Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tucker Carlson just said the Rove story WAS NO BIG DEAL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:03 PM
Original message
Tucker Carlson just said the Rove story WAS NO BIG DEAL
OMG, I cannot believe he was paid enough or dumb enough to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
timber84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. In others words!!!!!
We're in deep shit!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Um, no. Bow tie boy is a tool. Everybody knows that.
His parroting WH talking points is to be expected. He's a shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:05 PM
Original message
He has been saying this for a week. It's the rw talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's a Republican mouthpiece. Always has been, always will be.
Why would anyone expect anything different from him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder
Just WHAT constitutes a "big deal"?

A blow job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. not for Tucker
he blows BushCo every day.

twice on Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. the question was there anyone to rebutal him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes Rachel Maddow, she did a good job as usual nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. that is the important point, that they give equal time to another view
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Exactly which is why the show is actually OK to watch. As long as
both sides are given time to state their position and no one is screaming "traitor" at them, I can handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. yes
rachel maddow (sp?)
who does a great job, but they were denying implications of this situation so much it was unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Pronouncements from Tucker matter?
No, not at all, he had no content for his show...so he makes stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nytemare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Which is more insidious, sperm on a dress, or outing a CIA agent?
In the late 90's, the pubs SURE AS HELL made a big deal about Clinton lying on the Lewinsky deal.

If this was not a big deal, a reporter would not be in jail for contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Tucker, time to loosen the bow tie and let some oxygen in.
This is HUGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Even worse than huge, it's HUGH!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, and per Nixon
Watergate was just a third rate burglary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Anything for ratings, huh, you smarmy whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. I guarantee that if these events
had transpired in a Dem administration, Carlson would be singing a different tune. To be a repuke is to be a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I want to live long enough to see Tucker and any other "journalist"
that was complicit with this administration in prison. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. You have to drink the kool aid to say that
he's beyond being a paid spokesperson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Republicans stick together
Notice how every Republican is saying the same thing now? The memo is out. But in a similar situation, we turn on each other. That's why they are able to get away with all the madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Except none of the high-profile elected Repukes
are saying a thing. Their silence is deafening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's a drowning man.
Buh-bye, career.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why does this little prick Carlson have a national show?
...I thought that John Stewart pretty much discredited him when he appeared as the guest on Crossfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Tucker doesn't have his own show. His bow tie does.
Tucker just gets to come along for the ride. It was a two-fer deal. MSNBC got the worst of that bargain, that's for certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's still scared of Karl .. and hedging in case he doesn't go down.
But, Earth to Tucker, Rove's toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cry baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ol' Tuck must have gotten the Rove talking points memo that
Terry Morran was asking Scotty about today. He is nothing if not a dutiful servant to *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Tuckers an entertainer, not a brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC