Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hardball: Plame talk coming up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 06:17 PM
Original message
Hardball: Plame talk coming up?
Edited on Fri Jul-08-05 06:18 PM by Cush
caught part of it before the last commercial break, but he (Matthews) mentioned that "Woodward attacks the Plame Investigation" as "coming up".....right now it;s still about London
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. my bet is they will white wash it
it will be the issue of journalists protecting their sources, not the outing of wilson as a whistle blower by out his wife a CIA agent

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. eh, Woodward will be talking about his new book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Woodward is defending Miller
Edited on Fri Jul-08-05 06:58 PM by medeak
and Novak for gawd's sake...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whoring for Miller
Tweety and Woodward even lied and said that Novak used the word "operative" in his column all the time. I think BOb Somersby did a L-N search and proved that wasn't the case when this story first broke.

If everyone's right about Miller being a spook, I wouldn't be shocked to hear the same thing about Woodward, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I didn't quite get what Woodward said
Is he saying that it was an accidental leak? That Novak didn't know she was an Agent, called her an Operative (Tweety says he calls everyone that), and it was just a lucky guess? Woodward didn't seem to want to discuss the law or the wording of the statute, but instead mentioned that we are at war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC