Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it true that Arnold S. (gang) raped a black woman?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:04 PM
Original message
Is it true that Arnold S. (gang) raped a black woman?
I hate to have to bring this up here but I keep hearing reports about Arnold taking part in some sort of gang rape in Gold's Gym. I've found a few sources but nothing really reliable. If this is true, then I'm outraged that the media has not covered this more.

http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/41/deadline-finke.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. it wasn't a gang rape
it was a gang bang, according to AHH-nold (I believe this info came from the old Oui article)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. This has been debunked
"not all the guys participated", according ro Ahnold, "only the guys who don't mind fucking in front of other guys...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Some were embarassed by the uselessness of their steroid-induced shriveled
up pensises and testicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I BEG TO DIFFER
it's difficult to tell what the feelings of the woman involved were because SURPRISE SURPRISE that f***ing bastard Arnold DOESN'T EVEN MENTION THEM. However it came about, his attitude towards women, black or non-black, is a f***ing DISGRACE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is absolutely no evidence...
or even a CHARGE by anyone that there was a rape.

He did discuss being part of a group-sex "activity". But there's nothing to indicate it wasn't entirely consensual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You are correct. Except if this were a Democrat all the details would...
...be needed to make absolutely sure. Starting with finding the woman and forcing her to testify even if she didn't want to. It would be only for the childrens sake of course though.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Bing Bing Bing
You are SO right! Oh I fear for the children! What will we tell the children?;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. What? The media are as fair to liberals as they are to Repugs.
Oh, wait, you're talking about the US media.

Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. ...except of the improbability of the circumstances described
by Arnold. "She walked in totally naked."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Though it WAS the '70s...
In LA. Gold's Gym.

You never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
55. if it actually happened...
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 05:07 AM by bearfartinthewoods
and wasn't the equivalent of a "dear penthouse" letter, it could have been a hooker or it could have been any number of women who would jump on the opportunity to screw a bunch of very muscular men. is that so hard to believe? bodybuilders have groupies just like rock stars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. F*** THAT
there was nothing to indicate it WASN'T EITHER. The point is, the feelings of the woman involved WERE NOT EVEN ALLUDED TO IN THE INTERVIEW, presumably because ARNOLD DIDN'T F***ING CARE WHAT THEY WERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Well there are a few things to indicate that it wasn't...
Arnold didn't classify it as a rape.

As far as I know, no police complaint was filed.

As far as I know, the woman involved has never come forward to say it was a rape.

It's like saying because I said I had sex with my boyfriend last week, that there's a 50% likelihood that I raped him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Only 53% of women report rape...
Back in the 70s that statistic was much lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. There is still
not a single piece of evidence, or even an assertion, that a rape was committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
52. OMG
you truly DON'T GET IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delhurgo Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. It may have not even been a gang bang.
He now says that he said outrageous things back then in an effort to publicise bodybuilding, suggesting that he may have just made it up. If there was an actual rape though, I have no doubt the victim would have long since come forward seeking justice or a huge payoff.

I must say that I'm just as uncomfortable with this smearing of Arnold on personal matters as I was with Clinton. Arnold himself said back then that he was embarassed about the way republicans politicised the Lewinsky matter.

I'm sure I'm in the minortiy here, but I like Arnold. I like his socially liberal, fiscally conservative politics - and I'd probably vote for him if I lived in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. HE'S A DISGUSTING PIG
I f***ing hope you ARE in the minority here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackie97 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I wouldn't be so sure of that.
"If there was an actual rape though, I have no doubt the victim would have long since come forward seeking justice or a huge payoff."

While a woman may possibly get a payoff from the guy, she may also come out with nothing. In any case, she probably would be portrayed as simply a slut trying to smear Arnold. Her reputation would be ruined probably. It might not be worth the trouble for a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. What he has SAID to the media is fair game--this dirt is as
public as it can be.

No respect; the man's conduct is all I need to see, and believe me, I'm no prude. But lack of good judgment in conducting one's personal life doesn't speak well to his ability to govern the most populous state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. We cannot be hypocrites here
I think most Dems were pissed off (I know I was, still am really)and thought it was wrong that our president was impeached because of sex, so we can't now use Arnold's sexual indiscrimination against him as a reason that he should not be governor of California. His serious lack of experience is good enough, along with the fact that he has not really articulated his plan to try and fix the economy or any other problems, and that should be the argument not his past sexual activities. Remember, we are the party of the Good, and the Repubs are the Party of the Hypocrites. For all we know, Arnold is telling the truth when he said he made up this story for a sex magazine to promote his movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. take the high road?
not on your life...fight fire with fire, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. well, there would have been a HUGE difference in this case
if AHHnold had been accused of rape, it would have been a HELL of a lot different than marital infidelity

A HELL of a lot different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I don't agree
We are better than they are. They used sex to try and get rid of a Democratic president. If Arnold's sexual past is used as a good reason to not vote for him then we are no better than the likes of that Coutler broad or Fat-ass Rush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. well...rape is a lot different than consensual sex
in that it is actually a crime. that is, of course, if the allegations are true. and i do think the republican penchant for finger-pointing at democrats, while doing the very thing they decry, needs to be exposed as the hypocrisy it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
56. the only "allegations" i've seen so far came from the thread originator
and it seems more like wishful thinking than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. it's the hypocrisy...the party of 'family values'
deserves to be held to the standards they set for others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Amen, sister!
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 08:03 PM by blondeatlast
Good Lord, how often did we hear about Bill Clinton's admission of using giggle-weed in the 60s? The horror!

Anything he has SAID to the media (especially if he knew it was the media--and he clearly did) is fair game.

Rape or no rape, public group sex doesn't speak to a level of judgment I want in my governor.

But then, I don't live in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. correction: sister
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 08:04 PM by noiretblu
:hi: la femme noiretblu :hi:

on edit...i see you edited already :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Sorry--slip of the, er, fingers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
54. not in this case
You can shout all day about his sexism, and even the grab-ass he's been doing to reporters and people he may have worked with. There's no way you can say he raped someone. And, in fact, playing this up without any proof will just get it spun into a "campaign of hatred" by Democrats.

The subject of this thread comes from an alleged sexual incident with a very possibly fictitious woman.

By the way? "We are better than they are" will not earn you any support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. You're right Gayle
I'm sure they would be. That's precisely the reason that we should ignore this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Rape should never be ignored...
If it came out that Clinton really raped someone then I would want him to be held accountable as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
53. smell a couple of freepers where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I don't like cheaters, but I loathe RAPISTS
In a sense, I think it was rape, regardless of whether or not the girl consented. Think about it, a woman who would allow such is obviously not in the correct state of mind: she may have been drugged, drunk, or mentally unstable. Either way, taking advantage of someone who is powerless is, in a sense, rape-statuatory rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. I know a number of women
who would adamantly disagree that they're not capable of making the conscious decision to engage in group sex.

It's sexist to think that any woman who makes such a decision is unstable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. group sex is one thing
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 07:54 PM by blkgrl
But a gang bang in a gym locker room is something totally different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. ?
I see no difference. "Group sex" doesn't imply a location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Could have been
a groupie. Or even a prostitute? Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. so it's COOL because he is a LIAR????????????????????
PLEASE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
45. Then again it could have been rape
plain and simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. What does that say about the man?
For all we know, Arnold is telling the truth when he said he made up this story for a sex magazine to promote his movie.

If you are running for office, what is SAID VOLUNTARILYTO THE PRESS should be fair game, regardless of why it was said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappurr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let me note something....
Gloria Alred is without a doubt the biggest media whore attorney that practices in this country (altho why she still has a licence I'll never know). She contacted LA Child Protective Services when Michael Jackson held his baby over the balcony in Germany (as if LA would have any jurisdiction even if it were abuse). Then, of course, she went on all the talk shows to talk about it. Of course she represented Nicole Brown's sister another real loser who was out to make money off her dead sister's name. And Gloria went on all the talk shows to talk about it. Now, of course, she represents Scott Peterson's girlfriend and she is on all the talk shows talking about it. She has been terribly irresponsible with the things she has said on these shows in light of the judges gag order.

She will take up any "cause" if it will get her pubicity. Hence and 25 year old alleged gang bang which was probably an orgy if it happened at all.

I don't particularly like Swartnegger....just can't take him seriously. But I like Alred a lot less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. ya know Cappurr
when Nicole Simpson was killed, I felt so, so sorry for her when I realized she didn't have not one good, true friend in her life. Even her own sisters sold her out. That was extremely upsetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappurr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yep...
Her sister was a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. she really was a disgrace...it was very sad
to see her so intent on making money (and fame) from her sister's tragic death. it really bothered me...it still does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. As a former Californian, I say anyone who votes for Arnold is a disgrace
that's all. I would vote No Recall/Yes Bustamante or that Green party guy if I was feeling pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. well...
I DO live in California, and I WILL be voting NO on recall, YES on Bustamante.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. amen...the bozos who will vote for a b-actor
will be outnumbered by the rest of us. and i sincerely pray that the recall is renender moot, effectively ending this pathetic circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. Clarification, people.
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 09:02 PM by blondeatlast
Just because it wasn't reported doesn't mean it wasn't a rape. The only person who REALLY can claim if it was rape or not is the victim, ewhether the victim claims it or not.

Dictionary.com

1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to sex acts, especially sexual intercourse.
2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction.
3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. victim = rape...
why do you use the term victim if you are not 100% sure it was a rape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. She made clear the distinction she was defining
and in that distinction the one perpetrated against would be described as a victim.

The hair splitting on this make me wish to :puke:

I have no idea whether Arnold is a rapist but I am 100% certain he is a fucking pig. That's enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. It's an uphill battle, NSMA, but I shall climb until I reach
or fall painfully off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Your subject line said it: victim=rape.
"you are not 100% sure it was a rape?" I think the victim knows.

My point is this: it doesn't matter if I, you, Arnold S. or the cops think it was a rape. I've known a couple of women who were raped but didn't report it. They were raped, whether they reported it or not (from their descriptions, they clearly were).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC