Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Candy Crowley be ANY more repulsive?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:55 PM
Original message
Could Candy Crowley be ANY more repulsive?
just wondering...

i can't even stand watching her she so biased... why she's allowed to anchor (especially a political show) is beyond me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.. a turnaround. Not so long ago you used to say she wasn't so bad.
What did it for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. you're right
i'd too closely paid attention to her actual writing, and less to her commentary (she used to do MUCH less of it)

but now that she's started anchoring, and conducts interviews and such, one must be brainless not to see her bias.

it's repulsive beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least she's not coulter
Crowley may be nine, Bay Buchanan is nine and half but coulter is a ten on the cant watch scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Crowley is the only one of your list who masquerades as
as a reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Um, that's because Buchanan and Couler don't masquerade..
..as non-partisan, objective journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. In words of two syllables: hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I agree.
and if she was brilliant, i'd be okay with her being fat.


but your not allwoed to be fat ugly and stupid.


that just makes you too much of an american stereotype for my tastes.


(incidentally i'm not skinny - nor am i sensitive)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sensitivity is irrelevant to this
Her weight (or mine, or yours) is nothing that should be subject to anyones approval.

Substitute a minority, or gay, or disabled for fat and it makes you look like a bigot. Don't hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. i'm so sorry i won't reach your
appropriate level of intellectual discourse.


feel free to ignore me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. what "C" word would that be?
creep?

cretin?

crow?

if she won't use them/it, I will.

Fuck that scag.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Ann Coulter is fat too..only she has nothing between her skin and bones
so fat is not physical..it is physiological..do you understand?

People we love are never 'fat'..regardless of how much the scale says they weigh..in fact....a close friend of mine totally threw me when she said she weighed 175..cause I would swear she is a size 5..so it is in the eye of the beholder!

Besides.I bet her I would weight less than her if we were weighed in a body of water....I would float...she would sink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. thank you.
ann prolly does have a high bodyfat % in real life tho. she has no muscle tone it seems like so what else is there between her skin and bones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. That's not fat, it's pure oleagenous slime
It only seems like honey to the wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. And she took Judy Woodruff's place...
Go figure... must have "starved" her out! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Mike Malloy said once...
Judy Woodruff looks like she just came out of a famine.
...and her co-host, Candy Crowley looks like she caused the famine.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. LOL!
Love that Mike Malloy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
newsguyatl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. smarmy
that's the word i always think of to describe her as well.

like she's above everyone -- that she thinks she's fooling everyone "below her" as to her true agenda.

i can't even stand to look at her anymore -- and no, not because of her physical appearance -- just because she's so blatantly biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Busholini is much
more appropriate than any Fuher references
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. That's "bushOILini" ... a petroleum-based Mussolini.
With coprolite for brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Even better, you come up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yep. Been calling the turd that for three years, at least.
I've been right all along, too. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. No she can't be. She sold her soul to the bush gang...
in 2000 and has never looked back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess she could be....if she did her job NAKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Great minds think alike? You beat me to that exact thought.
How did Jon Poderatz(sp?) discribe reading Klein's book on Hillary? After awhile he wanted someone to poke his eyes out.
If I were to see Candy Crowley naked, I think I'd want to give up vision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Wow that's SO funny
Making fun of someones appearance, you must be SO proud of yourself- can we make fun of disabled people and gay people now?

Candy Crowley is an idiot, just like any thin reporter who spouts talking points. Got to give her credit, she went a long way in journalism without Laurie Dhue looks. That's got to stand for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Ah, you're right. She probably can't help it...
But the "biased" part stays in. She was a rabid Bushie in 2000 and her reporting showed it. She was a Bush talking point parrot.

She was assigned to Kerry in 2004 but plainly didn't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. No argument there
Arguments that stay on the content of the character (or lack of) are always called for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. I can't blame Candy C. you've got to blame CNN. They put her there.
I can't stand her, but CNN is trying to outfox Faux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FearofFutility Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Coast to Coast does remind me of Hannity and Colmes (sp?)
Crowley just rolls over everyone and Ron is a little meek for my taste. I like Ron, but he's too polite or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Monica Crowley's sister
is married to Alan Colmes. I've never seen her picture, though, and don't know what her politics are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FearofFutility Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Interesting
If Monica's sister is anything like Monica, it would explain Alan's wimpish ways. He would be used to not getting a word in edgewise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe if she had puss-eruptive acne
Supposedly one of her sons is hot as shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. she's got a hot son?
a hot liberal son, or a hot conservative son?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC