Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inhofe - "global warming...the greatest hoax ever perpetrated..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jeffsurfus Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:29 PM
Original message
Inhofe - "global warming...the greatest hoax ever perpetrated..."
In the latest on the battle over the confirmation of Michael Leavitt as the new head of the EPA, things reached a new low yesterday!

According to the NY Times, Rep. James Inhofe, the chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, said at one point that the concept of global warming, a concern of the Democrats, "could be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people."

The full article can be read at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/24/politics/24LEAV.html

This is the head of the Environment and Public Works Committee!!

I just about lost my breakfast this morning over this one. The best and the brightest are representing us well inside the beltway, aren't they?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Inhofe Is Your Typical Flat Earther
He hates science, yet chairs a committee that is responsible for dealing with quite a bit of science. This is the same suspicious, angry white Midwesterner who has dismissed science that does not support his narrow ideas several times in the last couple of years on the topic of global warming.

I tend to think his assignment to this position was not an accident; if the interests supporting the Republican Party are staunchly opposed to any examination of global warming, why not put a knuckle-dragging, science-hating, unquestioning toadie in charge of that committee?

Screw him and all his kind. The Republicans can have them. I just want to sterilize them so their ignorance can't infect another generation.

It's not Tolerant Tuesday any longer in my neck of the woods...we've moved on to Heretical Hump Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is madness like this
that drives me into a rage. Just one further example (as if we needed any more) of why we have to get these nutjobs out of office quick, quick, quick! Why the environmental community (other than lcv and sierra club) are not more active in electoral politics I'll never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Last week on NOW with Bill Moyers
Interview with former head of the EPA Whitman.

http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_clearingtheair.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Foolish me I thought the greatest Hoax was Theory of Evolution
I guess there is great and then again greatest. Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffsurfus Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, the greatest hoax is....
George W. is President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Inhofe - the greatest electoral hoax perpetrated on the state of Oklahoma
He's truly a throwback to 1988.

Most of the other fossil-fuel hacks & whores have moved on from the "It's a GREEN CONSPIRACY in league with the KREMLIN!" take on the topic. They're willing to concede that well, maybe, just maybe something's going on.

Under the new greenwashed approach, many energy companies will admit that human activity may be affecting the climate. However, since Captain James Cook did not have digital instruments for his oceanic studies, and since every glacier in the world hasn't had laser-sight measurement systems in place since the late 1700s, it's far too soon to draw any conclusions. Obviously, decades of additional study, performed by "sound scientists" and "sound scientific methods", are called for.

Not Inhofe, though. He's happy to dismiss 15 years of science as a "hoax". He's happy to flap his lips at great length with the results depicted in the latest "science" news release from CEI, the Frontiers of Freedom Foundation or Flush Phlegmball.

An oil industry tool, elected by fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess that large chuck of Arctic ice cap which fractured off...
won't convince him, nothing will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Maybe if the entire Ross Ice Shelf disintegrated
Maybe if polar bears became extinct.

Maybe if the remaining glaciers in Glacier National Park melted.

Maybe if the North Atlantic Current shut down.

Maybe if Tulsa, OK hit 115F for 30 days straight or more next summer.

Maybe if an 800-millibar hurricane destroyed Miami.

Maybe if Fairbanks sank into melting permafrost, taking with it the Alaska Pipeline.

But then Fred Singer or Keith Idso would put out a press release, and Inhofe would brandish that document for all the world to see. He'd then bellow that it was all just a hoax, a plot, a conspiracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Clearly the Ice Shelf didn't get the memo. Here's the real skinny:
Look, no one with ANY credibility in the scientific world doubts Global Warming. It is simply a fact backed by tons of climate data. The debate is whether or not it is caused by humans. Now, "caused by humans" requires two hypotheses to be true:

1.) Greenhouse gasses account for the climate change. Here, climate models seem so show a good correlation with rising greenhouse gasses and rising average temperatures. Critics attack the accuracy of the models.

2.) Humans are making the greenhouse gasses. Historical records show a rise in CO2 that follows the rise in industrial activity. Critics claim this is a coincidence and that other natural processes create CO2.

Most climatologists do believe humans are causing global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Last time I looked, anthropogenic CO2 was about 7 billion tons annually
And that's not even counting the other GHG totals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. They never give up on this
First it was:
"Global Warming Doesn't Exist"
Then it was:
"Global Warming exists, but it doesn't matter"
Then it was:
"Global Warming exists, does matter, but isn't caused my man"
I expecting the new one to be:
"Global Warming exists, does matter, hey - how I can I make a buck of it?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanConquest Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Much like the tax cut hoax:
First it was:
"Tax cuts work."
Then it was:
"Tax cuts aren't working fast enough: we need to make them permanent."
Then it was:
"Okay, things are pretty bad right now, but they'd be worse if we didn't have the Tax cuts."
Then it was:
"It's going to work any day now...any...day..."
Followed by:
"Um...it's Clinton's fault."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep
First it was:
"It's your money" (When we had a surplus)
Then it was:
"Short term stilumus" (To get us out of slump in economy)
Then it was
"For long term economic growth" (permanent tax cuts)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. average global temperature over past 100 years
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 01:33 PM by gristy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, tell that to Europe after their "balmy" summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC