Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

anyyone watching Dave Obey Dem on Hourse Floor c-span whow!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:52 PM
Original message
anyyone watching Dave Obey Dem on Hourse Floor c-span whow!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. a Repub insulted his amendment and he demanded the 'words be
taken down"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the words taken down will be transcribed and read back-so we will hear
them again--I believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What did the Repub say?
In summary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Democrats
are at war with Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not near a TV
what's he up to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's he saying?
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 02:55 PM by Oreo
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cspan_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS
Link to CSPAN

Text on screen showing If Ruled out of order member cannot speak for the rest of the day. What happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. they will be read shortly--if the Repug is ruled out of order he is not al
lowed to speak for the rest of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obey is one of my alltime favorites in congress.
He's WAY tough, but gets little publicity for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do they have to sit in the corner too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Obey is having an argument about the religious training going on in CO
at the acedemay. the Dems had been promised that they could put up an amendment --but now it seems (if i followed right)--the Repugs did not allow the amendment and some Repug blasted Obey-for wanting the amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. And wear the dunce cap?
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. btw:
here's a pic of the boxing gloves we gave Dave on his 30th anniversary....looks like he's going to need them again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. grand--thanks. I used to live in N. WI--so I know him well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Striking words
of aRepub from Indiana. The words are that Democrats are starting a war on Christians. These Repubs will not stop the disingenuous rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. yes--the Repug said something about the Dems starting a war on chirist-
ianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. That is an outrageous statement!
Democrats are opposed to theocracy but we are in no way wanting to sart a war with any religion or sect.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. I believe the chair will only strike the words IF he rules they are inapp-
riote. If so--that is disciplinling the Repug for saying them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. What is the topic? What state is Dave from? Info please. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. He is long time Dem. from N. WI--very outspoken against the Administra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Explanation on screen
Words Taken Down
If ruled out of order, the Member can't speak again for the day without permission

The House rule used to discipline a Member for using inappropriate words in debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. The inital Repug Repres. opposing the amendent was the "chicken menu
Rep. from California--sorry i do not recall his name. Then this INDiana Repug asksed to speak--then the naughty words were spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. I seem to recall the chicken menu guy was Duncan Hunter...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Yes--Hunter thank you--he is the one who basically started this rucus-
Obey wanted the amendment and Hunter said it was not necessary--after the Repugs had said amendments could be offered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. How long does it take for the Chairman to review that statement?
sure is quiet....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. seems to take forever doesn't it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. One of the things Obey had spoke about was the ousted chaplin who
spoke up about the prophetlitizing going on at the air force acedemy in Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Profit from Proselytizing Propheteerists
Proselytizing ;-) Though im sure they are invoking the holy prophets!! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. They have to locate Rove first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I would not be surprized if they did try to communicate with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. I have Tivo
He said "Like a moth to a flame, Democrats can't help themselves when it comes to denegrating and demonizing Christians."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Think that's enough to get him put in the corner for the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. thanks much--what a crapola thing to say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. the debate had to do with phophetlatizing in the military--the case in CO.
Basically the repugs said it was not going on and Obey said yes it was!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. These people need to be called out on those comments.
I am so sick of this...

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Thanks
Exact words are important.

For example, strange as it may seem, it is against the rules of the House to attribute base motives to a person on the other side of an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. that was a mouthful-wonder if he was prepared to say this statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. he was reading it
It was prepared!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. What's the criteria, if any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Hostettler of Indiana is the one who made the comment!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toey Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. i hate my state, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr n/t
btw...what does n/t stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. n/t = no text
Means there is no text following the subject line.

Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toey Donating Member (568 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #46
78. thanks a mil!
I just love this site and i'm sooooooo fired up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I do not have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. "unparlimentary" language--chair is still reviewing the language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. one of the criteria was saying something bad about the character of
another congressperson, and profanity. but he said others that i did missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. Methinks this one:
* * * <<NOTE: Sec. 363. Motives of Members not to be arraigned.>> The
consequences of a measure may be reprobated in strong terms; but to
arraign the motives of those who propose to advocate it is a
personality, and against order. Qui digreditur a materia ad personam,
Mr. Speaker ought to suppress. Ord. Com., 1604, Apr. 19.


The arraignment of the motives of Members is not permitted (V, 5147-
51; Dec. 13, 1973, p. 41270), and the Speakers have intervened to
prevent it, in the earlier practice preventing even mildest imputations
(V, 5161, 5162). However, remarks in debate may address political, but
not personal, motivations for legislative positions (Jan. 24, 1995, p.
2214; Mar. 8, 1995, pp. 7307, 7308; Nov. 17, 1995, p. 33832; June 13,
1996, p. 14043) or for committee membership (July 10, 1995, pp. 18257-
59). Accusing another Member of hypocrisy has been held not in order
(July 24, 1979, p. 20380; Mar. 29, 1995, p. 9675), and characterizing
the motivation of a Member in offering an amendment as deceptive and
hypocritical was ruled out of order (June 12, 1979, p. 11461). A
statement in debate that an amendment could only be demagogic or racist
because only demagoguery or racism impelled such an amendment was ruled
out of order as impugning the motives of the Member offering the
amendment (Dec. 3, 1973, pp. 41270, 41271). However, debate
characterizing a pending measure as a ``patently petty political
terrorist tactic'' was held in order as directed at the pending measure
rather than the motive or the character of its proponent (Nov. 9, 1995,
p. 31413). While in debate the assertion of one Member may be declared
untrue by another, yet in so doing an intentional misrepresentation must
not be implied (V, 5157-5160), and if stated or implied is censurable
(II, 1305) and presents a question of privilege (III, 2717; VI, 607). A
Member in debate having declared the words of another ``a base lie,''
censure was inflicted by the House on the offender (II, 1249).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. Is the Chair Republican?
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 03:15 PM by dogday
IF so, he is thinking how this is going to affect him and the party. He is taking a long freaking time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. YUP--they are always the chairs as they are in controll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
44. CSPAN Is making it look Like Obey did not like that the Republican
said something about Religion in the Military. That is not what he said.... That is very misleading.... He did not like it that the Repub said that we were trying to destroy Christianity....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. yes--it IS a prepared speech!!!! The IND. rep.--listen up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
47. Can't Repug just apologize and move on?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. there--you heard it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yes I did!
Thanks Obey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Yep, the "war on Christianity" and then the Dem's "denigrating and ....
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 03:27 PM by grumpy old fart
demonizing christians"....pretty good Rovian talkin' points there.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OctOct1 Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Oh My, Obey just repeated it
How Nasty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
51. Sorry I duped a post on this Rodeo, I didn't know that was what
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 03:27 PM by OurVotesCount-Ohio
your post was about.

I just heard the entire repeat..these repugs will stop at nothing to spread their hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
62. it is easlily done on this kind of board. no problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OctOct1 Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
52. Oh Man
I just tuned in and they shut it down.
How was that repug out of order?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Rep H asked to withdraw the last sentence he spoke. Like moths to
a flame--Dems can't help themselves demonizing and denigrating Christians"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. so--does mean that Rep. H. will not be disciplined since he withdraws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Hope he doesn't accept that guy being able to withdraw the sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Obey said "FINE--it is constructive that he withdraw the sentence!! well
Obey let him off the hook!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. He pretty much has to
But he can get a few good digs in meanwhile!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. yes, I agree--and yes--Obey did get a few good digs in!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #82
92. All in all, highly amusing
Glad you alerted us!

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
56. What is the Problem? The Gentleman was obviously out of
line by Maliciously slamming the Democrats. That is an untrue statement and proproganda....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. Here's the easiest access to the section:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. thanks I will check it out later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
63. GIVE IT TO HIM OBEY!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Obey is doing a 'gentlemenly' take down of the Repug--te he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Make the most of it, make a big deal out it, they would
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. Histettler and Repugs are digging into the word 'phophetlatizing;--like
gulag--and Nazis--they focus on the words and NOT the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #71
81. Hisspittler is gay. He should come out.
Well, okay. He sets off my gaydar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
69. And yet, Hostettler goes goosestepping on.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. They should of shut his big mouth up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. "the gentleman from Wisconsin states this as GOSPEL" . . .
Wow this one is REALLY holier than thou!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. sorry--but Host looks and sounds like a Terry Reed type!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Make your statement of Faith, just keep it out of my government!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. "Jesus Christ is my Lord and Saviour!"
I expect Jan Crouch to come out at any moment here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. And the lady with the Pink Hair
What is her name, her and her Country Western Singer Hubby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Turner--another holier than thou type is talking now (Repug).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamyrlin79 Donating Member (944 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
77. the only christians we are at war with...
are those who want a theocracy (ie, don't accept separation of church and state) and want to impose their views and beliefs on the lives of all Americans. They have shown themselves to be a threat to the liberties of all Americans, and profane the deaths of our ancestors who died to preserve those liberties. And, we will die again to preserve those liberties against domestic christian extremists. If they mean war by that, then let them eat war.

As for all the other christians who actually understand and uphold American values, worship away.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
80. Does anyone know what the 2 amendments are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. Repugs have turned the issue around--they are claiming that the
amendment will PREVENT cadets from practicing their faith. Geech!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #83
84. Barney Franks saying the chaplin was transfered--punitive-she spoke
out about the phophetlatizing at the Air Force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. god--another Rupug going on about freedom of Relgion--they do not
get it--as what happened at the Air Force was that religion was pushed on the cadets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Tonight's news: "Christianity under ATTACK in the armed forces"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Christianity is not under attack, Christianity is attacking....
Let's see them talk about how they were saving people under duress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. guess the recorded vote will come later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. nominated--lets keep track of this Obey asked for a recorded vote--good
for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. drats--i forgot-i can not nominate my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. now Palosi wants an amend. re; critiera for success in Irag (in 30 days)-i
n unclassifies form. WHOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC