, now she's looking hypocritical by accepting their money. Are those moral values voters who think that videogames are the devil going to vote for her now? I just don't think Hillary Clinton can win in '08 if she's going to do stuff like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. She never "put down the video game industry"
She simply expressed concern over the rampant sex and violence in some games, such as Grant Theft Auto.

Get your facts straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. What Are You Talking About?
She compared it to big tobacco and drugs. You don't think that's a bullshit sensationalistic statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Lieberman MO
After squalling about the degeneracy of Hollywood, he'd never propose legislation with any bite to it. Then he'd mop up at fundraisers. It was Joe who handled point for Al in the movie industry in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, one thing is obvious
Democratic voters are as easy to herd and railroad as Republicans are.

And you think they are stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Interesting site.
I'll have to friend it.

I used to be a Hillary apologist but she jumped the shark on this one. No way is she getting my primary vote for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Look
I don't agree with what she did, but I think I can understand it. It was a quick, cheap purely political ploy to appeal to the fudie base and it may have worked. Look for more along these lines the closer we get to 2008. This was the opening salvo for her run
That being said, I am going to reserve judgement. Maybe she is pulling a fast one and is under the impression that she needs to compromise this much in order to get elected. I think 2007 will be telling; she will have to push hard then. Think she was testing the waters to see where the polls would take her.
I don't think anyone will remember this in 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'll remember
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Well yes;
but we have proven that since you are here you are more intelligent thant the average voter (possibly; or mabe it was RIGGED in which case she will have made a HUGE mistake!)See what I mean? I meant in the "public" as defined by the MSM conciousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Figures they're from Electronic Arts, the most evil company in gaming
I know EA ranks high on the BuyBlue.com metric and now I know how they get those numbers, it's how much money they give to Democrats. Nevermind what the company actually does, it's all about the cash. EA is so draconian that their own employee's have to sue them to get a day off. At least the games they put out are so derivative that I don't have to buy any of their shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Tell me about it
EA's business practices are appalling. The only EA-published games I play are the various Sims games, and I actually buy them used so I don't have to give those bastards money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC