Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Marriage is about Pro-Creation then why are old folks allowed to marry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:51 PM
Original message
If Marriage is about Pro-Creation then why are old folks allowed to marry?
I'm watching old episodes of Bill Maher's Real Time on HBO On-Demand and this is the episode where they have some leader of the Catholic Online Group (Ray Flynn I think is his name) sitting right next to Barney Frank (Rep from Boston and acknowledged Gay Man). I don't know HOW Bill Maher got these 2 to sit side by side in a room (they were of the TV screen, not a panalist) but that Catholic Guy looked like he was on the worlds worst blind date.

So the whole argument by the Catholic Priest who's against gay & lesbian marriages was the whole "Pro-Creation" theory. That because Gay & Lesbian couples are not capable of pro-creation then therefore they cannot be married.

Then something dawned on me. My mother remarried about 10 years ago. She was pre-menopausal AND she was also schedule to get a Hysterectomy. Therefore it would be impossible for my mother and her future new husband to pro-create. Under this catholic priest ideology they shouldn't be allowed simply because of their inability to pro-create.

:shrug:

Seriously, that's what it sounded like he was discribing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Your question is like a zen koan the way it breaks through the idiocy
Thanks I will use that in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the bible covers this
Sometimes God gave chillun to the barren and/or old. In fact, mebbe Mary's parents (don't forget, the immaculate conception refers to HER, not to Jesus) were old.

Anyway, by my way of thinking, I think that God could give children to me and my same sex partner just the same, so why can't we get married? Godnoze we try try try to conceive (together)...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Well, actually, "Immaculate Conception" refers to Mary being
born without Original Sin. That is, if I remember my Baltimore Catechism right.

The "Virgin Birth" refers to Mary conceiving and delivering a baby while still being a virgin.

I haven't check up on the details of this stuff for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. That was Sarah who was old and Barren
But she was like hundreds of years old or some really obtuse age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. have your gramps
spayed or neutered?

relax, it's just a veiled way to validate hate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. A long time ago somebody submitted an article to DU...
It walked about the "Just because" theory that Evangelical fascists want to teach in America's science classes.

We exist "just because" God created us.

God created us "just because" the Bible says he did.

God wrote/inspired the Bible "just because" we say he did.

The Bible is God's Truth "just because" it says it is.


*shudders*

I think this is the same song and dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I always loved
the "kissing Hanks ass" analogy to religious belief. If ya haven't read it before it's hilarious. http://jhuger.com/kisshank.mv .

I hope no one finds that too offensive, spirituality doesn't bother me, it's the (lack of) logic some of those charlatans use that bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. But there's always the chance they'll get the cover of Weekly World News
Guiness Book of World Records, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. If she does you better damn well repent
She has no uterus to speak of. If she's pregnant than we know it's the second coming on it's way.

:crazy:

I hope to see you at RBNYC's party!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is probably ok to marry
But they probably shouldn't have sex.

Sex is only moral for the purpose of procreation within a marriage..... If you buy any of that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. because hope springs eternal, even if the male member doesn't?
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hannity was blowing this line of garbage recently
What a pile of horsefeathers! My wife and I have been married for three years and we were both middle aged (47) when we got married. Our kids thought it was a great thing and we both found the person wanted and needed the most in each other. No way would we even consider having other children, even if we could; we already have 4 between us, with two grandchildren (and another on the way). Sure, priorities change over time, but marriage in middle age is no less fulfilling than a good marriage at a younger age (for different reasons, though). Wehad both experienced terrible marriages when we were younger, and had been divorced, me for 10 years, and she for almost 11 years. Nuts to this whole 'marriage is simply for procreation garbage'. It may have held some water in the past, but consider this: marriage as an institution did not emerge until questions about illegitimate childrens' inheritance became an issue. Marriage legitimized children and gave them the right of inheritance (at least, in most cultures). Sounds like kind of a repuke thing, eh?
(screw around all you want, but remember that you owe nothing to the kids you have out of wedlock-only those blessed by the bourgeoisie). OK, I am done ranting now-thanks for the opprtunity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is an excellent point
that I'm putting in my hip pocket for future use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. The same reasoning would apply
to younger couples who don't intend to have children, or if one partner is unable to have any.

That kind of reasoning (marriage is only for procreation) has always struck me as utterly ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's the argument that I think is the killer
All couples should--according to this logic--be required to pass fertility tests before being allowed to marry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well, any fertile male could marry any fertile female, but...
Edited on Mon Sep-29-03 01:38 AM by Book Lover
every one of us females will become infertile after menopause. The end result is that women would be forbidden to wed after menopause, whereas men could marry until death. There also should be a provisio that any marriage that does not produce children by, oh, let's say, three years, is automatically annuled.

My copy of the catechism is in storage, so I'm just guessing here, but I suspect there is a "lesser evil" provisio that allows men and women of an advanced age to marry in order to allow sexual release within the confines of holy matrimony.

Reductio ad absurdum indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's terrible but
when I hear or read the word "priest" I think of paedophiles(sp?). People should do what makes them happy, as long as they don't hurt others.
I also think a man should marry a woman, but if a man wants to marry another man or a woman wants to marry another woman why don't we all wish them well. Besides, they can adopt. It's already happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't...
While I have little love for the church nowadays, every Catholic priest I've met -- except for one -- has brought something positive to my life. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanty Oilish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
17. So they'll be respectable when the grown kids move back in. nt
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. Marriage serves other purposes
Marriage serves to create social ties and bonds between human beings, and it satisfies emotional and psychological needs. It's a lot more than just procreation. Procreation may be the prime purpose of marriage, and I doubt anyone would dispute, but it's not the only purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hogarth Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'll never again procreate ...
... and I hope this notion survives into my next life. This life is now covered. A medical gorilla yanked and stabbed and cut me until it was time for his staff to bill me for a vasectomy some years back. I love the kids, but they're an experience I've already had.

Give me an autumn marriage with my honey ... no kid-crap, and no expectations from church or state. Parenthood has its rewards, but why propogate the madness?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. 2 words
"Grandfather clause"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC